Collaboration and coordination in the context of informal care (CCCiC 2014)

Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 339-342

  Tellioglu, Hilda ^a   Lewkowicz, Myriam ^b   Fabiano, Aparecido ^a   De Carvalho, Pinatti ^a   Breškovic, Ivan ^a   Schorch, Marén ^c  

^a VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE TECHNOLOGIE DE TROYES   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SIEGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Best practice; Collaboration; Coordination; CSCW; Ethnographic study; Qualitative research; User centered design

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; USER CENTERED DESIGN;

BEST PRACTICES; COLLABORATION; COORDINATION; CSCW; ETHNOGRAPHIC STUDY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;

GROUPWARE;

EID: 84898952714     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2556420.2558862     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Magnusson, L. et al. 2002. Supporting Family Carers Through the Use of Information and Communication Technolgy\-The EU Project ACTION. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 39, 2002, 369-381.
2. Müller, S. et al. 2008. Eliciting User Requirements for Ambient Assisted Living: Results of the SOPRANO Project. In eChallenges 2008, Stockhilm, Sweden. IOS Press, Amsterdam, 81-88.
3. Nies, H.2004. A European Research Agenda or Integrated Care for Older People. 24 p.
4. Pochobradsky, E. et al. 2005. Situation pflegender Angehö rigerEndbericht Österreichisches Bundesinstitut für Gesundheitswesen (ÖBIG) im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für soziale Sicherheit, Generationen und Konsumentenschutz. 42 p.
5. Savage, S. and Bailey, S. 2004. The impact of caring on caregivers' mental health: a review of the literature. Australian Health Review. 27, 1, 7.
6. de Carvalho, A.F.P., Schinkinger, S., Breskovic, I., and Tellio?lu, H. 2013. Technology for Work-Life Balance in Terms of Informal Care Work. In ECSCW 2013 Workshop "CSCW at the Boundary of Work and Life", Paphos, Cyprus, 1-6.
7. Cranswick, K. and Dosman, D. 2008. Eldercare: What we know today. Canadian Social Trends. 86 (21.10.2008), 10.
8. Given, B.A. et al. 2001. Family support in advanced cancer. A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 51, 4, 19.
9. Chwalisz, K. and Kisler, V. 1995. Perceive Stress: A Better Measure of Carer Burden. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development. 28, 88-98.
10. Brouwer, W.B.F. et al. 2004. Burden of caregiving: Evidence of objective burden, subjective burden, and quality of life impacts on informal caregivers of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care &Research. 51, 4.
11. Coon, D. and Evans, B. 2009. Empirically Based Treatments for Family Carers Distress: What Works and Where do We Go From Hear. Geriatric Nursing. 30, 6, 426-436.
12. Breskovic, I., de Carvalho, A.F.P., Schinkinger, S., and Tellio?lu, H. 2013. Social Awareness Support for Meeting Informal Carers' Needs: Early Development in TOPIC. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW 2013), Paphos, Cyprus. Department of Computer Science Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark, 3-8.
13. Gaver, W.W. 2006. The Video Window: My Life with a Ludic System. Pers Ubiquit Comput 10, 60-65.
14. Podtschaske, B. et al. 2010. Nutzerabhängige Innovationsbarrieren im Bereich altersgerechter Assistenzsysteme,1 Studie im Rahmen der AALBegleitforschung des Bundesministeriums für Bildung und Forschung. Abschlussbericht.
15. Van Dijk, J. 2010. Conceptual Framework of the Study on the Social Impact of ICT, 1-30.
16. Niitamo, V.-P. et al. 2006. State-of-The-art and Good Practice in the Field of Living Labs. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising: Innovative Products and Services through Collaborative Networks, Milan, Italy, 349-357.
17. Budweg, S. et al. 2011. Enhancing Collaboration in Communities of Professionals Using a Living Lab Approach. Production Planning &Control. 22, 5.
18. Hlauschek, W. et al. 2009. Involvement of Elderly Citizens as Potential end Users of Assistive Technologies in the Living Lab Schwechat. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (PETRA '09). ACM, New York.
19. Harley, D. and Fitzpatrick, G. 2009. Creating a Conversational Context Through Video Blogging: Case Study of Geriatric 1927. Journal of Computers in Human Behavior, Special Issue 'Enabling Elderly Users to Create and Ahare Self Authored Multimedia Content'. 25, 3, 679-689.
20. Tixier, M. and Lewkowicz, M.I.E. 2009. Designing Social Support Online Services for Communities of Family Carers. In BIS Workshop. Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, 336-347.
21. Harley, D. and Fitzpatrick, G. 2009. YouTube and Intergenerational Communication: The case of Geriatric 1927. Universal Access in the Information Society. 8, 1.
22. Mu?ller, C. et al. 2010. Dealing with Wandering: A Case Study on Carers' Attitudes towards Privacy and Autonomy when Reflecting the Use of LBS. In GROUP 2010.
23. Rice, M. and Alm, N. 2007. Sociable TV: Exploring User-led Interaction Design for Older Adults. In Proceedings for the 5th European Conference on Interactive Television, Amsterdam, May 24-25.
24. Caplan, S.E. and Turner, J.S. 2007. Bringing Theory to Research on Computer-mediated Comforting Communication. Computers in Human Behavior. 23, 985-998.
25. Barnes, M.K. and Duck, S. 1994. Everyday Communicative Contexts for Social Support. In Communication of social support: Messages, interactions, relationships and communit, Burleson, B., Albrecht, T., and Sarason, I.G., (eds.). Sage, Thousand Oaks. p. 175-194