Evaluating the non-use value of Sanjiang wetland based on contigent valuation method

Shengtai Xuebao/ Acta Ecologica Sinica

Volumn 30, Issue 23, 2010, Pages 6470-6477

  Ao, Changlin ^a,b   Li, Yijun ^a   Feng, Lei ^b   Jiao, Yang ^b  

^a HARBIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b NORTHEAST AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

CVM; Non use value; Principal component analysis; Sanjiang plain; Wetland

Indexed keywords

CONTINGENT VALUATION; DATA ACQUISITION; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; NATURAL RESOURCE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY; STATE ROLE; WETLAND; WETLAND MANAGEMENT;

CHINA; HEILONGJIANG; SANJIANG PLAIN;

EID: 79952712273     PISSN: 10000933     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bishop RC, Heberlein TA. Measuring values of extra-market goods; Are indirect methods biased?. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1981, 66(3): 926-930.
2. Davis RK. Recreation planning as an economic problem. Natural Resources Journal, 1963, (3):239-249.
3. Hanemann WM. Willingness to pay and willingness to accept; how much can they differ?. American Economic Review, 1991, 91: 635-647.
4. Zhang ZQ, Xu ZM, Cheng GD. Valuation of ecosystem services and natural capital. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2001, 21(11); 1918-1926.
5. Jiao Y, Ao CL. Research development of contingent value method in ecological environments evaluation. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University, 2008, 39(5): 131-136.
6. Zhang ZQ, Xu ZM, Cheng GD. The updated development and application of contingent valuation method(CVM). Advance in Earth Sciences, 2003, 18(3): 454-462.
7. Hanemann WM, Canninen B. The statistical analysis of discrete-response CV data. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics; University of California at Berkeley. Working Paper No. 798, 1996; 3-15.
8. Xu ZM, Zhang ZQ, Cheng GD. Measuring the total economic value of restoring Ejina banners ecosystem service. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2002, 57(1): 107-116.
9. Zhang ZQ, Xu ZM, Cheng GD. Contingent valuation of the economic benefits of restoring ecosystem services of Zhangye prefecture of Heihe river basin. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2002, 22(6): 885-893.
10. Jin JJ, Wang ZS, Ran SH. Comparison of contingent valuation and choice experiment in solid waste management programs in Macao. Ecological Economics, 2006, (57): 430-441.
11. Zhang MJ, Sun MP. Assessment of total economic value of preserving the ecological environment of Baotian Highway. Arid Land Geography, 2006, 29(6): 878-884.
12. Yan XB, Li YJ, Liang YC. Social benefit of China Earth Resource Satellite and its CVM evaluation method. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2009, 29(7): 69-76.
13. Xu JM. Study on evaluation and sustainable utilization of the wetlands in Yellow River Delta (Dongying). Beijing: The Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2001.
14. Arrow KR, Solow R, Portney PR. Report of the NOAA Panel on contingent valuation. Federal Register, 1993, 58(10): 4601-4644.
15. Czaja R, Blair J. Designing Surveys; A Guide to Decisions and Procedures. Chongqing University Publishing House, 2007; 116-126.
16. Chen L, Ouyang ZY, Wang XK. Applications of contingent valuation method in evaluation of non-market values. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2006, 26(2): 610-619.
17. Wang RX, Yan TW. Application and modification of CVM in China An empirical research coming from Wuhan. Journal of Natural Resources, 2006, 21(6): 879-887.
18. Hamid Adirnejad, Sadegh Khalilian. Estimating the existence value of north forest of Iran by using a contingent valuation method. Ecological Economics, 2006, (58): 665-675.
19. Sergio Colombo, Javier Calatrava-Requena, Nick Hanleyb. Analyzing the social benefits of soil conservation measures using stated preference methods. Ecological Economics, 2006, (58): 850-861.
20. Emmi Lehtonen, Jari Kuuluvainen. Non-market benefits of forest conservation in southern Finland. Ecological Economics, 2003, (6): 195-204.
21. Li JH, Guo YH. Principal Componnent evaluation a multivariate evaluate method expanded from principal component analysis. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2002, 1: 39-43.
22. Susan M Chilton, Diane Burgess, George Hutchinson W. The relative value of farm animal welfare. Ecological Economics, 2006, 59; 353-363.
23. Catherine M, Chambersl, John C, Whitehead. A contingent valuation estimate of the benefits of wolves in Minnesota. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2003, 26: 249-267.