Erratum to: Larger mammals have longer faces because of size-related constraints on skull form (Nature Communications, (2013), 4, 1, (2458), 10.1038/ncomms3458);Larger mammals have longer faces because of size-related constraints on skull form

Nature Communications

Volumn 4, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Cardini, Andrea ^a,b,c,d   Polly, P David ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MODENA AND REGGIO EMILIA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HULL   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^e INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANTELOPE; CLADISTICS; FLYING FOX; MAMMAL; MONGOOSE; SCIURIDAE; SKULL; SMALL MAMMAL; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; ANIMAL; BAT; BODY SIZE; EVOLUTION; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; STATISTICAL MODEL; ARTICLE; HISTOLOGY;

HERPESTIDAE; MAMMALIA; SCIURUS;

ANIMALS; ANTELOPES; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; BODY SIZE; CHIROPTERA; FACE; FEMALE; HERPESTIDAE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, STATISTICAL; SCIURIDAE; SKULL; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84899041635     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-07156-3     Document Type: Erratum

References (47)

1. Evans, A. R. et al. The maximum rate of mammalian evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 4187-4190 (2012).
2. Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P., Jeffrey, J. E. & Richardson, M. K. Is sequence heterochrony an important evolutionary mechanism in mammals? J. Mammal. Evol. 10, 335-361 (2003).
3. Goswami, A. Cranial modularity shifts during mammalian evolution. Am. Nat. 168, 270-280 (2006).
4. Sánchez-Villagra, M. R. Developmental palaeontology in synapsids: the fossil record of ontogeny in mammals and their closest relatives. Proc. R. Soc. B 277, 1139-1147 (2010).
5. Goswami, A., Polly, P. D., Mock, O. B. & Sánchez-Villagra, M. R. Shape, variance and integration during craniogenesis: contrasting marsupial and placental mammals. J. Evol. Biol. 25, 862-872 (2012).
6. Porto, A., Oliveira, F. B., de, Shirai, L. T., Conto, V. D. & Marroig, G. The evolution of modularity in the mammalian skull I: morphological integration patterns and magnitudes. Evol. Biol. 36, 118-135 (2009).
7. Klingenberg, C. P. Cranial integration and modularity: insights into evolution and development from morphometric data. Hystrix It. J. Mammal. 24, 43-58 (2013).
8. Marroig, G., Shirai, L., Porto, A., de Oliveira, F. & De Conto, V. The evolution of modularity in the mammalian skull II: evolutionary consequences. Evol. Biol. 36, 136-148 (2009).
9. Emerson, S. B. & Bramble, D. M. Scaling, allometry, and skull design. The Skull. Vol. 3: Functional and Evolutionary Mechanisms (eds Hanken, J. & Hall, B. K.) 384-421 (Chicago University Press, Chicago, USA, 1993).
10. Hallgrimsson, B., Lieberman, D. E., Young, N. M., Parsons, T. & Wat, S. Evolution of covariance in the mammalian skull. Novartis Found. Symp. 284, 164-190 (2007).
11. Hallgrímsson, B., Lieberman, D. E., Liu, W., Ford-Hutchinson, A. F. & Jirik, F. R. Epigenetic interactions and the structure of phenotypic variation in the cranium. Evol. Dev. 9, 76-91 (2007).
12. Gould, S. J. Allometry and size in ontogeny and phylogeny. Biol. Rev. 41, 587-638 (1966).
13. Schluter, D. Adaptive radiation along genetic lines of least resistance. Evolution 50, 1766-1774 (1996).
14. Singleton, M. Functional shape variation in the cercopithecine masticatory complex. Mod. Morphometric. Phys. Anthropol. 319-348 (2005).
15. McKenna, M. C. & Bell, S. Classification of Mammals Above the Species Level (Columbia University Press, New York, USA, 1997).
16. Janis, C. M., Scott, K. M. & Jacobs, L. L. (eds) Evolution of Tertiary Mammals of North America (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, United Kingdom, 1998).
17. Werdelin, L. & Sanders, W. (eds) Cenozoic Mammals of Africa (University of California Press, Berkeley, California, USA, 2010).
18. Cheverud, J. M. Relationships among ontogenetic, static, and evolutionary allometry. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 59, 139-149 (1982).
19. Parsons, T. E. et al. Epigenetic integration of the developing brain and face. Dev. Dynam. 240, 2233-2244 (2011).
20. Marroig, G. & Cheverud, J. M. Size as a line of least evolutionary resistance: diet and adaptive morphological radiation in new world monkeys. Evolution 59, 1128-1142 (2005).
21. Kruska, D. C. T. & Sidorovich, V. E. Comparative allometric skull morphometrics in mink (Mustelavison Schreber, 1777) of Canadian and Belarus origin; taxonomic status. -Z. Saugetierkd68, 257-276 (2003).
22. Marcucio, R. S., Young, N. M., Hu, D. & Hallgrimsson, B. Mechanisms that underlie co-variation of the brain and face. Genesis 49, 177-189 (2011).
23. DeBeer, G. The Development of the Vertebrate Skull (Oxford University Press, London, United Kingdom, 1937).
24. Herring, S. W. Formation of the vertebrate face epigenetic and functional influences. Amer. Zool. 33, 472-483 (1993).
25. Martin, R. D., Genoud, M. & Hemelrijk, C. K. Problems of allometric scaling analysis: examples from mammalian reproductive biology. J. Exp. Biol. 208, 1731-1747 (2005).
26. Glazier, D. S. Beyond the '3/4-power law': variation in the intra-and interspecific scaling of metabolic rate in animals. Biol. Rev. 80, 611-662 (2005).
27. Zollikofer, C. P. E. & Ponce de León, M. S. The evolution of hominin ontogenies. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 21, 441-452 (2010).
28. Cardini, A. & Elton, S. Variation in guenon skulls (I): species divergence, ecological and genetic differences. J. Hum. Evol. 54, 615-637 (2008).
29. Cardini, A. & Elton, S. Geographical and taxonomic influences on cranial variation in red colobus monkeys (primates, colobinae): introducing a new approach to 'morph'monkeys. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 18, 248-263 (2009).
30. Cardini, A., Filho, J., Polly, P. & Elton, S. Biogeographic analysis using geometric morphometrics: clines in skull size and shape in a widespread African arboreal monkey. Morphometrics Nonmorphometricians 124, 191-217 (2010).
31. Viscosi, V. & Cardini, A. Leaf morphology, taxonomy and geometric morphometrics: a simplified protocol for beginners. PLoS One 6, e25630 (2011).
32. Klingenberg, C. P., Barluenga, M. & Meyer, A. Shape analysis of symmetric structures: quantifying variation among individuals and asymmetry. Evolution 56, 1909-1920 (2002).
33. Rohlf, F. J. & Slice, D. Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Syst. Biol. 39, 40-59 (1990).
34. Damuth, J. & MacFadden, B. J. Body Size in Mammalian Paleobiology: Estimation and Biological Implications (Cambridge University Press, 1990).
35. Dryden, I. L. & Mardia, K. V. Statistical Shape Analysis (John Wiley & Sons New York, 1998).
36. Mitteroecker, P., Gunz, P., Bernhard, M., Schaefer, K. & Bookstein, F. L. Comparison of cranial ontogenetic trajectories among great apes and humans. J. Hum. Evol. 46, 679-698 (2004).
37. Neubauer, S., Gunz, P. & Hublin, J. The pattern of endocranial ontogenetic shape changes in humans. J. Anat. 215, 240-255 (2009).
38. Adams, D. C. & Nistri, A. Ontogenetic convergence and evolution of foot morphology in European cave salamanders (family: Plethodontidae). BMC Evol. Biol. 10, 1-10 (2010).
39. Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P. et al. The delayed rise of present-day mammals. Nature 446, 507 (2007).
40. Collyer, M. L. & Adams, D. C. Analysis of two-state multivariate phenotypic change in ecological studies. Ecology 88, 683-692 (2007).
41. Goswami, A. & Polly, P. D. Methods for studying morphological integration, modularity, and covariance evolution. In:J. Alroy and G. Hunt (eds).Quant. Methods Paleobiol. 16, 213-243 (2010).
42. Klingenberg, C. P. MorphoJ: an integrated software package for geometric morphometrics. Mol. Ecol. Res. 11, 353-357 (2011).
43. Felsenstein, J. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125, 1-15 (1985).
44. Slice, D. E. Morpheus et al. Software for Morphometric Research (Stony Brook, New York: Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York, 1998).
45. O'Higgins, P. & Jones, N. Morphologika. Tools for Shape Analysis (University College London, London, United Kingdom, 1999).
46. Rohlf, F. J. NTSYSpc: Numerical taxonomy system, ver. 2.1 (Exeter Publishing, Ltd., Setauket, New York, USA, 2009).
47. Polly, P. D. Geometric Morphometrics for Mathematica, version 9.0 (Department of Geological Sciences Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA, 2012).