Generalizable relational binding from coarse-coded distributed representations

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages

  O'Reilly, Randall C ^a   Busby, Richard S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COARSE-CODED DISTRIBUTED REPRESENTATIONS; DISTRIBUTED REPRESENTATION; HIDDEN UNITS; HIGH-DIMENSIONAL; SPATIAL DOMAINS; SYSTEMATICITY; TUNING CURVE;

EID: 84898942206     PISSN: 10495258     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Elman, J. L. (1991). Distributed representations, simple recurrent networks, and grammatical structure. Machine Learning, 7, 195-225.
2. Gray, C. M., Engel, A. K., Konig, P., & Singer, W. (1992). Synchronization of oscillatory neuronal responses in cat striate cortex - Temporal properties. Visual Neuroscience, 8, 337-347.
3. Hinton, G. E., McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1986). Distributed representations. In D. E. Rumelhart, J. L. McClelland, & PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing. Volume 1: Foundations (Chap. 3, pp. 77-109). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Holyoak, K. J., & Hummel, J. E. (2000). The proper treatment of symbols in a connectionist architecture. In E. Dietrich, & A. Markman (Eds.), Cognitive dynamics: Conceptual and representational change in humans and machines. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Hummel, J. E., & Holyoak, K. J. (1997). Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping. Psychological Review, 104(3), 427-466.
6. Mel, B. A., & Fiser, J. (2000). Minimizing binding errors using learned conjunctive features. Neural Computation, 12, 731-762.
7. O'Reilly, R. C. (1998). Six principles for biologically-based computational models of cortical cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(11), 455-462.
8. O'Reilly, R. C. (2001). Generalization in interactive networks: The benefits of inhibitory competition and Hebbian learning. Neural Computation, 13, 1199-1242.
9. O'Reilly, R. C., & Munakata, Y. (2000). Computational explorations in cognitive neuroscience: Understanding the mind by simulating the brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
11. Shastri, L., & Ajjanagadde, V. (1993). From simple associations to systematic reasoning: A connectionist representation of rules, variables, and dynamic bindings using temporal synchrony. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 417-494.
12. St John, M. F., & McClelland, J. L. (1990). Learning and applying contextual constraints in sentence comprehension. Artificial Intelligence, 46, 217-257.
13. Touretzky, D. S. (1986). BoltzCONS: Reconciling connectionism with the recursive nature of stacks and trees. Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 522- 530). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. von der Malsburg, C. (1981). The correlation theory of brain function. MPI Biophysical Chemistry, Internal Report 81-2. In E. Domany, J. L. van Hemmen, & K. Schulten (Eds.), Models of neural networks, II (1994). Berlin: Springer.
15. Wickelgren, W. A. (1969). Context-sensitive coding, associative memory, and serial order in (speech) behavior. Psychological Review, 76, 1-15.