Spatial differentiation research of non-use value WTP based on the residents'ecological cognition: Taking the sanjiang plain as a case

Shengtai Xuebao/ Acta Ecologica Sinica

Volumn 34, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 1851-1859

  Gao, Qin ^a,b   Ao, Chang Lin ^b   Chen, Hong Guang ^b   Tong, Rui ^b  

^a SHANDONG INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b NORTHEAST AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Contingent valuation method (CVM); Ecological cognition; Non use value; Willing to pay (WTP)

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDINAL SURVEY; COGNITION; CONTINGENT VALUATION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY; NATURAL RESOURCE; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY; RESIDENT POPULATION; SPATIAL VARIATION; TREND ANALYSIS; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

CHINA; HEILONGJIANG; SANJIANG PLAIN;

EID: 84898951813     PISSN: 10000933     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5846/stxb201306031284     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Moon W, Griffith J.W. Assessing holistic economic value for multifunctional agriculture in the US. Food Policy, 2011, 36(4): 455-465.
2. Kotchen M J, Reiling S.D. Environmental attitudes, motivations, and contingent valuation of nonuse values: a case study involving endangered species. Ecological Economics, 2000, 32 (1): 93-107.
3. Nina H, Jukka K. Finnish citizens'attitudes towards Multifunctional agriculture. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 2006, 9(3): 9-22.
4. Concu G.B. Investigating distance effects on environmental values: a choice modelling approach. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 2007, 51(2): 175-194.
5. Sutherland R J, Walsh R.G. Effect of distance on the preservation value of water quality. Land Economics, 1985, 61(3): 281-291.
6. Hanink D.M. The economic geography in environmental issues: a spatial-analytic approach. Progress in Human Geography, 1995, 19(3): 372-387.
7. Loomis J.B. How large is the extent of the market for public goods: evidence from a nationwide Contingent Valuation survey. Applied Economics, 1996, 28(7): 779-782.
8. Xu Z X, Zhang J, Geoffrey W, Cao J, Zhang H.L. Research on influence of residents'place attachment on positive attitude to tourism with a mediator of development expectation: A case of core tourism community in Jiuzhaigou. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2009, 64(6): 736-744.
9. Abdullah S, Jeanty P.W. Willingness to pay for renewable energy: Evidence from a contingent valuation survey in Kenya. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2011, 15(6): 2974-2983.
10. Cheng S W, Zhang J, Hu J. Factors influencing local residents' attitude towards nature conservation in natural tourism destination: a comparative study on China's Jiuzhaigou National Park and UK's New Forest Nation Park. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30(23): 6487-6494.
11. Li Z L, Chen M Y, Wu Z L, Wang Q, Dong Y.H. Perception and attitude of rural community to the construction of Asian elephant conservation corridors in Xishuangbanna. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2009, 20(6): 1483-1487.
12. Feng L, Ao C L, Jiao Y. Influencing factors of the willingness to pay for Non-Use value evaluation of Sanjiang Wetland. Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 2012, 42(1): 59-67.
13. Ciriracy-Wantrup S.V. Capital returns from soil conservation practices. Journal of Farm Economics, 1947, 29(4): 1181-1196.
14. Davis R.K. Recreation planning as an economic problem. Natural Resources Journal, 1963, 3: 239-249.
15. Xu Z M, Zhang Z Q, Cheng G D, Su Z Y, Lu A X, Lin Q, Zhang H.T. Measuring the total economic value of restoring Ejina banners ecosystem service. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2002, 57 (1): 107-116.
16. Chen L, Ouyang Z Y, Wang X K, Miao H, Duan X.N. Applications of contingent valuation method in evaluation of non- market values. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2006, 26(2): 610-619.
17. Zhang Z Q, Xu Z M, Cheng G D, Su Z.Y. Contingent valuation of the economic benefits of restoring ecosystem services of Zhangye prefecture of Heihe River Basin. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2002, 22 (6): 885-893.
18. Ao C L, Li Y J, Feng L, Jiao Y. Evaluating the non-use value of sanjiang wetland based on contigent valuation method. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30(23): 6470-6477.
19. Moon W, Rimal A, Balasubramanian, SK Willingness-to-Accept and Willingness-to-Pay for GM and Non-GM Food: UK Consumers. Annual Meeting of American Agricultural Economics, 2004, (8): 1-4.
20. Bishop R C, Heberlien T.A. Measuring values of extramarket goods: Are indirect measures biased. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1979, 61(5): 926-930.
21. Hanemann W M, Kanninen B.J. The Statistical Analysis of Discrete-Response CV Data. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999: 302-441.
22. Hanemann W.M. Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1984, 66(3): 332-341.
23. Pate J, Loomis J. The effect of distance on willingness to pay values: a case study of wetlands and salmon in California. Ecological Economics, 1997, 20(3): 199-207.
24. Hanley N, Schläpfer F, Spurgeon J. Aggregating the benefits of environmental improvements: distance-decay functions for use and non-use values. Journal of Environmental Management, 2003, 68 (3): 297-304.
25. Bateman I J, Lovett A A, Brainard J.S. Developing a methodology for benefit transfers using geographical information systems: modeling demand for woodland recreation. Regional Studies, 1999, 33(3): 191-205.
26. Jiang Y, Swallow S K, McGonagle M.P. Contest-sensitive benefit transfer using stated choice models: specification and convergent validity for policy analysis. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2005, 31(4): 477-499.
27. Dunlap R E, Van Liere K.D. The new environmental paradigm: A proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. The Journal of Environmental Education, 1978, 9: 10-19.