Task-specific performance effects with different numeric keypad layouts

Applied Ergonomics

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 917-922

  Armand, Jenny T ^a   Redick, Thomas S ^b   Poulsen, Joan R ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY PURDUE UNIVERSITY COLUMBUS   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Interference; Numeric keypads; Task specific performance

Indexed keywords

MATHEMATICAL INSTRUMENTS; TELEPHONE; TELEPHONE SETS; WAVE INTERFERENCE;

CELL PHONE USAGES; PERFORMANCE EFFECT; TASK-SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE;

COMPUTER KEYBOARDS;

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; CALCULATOR; COMPUTER INPUT DEVICE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KEYPAD; MALE; MEMORY; MOBILE PHONE; NORMAL HUMAN; RESPONSE TIME; STIMULUS; TASK PERFORMANCE; TELEPHONE; BIOENGINEERING; COMPUTER; DEVICES; REACTION TIME;

ADULT; CELL PHONES; COMPUTER PERIPHERALS; COMPUTERS; FEMALE; HUMAN ENGINEERING; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 84899059212     PISSN: 00036870     EISSN: 18729126     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.11.008     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Conrad R.R., Hull A.J. The preferred layout for numeral data-entry keysets. Ergonomics 1968, 11:165-173.
2. Deininger R.L. Human factors engineering studies of the design and use of push button telephone tests. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 1960, 39:995-1012.
3. Jones G.V., Martin M. Spatial recall improved by retrieval enactment. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2009, 16:524-528.
4. Loftus G.R., Masson M.E.J. Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 1994, 1:476-490.
5. Lutz M., Chapanis A. Expected locations of digits and letters on ten-button keysets. J.Appl. Psychol. 1955, 39:314-317.
6. Marteniuk R.G., Ivens C.J., Brown B.E. Are there specific performance effects for differently configured numeric keypads?. Appl. Ergon. 1996, 27:321-325.
7. Rinck M. Memory for everyday objects: where are the digits on numerical keypads?. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 1999, 13:329-350.
8. Rinck M., Ellwart T. Repetition priming during the use and recall of numerical keypads. Eur. J. Cogn. Psychol. 2004, 16:841-861.
9. Salvucci D.D. Amultitasking general executive for compound continuous tasks. Cogn. Sci. 2005, 29:457-492.
10. Simmons J.P., Nelson L.D., Simonsohn U. False-positive psychology: undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychol. Sci. 2011, 22:1359-1366.
11. Straub H.R., Granaas M.M. Task-specific preference for numeric keypads. Appl. Ergon. 1993, 24:289-290.