A neo-institutional perspective of supply chains and energy security: Bioenergy in the UK

Applied Energy

Volumn 123, Issue , 2014, Pages 307-315

  Genus, Audley ^a   Mafakheri, Fereshteh ^b  

^a KINGSTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GREENWICH BUSINESS SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bioenergy; Energy security; Neo institutional theory; Sustainable supply chains

Indexed keywords

ENERGY CONSERVATION; ENERGY SECURITY; SUPPLY CHAINS;

ANALYTICAL APPROACH; BIO-ENERGY; GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY; HEAT AND POWER; INSTITUTIONAL RULES; NEO-INSTITUTIONAL THEORIES; SUSTAINABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS; SUSTAINABLE SUPPLY CHAINS;

SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

BIOENERGY; BIOMASS POWER; ENERGY RESOURCE; INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; POWER GENERATION; SECURITY; SUSTAINABILITY;

UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84899073653     PISSN: 03062619     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.01.084     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Cherp A., Jewell J. The three perspectives on energy security: intellectual history, disciplinary roots and the potential for integration. Curr Opin Environ Sustainab 2011, 3:1-11.
2. Winzer C. Conceptualizing energy security. Energy Policy 2012, 46:36-48.
3. Hildyard N., Lohmann L., Sexton S. Energy security for what? For whom? 2012, The Corner House, Dorset.
4. Chaudry M, Ekins P, Ramachandran K, Shakoor A, Skea J, Strbac G et al. Building a resilient UK energy system. Working Paper, UKERC/WP/ES/2009/023. London: UK Energy Research Centre; 2009.
5. Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC). The UK low carbon transition plan: national strategy for climate and energy. London: DECC; 2009.
6. Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC). The carbon plan: delivering our low carbon future. London: DECC; 2011.
7. Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC). Energy in brief. London: DECC; 2013 URN 12D/220.
8. Digest of UK Energy Statistics 2013. [accessed 2.12.13]. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/65850/DUKES_2013_Chapter_6.pdf.
9. Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC). UK bioenergy strategy London: Department of Energy and Climate Change 2012 URN 12D/077.
10. Royal Society for the Protection of Birds. Bioenergy: a burning issue. [accessed 11.12.13]. http://www.rspb.org.uk/Images/Bioenergy_a_burning_issue_1_tcm9-288702.pdf.
11. McCormick K. Bioenergy systems and supply chains. Supply chain coordination under uncertainty 2011, 545-562. Springer, Berlin. T.M. Choi, T.C.E. Cheng (Eds.).
12. Gold S. Bio-energy supply chains and stakeholders. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 2011, 16(4):439-462.
13. Iakovou E., Karagiannidis A., Vlachos D., Toka A., Malamakis A. Waste biomass-to-energy supply chain management: a critical synthesis. Waste Manage 2010, 30(10):1860-1870.
14. Scott W.R. Institutions and organizations: ideas and interests 2008, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. 3rd ed.
15. Jepperson R.L. Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalization. The new institutionalism in organizational analysis 1991, 143-163. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. W.W. Powell, P.J. DiMaggio (Eds.).
16. DiMaggio P.J., Powell W.W. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and the collective rationality in organizational fields. The new institutionalism in organizational analysis 1991, 63-82. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. W.W. Powell, P.J. DiMaggio (Eds.).
17. Lounsbury M., Crumley E.T. New practice creation: an institutional perspective on innovation. Organ Stud 2007, 28(7):993-1012.
18. Scott W.R. Institutional carriers: reviewing modes of transporting ideas over time and space and considering their consequences. Ind Corp Change 2003, 12(4):879-894.
19. Adkins E., Chen J.H., Winiecki J., Koinei P., Modi V. Testing institutional biomass cookstoves in rural Kenyan schools for the Millennium Villages Project. Energy Sust Dev 2010, 14(3):186-193.
20. Tripathi A.K., Iyer P.V.R., Kandpal T.C. Biomass gasifier based institutional cooking in India: a preliminary financial evaluation. Biomass Bioenergy 1999, 17(2):165-173.
21. Åkerman M., Kilpiö A., Peltola T. Institutional change from the margins of natural resource use: the emergence of small-scale bioenergy production within industrial forestry in Finland. Forest Policy Econ 2010, 12(3):181-188.
22. Hekkert M.P., Harmsen R., de Jong A. Explaining the rapid diffusion of Dutch cogeneration by innovation system functioning. Energy Policy 2007, 35:4677-4687.
23. Söderberg C. Institutional conditions for multi-sector environmental policy integration in Swedish bioenergy policy. Environ Polit 2011, 20(4):528-546.
24. Costello R., Finnell J. Institutional opportunities and constraints to biomass development. Biomass Bioenergy 1998, 15(3):201-204.
25. German L.A., Schoneveld G. Biofuel investments in sub-Saharan Africa: a review of the early legal and institutional framework in Zambia. Rev Policy Res 2012, 29(4):467-491.
26. McCormick K., Kaberger T. Key barriers for bioenergy in Europe: economic conditions, know-how and institutional capacity, and supply chain co-ordination. Biomass Bioenergy 2007, 31(7):443-452.
27. Roos A. Nontechnical barriers and driving forces to bioenergy market growth in USA, Austria and Sweden - the role of policy and market structure. In: 10th European conference and technology exhibition for biomass for energy and industry. Wurzburg, Germany; June 1998. p. 1154-7.
28. Roos A., Graham R.L., Hektora B., Rakos C. Critical factors to bioenergy implementation. Biomass Bioenergy 1999, 17(2):113-126.
29. Coase R. The nature of the firm. Economica 1937, 4:386-405.
30. North D. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance 1990, Cambridge University Press, New York.
31. Williamson O.E. The economic institutions of capitalism 1985, Macmillan, New York.
32. Simon H.A. Theories of bounded rationality. Decision and organizations 1972, 161-176. North Holland, London. C.B. McGuire, R. Radner (Eds.).
33. Department of Trade and Industry. Our energy future, creating a low carbon economy. London: TSO; 2003 Cmd 5761.
34. Forestry Commission England. Woodfuel Implementation Plan 2011-2014. Bristol: Forestry Commission England; 2011.
35. Department of Enterprise, Trade and Investment. Consultation document: renewable energy in Northern Ireland: realising the potential. [accessed 10.12.13]. http://www.detini.gov.uk/renewable_energy_in_northern_ireland_realising_the_potential.pdf.
36. Ofgem (Office for Gas and Electricity Markets). [accessed 30.11.13]. https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/environmental-programmes/non-fossil-fuel-obligation-scottish-renewable-obligation.
37. Department of Energy and Climate Change. UK renewable energy roadmap. London: Department of Energy and Climate Change; 2011 URN 11D/698.
38. Milieu Limited. Overview of provisions on penalties related to legislation on industrial installations in the Member States. Report for the European Commission, DG Environment under Study Contract DG ENV No 070307/2010/569468/SER/C3; January 2011.
39. Sleen PV. Biomass contracting: biomass contract structures for digestion installations. Master's thesis. University of Twente; 2010.
40. International Energy Agency. Good practice guidelines: bioenergy project development and biomass supply. Paris: OECD/IEA; 2007.
41. Environment Agency. Minimising greenhouse gas emissions from biomass energy generation. Bristol: Environment Agency; 2009.
42. Biomass energy centre website. [accessed 10.12.13]. http://www.biomassenergycentre.org.uk/portal/page?_pageid=73,1%26_dad=portal%26_schema=PORTAL.
43. Chum H., Faaij A., Moreira J., Berndes G., Dhamija P., Dong H., et al. Bioenergy. IPCC special report on renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation 2011, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, K. Seyboth, P. Matschoss, S. Kadner (Eds.).
44. Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB). Dirtier than Coal. (accessed 11.12.13). http://www.rspb.org.uk/Images/biomass_report_tcm9-326672.pdf.
45. Energy Research Partnership. Technology report: bio-energy technologies review 2011. (accessed 10.12.13). http://www.energyresearchpartnership.org.uk/page12.
46. Searchinger T., Heimlich R., Houghton R.A., Dong F., Elobeid A., Fabiosa J., et al. Use of US croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land use change. Science 2008, 319:1238. 10.1126/science.1151861.
47. Critchlow J, Leroi A. Making biomass part of your energy mix. London: Bain and Company; 2012.
48. European Commission. Directive 2009/28/EC. On the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources. OJ L 140/16, 5.6.2009. Brussels: European Commission; 2009.
49. European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council: renewable energy: progressing towards the 2020 target. [accessed 19.11.13]. http://%20eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:52011DC0031:EN:HTML:NOT.
50. Hawkins Wright. Forest Energy Monitor, Issue 21. Richmond: Hawkins Wright; September-October 2012.
51. Smolker R. Bioenergy - a disaster for biodiversity, health, and human rights 2012, Post Carbon Institute, Santa Rosa, CA.
52. International Energy Agency Clean Coal Centre. Profile: public attitudes to biomass cofiring 13; 2 February 2013.
53. Department of Energy and Climate Change. DECC Public attitudes tracker - wave 7. [accessed 11.12.13]. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/public-attitudes-tracking-survey-wave-7.
54. Whitmarsh L, Upham P, Poortinga W, McLachlan C, Darnton A, Devine-Wright P, et al. Public attitudes, understanding, and engagement in relation to low-carbon energy: a selective review of academic and non-academic literatures. Report for RCUK Energy Programme. London: RCUK; January 2011.
55. Institute for European Environmental Policy Securing Biomass for Energy. Developing an environmentally responsible industry for the UK now and into the future. [accessed 11.12.13]. http://www.ieep.eu/assets/856/IEEP_UK_responsible_bioenergy.pdf.
56. Searchinger T. Sound principles and an important inconsistency in the 2012 UK bioenergy strategy. [accessed 6.12.13]. http://www.rspb.org.uk/Images/Searchinger_comments_on_bioenergy_strategy_SEPT_2012_tcm9-329780.pdf.
57. Deloitte. Knock on wood: Is biomass the answer to 2020? [accessed 6.11.13]. http://www.deloitte.com/assets/DcomUnitedKingdom/Local%20Assets/Documents/Industries/EIU/Oil%20and%20Gas/uk-eiu-biomass.pdf.
58. The Guardian RWE npower closes Tilbury Biomass Power Station; 5 July 2013.
59. Lounsbury M., Ventresca M., Hirsh P.M. Social movements, field frames and industry emergence: a cultural-political perspective on US recycling. Socio-Econ Rev 2003, 1:71-104.
60. International Energy Agency. IEA bioenergy task 40 final report: prospective study: implementation of sustainability requirements for biofuels and bioenergy and related issues for markets and trade. 2012/TEM/R/043. [accessed 11.12.13]. http://www.bioenergytrade.org/downloads/t40_implsustcert_final-report_march-2012.pdf.
61. Strang D., Meyer J.W. Institutional conditions for diffusion. Theor Soc 1993, 22(4):487-511.
62. Genus A. Governing sustainability: a discourse-institutional approach. Sustainability 2014, 6(1):283-305.