How to see values in social computing: Methods for studying values dimensions

Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 426-435

  Shilton, Katie ^a   Koepfler, Jes A ^a   Fleischmann, Kenneth R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Research methods; Value sensitive design; Values in design

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK; DESIGN; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS;

HUMAN VALUES; SOCIAL COMPUTING; SOCIOTECHNICAL SYSTEMS; SURFACE VALUES; TECHNOLOGY DESIGNS; VALUE SENSITIVE DESIGN;

RESEARCH;

EID: 84898947534     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2531602.2531625     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (63)

1. Albrechtslund, A. Ethics and technology design. Ethics and Information Technology 9, 1 (2007), 63-72.
2. Alsheikh, T., Rode, J.A., and Lindley, S.E. (Whose) value-sensitive design: A study of long-distance relationships in an Arabic cultural context. Proc. CSCW 2011, ACM (2011), 75-84.
3. Ames, M.G., Go, J., Kaye, J., and Spasojevic, M. Understanding technology choices and values through social class. Proc. CSCW 2011 ACM (2011), 55-64.
4. Belman, J., Flanagan, M., Nissenbaum, H., and Diamond, J. Grow-A-Game: A tool for values conscious design and analysis of digital games. Proc. DiGRA 2011, (2011), 14-17.
5. Borning, A. and Muller, M. Next steps for value sensitive design. Proc. CHI 2012, ACM (2012), 1125-1134.
6. Brandt, E. and Messeter, J. Facilitating collaboration through design games. Proc. PDC 2004, Volume 1, ACM (2004), 121-131.
7. Brey, P. Method in computer ethics: Towards a multilevel interdisciplinary approach. Ethics and Information Technology 2, 2 (2000), 125-129.
8. Cheng, A.-S., Fleischmann, K.R., Wang, P., Ishita, E., and Oard, D.W. The role of innovation and wealth in the net neutrality debate: A content analysis of human values in congressional and FCC hearings. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63, 7 (2012), 1360-1373.
9. Cheng, A.-S. and Fleischmann, K.R. Developing a meta-inventory of human values. Proc. ASIST 2010 47, 1 (2010), 1-10.
10. Cockton, G. From quality in use to value in the world. Proc. CHI 2004, (2004), 1287-1290.
11. Fisher, E. Ethnographic invention: Probing the capacity of laboratory decisions. NanoEthics 1, 2 (2007), 155-165.
12. Flanagan, M., Nissenbaum, H., and Howe, D.C. Embodying values in technology: Theory and practice. In J. van den Hoven and J. Weckert, eds., Information Technology and Moral Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008, 322-353.
13. Fleischmann, K.R., Cheng, A.-S., Templeton, T.C., et al. Content analysis for values elicitation. Proc. CHI 2012, Workshop on Methods for Accounting for Values in Human-Centered Computing, ACM (2012).
14. Fleischmann, K.R., Wallace, W.A., and Grimes, J.M. How values can reduce conflicts in the design process: Results from a multi-site mixed-method field study. Proc. ASIST 2011, 48, 1 (2011), 1-10.
15. Fleischmann, K.R. and Wallace, W.A. Ensuring transparency in computational modeling. Commun. ACM 52, 3 (2009), 131-134.
16. Fleischmann, K.R. and Wallace, W.A. Value conflicts in computational modeling. Computer 43, 7 (2010), 57-63.
17. Fleischmann, K.R. Digital libraries and human values: Human?computer interaction meets social informatics. Proc. ASIST 2008, 44, 1 (2008), 1-17.
18. Forsythe, D.E. Studying those who study us: An anthropologist in the world of artificial intelligence. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA, 2002.
19. Friedman, B. and Hendry, D.G. The envisioning cards: A toolkit for catalyzing humanistic and technical imaginations. Proc. CHI 2012, ACM (2012), 1145-1148.
20. Friedman, B., Kahn, P.H., and Borning, A. Value sensitive design and information systems. In D. Galletta and P. Zhang, eds., Human-Computer Interaction and Management Information Systems: Applications. M.E. Sharpe, New York, 2006.
21. Friedman, B. and Nissenbaum, H. Bias in computer systems. In B. Friedman, ed., Human values and the design of computer technology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York, 1997, 21-40.
22. Friedman, B., ed. Human values and the design of computer technology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York, 1997.
23. Guston, D.H. and Sarewitz, D. Real-time technology assessment. Technology in Society 24, 1-2 (2002), 93-109.
24. Halpern, M.K., Erickson, I., Forlano, L., and Gay, G.K. Designing collaboration: comparing cases exploring cultural probes as boundary-negotiating objects. Proc. CSCW 2013, ACM (2013), 1093-1102.
25. Haraway, D. The cyborg manifesto and fractured identities. In Social Theory: The Multicultural &Classic Readings. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 1985, 597-604.
26. Himma, K.E. A dualist analysis of abortion: Personhood and the concept of self qua experiential subject. Journal of Medical Ethics 31, 1 (2005), 48-55.
27. Ishita, E., Oard, D.W., Fleischmann, K.R., Cheng, A.-S., and Templeton, T.C. Investigating multi-label classification for human values. Proc. ASIST 2010,47, 1 (2010), 1-4.
28. Kaptelinin, V. and Nardi, B. Affordances in HCI: toward a mediated action perspective. Proc. CHI 2012, ACM (2012), 967-976.
29. Kelty, C.M. Two bits: The cultural significance of free software. Duke University Press, Durham, NC, 2008.
30. Knobel, C.P. and Bowker, G.C. Values in design. Communications of the ACM 54, 2011, 26-28.
31. Koepfler, J.A. and Fleischmann, K.R. Studying the values of hard-to-reach populations: content analysis of tweets by the 21st century homeless. Proc. iConference 2012, ACM (2012), 48-55.
32. Koepfler, J.A., Shilton, K., and Fleischmann, K.R. A stake in the issue of homelessness: Identifying values of interest for design in online communities. Proc. C&T 2013, ACM (2013).
33. Le Dantec, C.A. and Edwards, W.K. Designs on dignity: perceptions of technology among the homeless. Proc. CHI 2008, ACM (2008), 627-636.
34. Le Dantec, C.A.L., Poole, E.S., and Wyche, S.P. Values as lived experience: evolving value sensitive design in support of value discovery. Proc. CHI 2009, ACM (2009), 1141-1150.
35. Lin, P., Abney, K., and Bekey, G. Robot ethics: Mapping the issues for a mechanized world. Artificial Intelligence 175, 5-6 (2011), 942-949.
36. Lofland, J., Snow, D., Anderson, L., and Lofland, L.H. Analyzing social settings: a guide to qualitative observation and analysis. Wadsworth/Thomson Learning, Belmont, CA, 2006.
37. MacKenzie, D. An engine, not a camera: how financial models shape markets. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA and London, 2008.
38. Manders-Huits, N. and Zimmer, M. Values and pragmatic action: The challenges of introducing ethical intelligence in technical and design communities. International Review of Information Ethics 10, (2009), 37-44.
39. Nissenbaum, H. Privacy in context: Technology, policy, and the integrity of social life. Stanford Law Books, Stanford, CA, 2009.
40. Nissenbaum, H. From preemption to circumvention: if technology regulates, why do we need regulation (and vice versa)? Berkeley Technology Law Journal 26, 3 (2011), 1367-1386.
41. Plowman, T. Ethnography and critical design practice. In B. Laurel, ed., Design research: methods and perspectives. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2003.
42. Pollock, N. and Williams, R. The business of expectations: How promissory organizations shape technology and innovation. Social Studies of Science 40, 4 (2010), 525-548.
43. Poole, E.S., Le Dantec, C.A., Eagan, J.R., and Edwards, W.K. Reflecting on the invisible: understanding end-user perceptions of ubiquitous computing. Proc. UBICOMP 2008, ACM (2008), 192-201.
44. Postigo, H. Questioning the Web 2.0 discourse: Social roles, production, values, and the case of the human rights portal. The Information Society 27, 3 (2011), 181-193.
45. Rabinow, P. and Bennett, G. Ars synthetica: Designs for human practice. Rice University Connexions Web site, Houston, TX, 2008.
46. Roberson, J. and Nardi, B. Survival needs and social inclusion: technology use among the homeless. Proc. CSCW 2010, ACM (2010), 445-448.
47. Rokeach, M. The nature of human values. Free Press, New York, 1973.
48. Saab, D.J. An ethnorelative framework for information system design. Proc. AMCIS 2008, Association for Information Systems (2008), 1-14.
49. Schuler, D. Social computing. Communications of the ACM 37, 1 (1994), 28-29.
50. Schwartz, S.H. Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna, ed., Advances in experimental social psychology. Academic Press, New York, 1992, 1-65.
51. Schwartz, S.H. Value orientations: Measurement, antecedents and consequences across nations. In R. Jowell, C. Roberts, C. Fitzgerald and G. Eva, eds., Measuring attitudes cross-nationally: Lessons from the European Social Survey. Sage Publications, London, 2007, 169-203.
52. Sengers, P., Boehner, K., David, S., and Kaye, J. Reflective design. Proc. Critical computing 2005: between sense and sensibility, ACM (2005), 49-58.
53. Shilton, K., Koepfler, J.A., and Fleischmann, K.R. Charting sociotechnical dimensions of values for design research. The Information Society 29, 5 (2013).
54. Shilton, K. This is an intervention: Foregrounding and operationalizing ethics during technology design. In Emerging Pervasive Information and Communication Technologies (PICT). Ethical Challenges, Opportunities and Safeguards. Springer, New York, In Press.
55. Shilton, K. Values levers: Building ethics into design. Science, Technology &Human Values 38, 3 (2013), 374-397.
56. Siegrist, M., Cvetkovich, G., and Roth, C. Salient value similarity, social trust, and risk/benefit perception. Risk Analysis 20, 3 (2000), 353-362.
57. Suchman, L. Do categories have politics? The language/action perspective reconsidered. In B. Friedman, ed., Human values and the design of computer technology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York, 1997, 91-105.
58. Templeton, T.C. and Fleischmann, K.R. The relationship between human values and attitudes toward the Park51 and nuclear power controversies. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 48, 1 (2011), 1-10.
59. van der Burg, S. Imagining the future of photoacoustic mammography. Science and Engineering Ethics 15, 1 (2009), 97-110.
60. Verbeek, P.-P. Materializing morality. Science, Technology &Human Values 31, 3 (2006), 361-380.
61. Wang, F.-Y., Carley, K.M., Zeng, D., and Mao, W. Social computing: from social informatics to social intelligence. IEEE Intelligent Systems 22, 2 (2007), 79-83.
62. Winner, L. Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus 109, 1 (1980), 121-136.
63. Wohlsen, M. To beat Amazon, Walmart is treating its stores like apps. Wired.com, 2013. http://www.wired.com/business/2013/03/walmart-treatsstores- like-Apps/.