Memory for Everyday Objects: Where are the Digits on Numerical Keypads?

Applied Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 329-350

  Rinck, Mike ^a  

^a DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0348167497     PISSN: 08884080     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199908)13:4<329::AID-ACP583>3.0.CO;2-3     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Conway, M. A. (1991). In defense of everyday memory. American Psychologist, 46, 19-26.
2. Conrad, R. and Hull, A. J. (1968). The preferred layout for digit data-entry keysets. Ergonomics, 11, 165-173.
3. Craik, F. I. M. and Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684.
4. Fendrich, D. W., Healy, A. F. and Bourne Jr, L. E. (1991). Long-term repetition effects for motoric and perceptual procedures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 137-151.
5. Foos. P. W. (1989). Age differences in memory for two common objects. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 44, 178-180.
6. Gruneberg, M. M. and Morris, P. E. (1992). Applying memory research. In M. M. Gruneberg and P. E. Morris (Eds), Aspects of memory: Vol. 1, The practical aspects (pp. 1-17). London: Routledge.
7. Hacker, W. (1982). Action control: Task-dependent structure of action-controlling internal representations. In W. Hacker, W. Volpert and M. von Cranach (Eds), Cognitive and motivational aspects of goal-directed actions (pp. 137-158). Berlin: VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaftren.
8. Hacker, W. (1985). Activity: A fruitful concept in industrial psychology. In M. Frese and J. Sabini (Eds), Goal-directed behavior: The concept of action in psychology (pp. 262-283), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Jones, G. V. (1990). Misremembering a common object: When left is not right. Memory & Cognition, 18, 174-182.
10. Jones, G. V. and Martin, M. (1992). Misremembering a familiar object: Mnemonic illusion, not drawing bias. Memory & Cognition, 20, 211-213.
11. Kosslyn, S. M. (1994). Elements of graph design. New York: Freeman.
12. Loftus, E. F. (1997). Memory for a past that never was. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 6, 60-65.
13. Lutz, M. C. and Chapanis, A. (1955). Expected locations of digits and letters on ten-button keysets. Journal of Applied Psychology, 39, 314-317.
14. Martin, M. and Jones, G. V. (1995). Memory for orientation in the natural environment. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 279-288.
15. Martin, M. and Jones, G. V. (1998). Generalizing everyday memory: Signs and handedness. Memory & Cognition, 26, 193-200.
16. Morton, J. (1967). A singular lack of incident learning. Nature, 215, 203-204.
17. Nickerson, R. S. and Adams, M. J. (1979). Long-term memory for a common object. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 287-307.
18. Richardson, J. T. E. (1992). Remembering the appearance of familiar objects: A study of monarchic memory. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30, 389-392.
19. Rosenbaum, D. A. (1991). Human motor control. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
20. Rubin, D. C. and Kontis, T. C. (1983). A schema for common cents. Memory & Cognition, 11, 335-341.
21. Sanford, E. C. (1982). Professor Sanford's morning prayer. In U. Neisser (Ed.), Memory observed: Remembering in natural contexts (pp. 176-177). New York: Freeman.
22. Tulving, E. (1991). Memory research is not a zero-sum game. American Psychologist, 46, 41-42.