Do females invest more into eggs when males sing more attractively? Postmating sexual selection strategies in a monogamous reed passerine

Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 4, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 1328-1339

  Krištofík, Ján ^a   Darolová, Alžbeta ^a   Majtan, Juraj ^a,b   Okuliarová, Monika ^c   Zeman, Michal ^c   Hoi, Herbert ^d  

^a INSTITUTE OF CHEMISTRY   (Slovakia)

^b SLOVAK MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Slovakia)

^c Physics and Informatics   (Slovakia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF VETERINARY MEDICINE   (Austria)

Author keywords

Acrocephalus scirpaceus; Egg yolk testosterone; Lysozyme; Male quality; Song

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898928698     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20457758     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1034     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Airey, D. C., K. L. Buchanan, T. Szekely, C. K. Catchpole, and T. J. DeVoogd 2000. Song, sexual selection, and a song control nucleus (HVc) in the brains of European sedge warblers. J. Neurobiol. 44:1-6.
2. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
3. Bolund, E., H. Schielzeth, and W. Forstmeier 2009. Compensatory investment in zebra finches: females lay larger eggs when paired to sexually unattractive males. Proc. R. Soc. B 276:707-715.
4. Bonato, M., M. R. Evans, and M. I. Cherry 2009. Investment in eggs is influenced by male coloration in the ostrich, Struthio camelus. Anim. Behav. 77:1027-1032.
5. Botero, C. A., N. J. Boogert, S. L. Vehrencamp, and I. J. Lovette 2009. Climatic patterns predict the elaboration of song displays in Mockingbirds. Curr. Biol. 19:1151-1155.
6. Buchanan, K. L., and C. K. Catchpole 1997. Female choice in the sedge warbler, Acrocephalus schoenobaenus: multiple cues from song and territory quality. Proc. R. Soc. B 264:521-526.
7. Buchanan, K. L., and C. K. Catchpole 2000. Song as an indicator of male parental effort in the sedge warbler. Proc. R. Soc. B 267:321-326.
8. Byers, B. E., and D. E. Kroodsma 2009. Female mate choice and song bird song repertoires. Anim. Behav. 77:13-22.
9. Catchpole, C. K. 1996. Song and female choice: good genes and big brains? Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:358-360.
10. Catchpole, C. K., and P. J. B. Slater 1995. Bird song. Biological themes and variations. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
11. Catchpole, C. K., J. Dittami, and B. Leisler 1984. Differential responses to male song repertoires in female songbirds implanted with oestradiol. Nature 312:563-564.
12. Charter, E. A., and G. Lagarde 1999. Lysozyme and other proteins in eggs. Pp. 1582-1587 in C. A. Batt, R. K. Robinson, P. Patel and P. D. Patel, eds. Encyclopedia of food microbiology. Academic Press, Adelaide, London and New York.
13. Cramp, S. 1992. Handbook of the birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa. The birds of Western Palearctic, vol. VI Warblers. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford and New York.
14. Cunningham, J. A., and A. F. Russell 2000. Egg investment is influenced by male attractiveness in the mallard. Nature 404:74-77.
15. D'Alba, L., M. D. Shawkey, P. Korsten, O. Vedder, S. A. Kingma, J. Komdeur, et al. 2010. Differential deposition of antimicrobial proteins in blue tit (Cyanistes caeruleus) clutches by laying order and male attractiveness. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 64:1037-1045.
16. Darolová, A., J. Krištofík, H. Hoi, and M. Wink 2012. Song complexity in male marsh warblers: does it reflect male quality? J. Ornithol. 153:431-439.
17. Dentressangle, F., L. Boeck, and R. Torres 2008. Maternal investment in eggs is affected by male feet colour and breeding conditions in the blue-footed booby, Sula nebouxii. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 62:1899-1908.
18. DeVoogd, T. J. 2004. Neural constraints on the complexity of avian song. Brain Behav. Evol. 63:221-232.
19. Fessl, B., and H. Hoi 1996. The significance of a two part song in the moustached warbler (Acrocephalus melanopogon). Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 8:265-278.
20. Garcia-Fernandez, V., M. Amy, M. Lacroix, G. Malacarne, and G. Leboucher 2010. Eavesdropping on male singing interactions leads to differential allocation in eggs. Ethology 116:662-670.
21. Garcia-Fernandez, V., T. I. Draganoiu, D. Ung, A. Lacroix, G. Malacarne, and G. Leboucher 2013. Female canaries invest more in response to an exaggerated male trait. Anim. Behav. 85:679-684.
22. Gil, D., and M. Gahr 2002. The honesty of bird song: multiple constraints for multiple traits. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:133-141.
23. Gil, D., G. Leboucher, A. Lacroix, R. Cue, and M. Kreutzer 2004. Female canaries produce eggs with greater amount of testosterone when exposed to preferred male song. Horm. Behav. 45:64-70.
24. Gil, D., P. Ninni, A. Lacroix, F. De Lope, C. Tirard, A. Marzal, et al. 2006. Yolk androgens in the barn swallow (Hirundo rustica): a test of some adaptive hypotheses. J. Evol. Biol. 19:123-131.
25. Gil, D., C. Biard, A. Lacroix, C. N. Spottiswoode, N. Saino, M. Puerta, et al. 2007. Evolution of yolk androgens in birds: development, coloniality, and sexual dichromatism. Am. Nat. 169:802-819.
26. Gilbert, L., K. A. Williamson, N. Hazon, and J. A. Graves 2006. Maternal effects due to male attractiveness affect offspring development in the zebra finch. Proc. R. Soc. B 273:1765-1771.
27. Giraudeau, M., C. Duval, G. Á. Czirják, V. Bretagnolle, C. Eraud, K. J. McGraw, et al. 2011. Maternal investment of female mallards is influenced by male carotenoid-based coloration. Proc. R. Soc. B 278:781-788.
28. Gowaty, P. A. 2008. Reproductive compensation. J. Evol. Biol. 21:1189-1200.
29. Grafen, A. 1990. Biological signals as handicaps. J. Theor. Biol. 102:549-567.
30. Griggio, M., F. Valera, A. Casas-Crivillé, H. Hoi, and A. Barbosa 2011. White tail markings are an indicator of quality and affect mate preference in rock sparrows. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 65:655-664.
31. Hargitai, R., M. Herényi, and J. Török 2008. Eggshell colouration in relation to female condition, male attractiveness and egg quality in the collared flycatcher (Ficedula albicollis). J. Avian Biol. 39:413-422.
32. Hiebert, S. M., P. K. Stoddard, and P. Arcese 1989. Repertoire size, territory acquisition and reproductive success in the song sparrow. Anim. Behav. 37:266-273.
33. Holvec, M. J., and K. Riebel 2010. Low quality females prefer low-quality males when choosing a mate. Proc. R. Soc. B 277:153-160.
34. Horváthová, T., S. Nakagawa, and T. Uller 2012. Strategic female reproductive investment in response to male attractiveness in birds. Proc. R. Soc. B 279:163-170.
35. Kipper, S., R. Mundry, C. Sommer, H. Hultsch, and D. Todt 2006. Song repertoire size is correlated with body measures and arrival date in common nightingales, Luscinia megarhynchos. Anim. Behav. 71:211-217.
36. Krištofík, J., A. Darolová, M. Griggio, J. Majtan, M. Okuliarová, L. Zídková, et al. 2013. Does egg colouration signal female and egg quality in reed warbler (Acrocephalus scirpaceus)? Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 25:129-143.
37. Leisler, B., and K. Schulze-Hagen 2011. The reed warblers: diversity in a uniform bird family. KNNV, Uitgeverij, Zeist.
38. Leitner, S., and C. K. Catchpole 2007. Song and brain development in canaries raised under different conditions of acoustic and social isolation over two years. Develop. Neurobiol. 67:1478-1487.
39. Lessells, K., and T. Boag 1987. Unrepeatable repeatabilities: a common mistake. Auk 104:116-121.
40. Lipar, J. L., and E. D. Ketterson 2000. Maternally derived yolk testosterone enhances the development of the hatching muscle in the red-winged blackbird Agelaius phoeniceus. Proc. R. Soc. B 267:2005-2010.
41. Loyau, A., and F. Lacroix 2010. Watching sexy displays improves hatching success and offspring growth through maternal allocation. Proc. R. Soc. B 277:3453-3460.
42. Loyau, A., M. Saint Jalme, R. Mauget, and G. Sorci 2007. Male sexual attractiveness affects the investment of maternal resources into the eggs in peafowl (Pavo cristatus). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 61:1043-1052.
43. Lozano, G. A. 1994. Size, condition, and territory ownership in male tree swallows (Tachycinetta bicolour). Can. J. Zool. 72:330-333.
44. Majtan, J., J. Klaudiny, J. Bohova, L. Kohutova, M. Dzurova, M. Sediva, et al. 2012. Methylglyoxal-induced modifications of significant honeybee proteinous components in manuka honey: possible therapeutic implications. Fitoterapia 83:671-677.
45. Marshall, R. C., B. Leisler, C. K. Catchpole, and H. Schwabl 2005. Male song quality affects circulating but not yolk steroids concentrations in female canaries (Serinus canaria). J. Exp. Biol. 208:4593-4598.
46. Marshall, R. C., K. L. Buchanan, and C. K. Catchpole 2007. Song and female choice for extrapair copulations in the sedge warbler, Acrocephalus schoenobaenus. Anim. Behav. 73:629-635.
47. Mcfarlane, M. L., M. I. Cherry, and M. R. Evans 2010. Female Cape sugarbirds (Promerops cafer) modify egg investment both for extra-pair mates and for male tail length. J. Evol. Biol. 23:1998-2003.
48. Michl, G., J. Török, P. Péczely, L. Z. Garamszegi, and H. Schwabl 2005. Female collared flycatchers adjust yolk testosterone to male age, but not to attractiveness. Behav. Ecol. 16:383-388.
49. Moreno, J., E. Lobato, J. Morales, S. Merino, G. Tomás, J. Martínez-de la Puente, et al. 2006. Experimental evidence that egg color indicates female condition at laying in a songbird. Behav. Ecol. 17:651-655.
50. Mousseau, T. A., and C. W. Fox, eds. 1998. Maternal effects as adaptations. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
51. Müller, W., and M. Eens 2009. Elevated yolk androgen levels and the expression of multiple sexually selected male characters. Horm. Behav. 55:175-181.
52. Müller, W., J. Vergauwen, and M. Eens 2008. Yolk testosterone, postnatal growth and song in male canaries. Horm. Behav. 54:125-133.
53. Nowicki, S., D. Hasselquist, S. Bensch, and S. Peters 2000. Nestling growth and song repertoire size in great reed warblers: evidence for song learning as an indicator mechanism in mate choice. Proc. R. Soc. B 267:2419-2424.
54. Okanoya, K., and M. Soma 2013. Differential allocation in relation to mate song quality in the Bengalese finch. Behaviour 150:1491-1508.
55. Okuliarová, M., B. Sárniková, S. Rettenbacher, P. Skrobánek, and M. Zeman 2010. Yolk testosterone and corticosterone in hierarchical follicles and laid eggs of Japanese quail exposed to long-term restraint stress. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 165:91-96.
56. Petrie, M., and A. Williams 1993. Peahens lay more eggs for peacocks with larger trains. Proc. R. Soc. B 251:127-131.
57. Pfaff, J. A., L. Zanette, S. A. MacDougall-Shackleton, and E. A. MacDougall-Shackleton 2007. Song repertoire size varies with HVC volume and is indicative of male quality in song sparrows (Melospiza melodia). Proc. R. Soc. B 274:2035-2040.
58. Pike, T. W., and M. Petrie 2005. Offspring sex ratio is related to paternal train elaboration and yolk corticosterone in peakfowl. Biol. Lett. 1:204-207.
59. Ratikainen, I. H., and H. Kokko 2010. Differential allocation and compensation: who deserves the silver spoon? Behav. Ecol. 21:195-200.
60. Reid, J. M., P. Arcese, A. L. E. V. Cassidy, S. M. Hiebert, J. N. M. Smith, P. K. Stoddard, et al. 2005a. Fitness correlates of song repertoire size in free-living song sparrows (Melospiza melodia). Am. Nat. 165:299-310.
61. Reid, J. M., P. Arcese, A. L. E. V. Cassidy, A. B. Marr, J. N. M. Smith, and L. F. Keller 2005b. Hamilton and Zuk meet heterozygosity? Song repertoire size indicates inbreeding and immunity in song sparrows (Melospiza melodia). Proc. R. Soc. B 272:481-487.
62. Remeš, V. 2011. Yolk androgens in great tit eggs are related to male attractiveness, breeding density and territory quality. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 65:1257-1266.
63. Safran, R. J., K. M. Pilz, K. J. McGraw, S. M. Correa, and H. Schwabl 2008. Are yolk androgens and carotenoids in barn swallow eggs related to parental quality? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 62:427-438.
64. Saino, N., V. Bertacche, R. P. Ferrari, R. Martinelli, A. P. Møller, and R. Stradi 2002a. Carotenoid concentration in barn swallow eggs is influenced by laying order, maternal infection, and paternal ornamentation. Proc. R. Soc. B 269:1729-1733.
65. Saino, N., P. Dall'Ara, R. Martinelli, and A. P. Møller 2002b. Early maternal effects and antibacterial immune factors in the eggs, nestlings and adults of the barn swallow. J. Evol. Biol. 15:735-743.
66. Saino, N., R. P. Ferrari, R. Martinelli, M. Romano, D. Rubolini, and A. P. Møller 2002c. Early maternal effects mediated by immunity depend on sexual ornamentation of the male partner. Proc. R. Soc. B 269:1005-1009.
67. Saino, N., R. Martinelli, C. Biard, D. Gil, C. Spottiswoode, P. F. Surai, et al. 2007. Maternal immune factors and the evolution of secondary sexual characters. Behav. Ecol. 18:513-520.
68. Schwabl, H. 1996. The contents of maternal testosterone in house sparrows Passer domesticus eggs vary with breeding conditions. Naturwissenschaften 84:406-408.
69. Searcy, W. A., and K. Yasukawa 1990. Use of the song repertoire in intersexual and intrasexual contexts by male red-winged blackbirds. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 27:123-128.
70. Sheldon, B. C. 2000. Differential allocation: tests, mechanisms and implications. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15:397-402.
71. Smith, R. R., and F. R. Moore 2005. Arrival and seasonal reproductive performance in long-distance migratory landbird. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 57:231-239.
72. Tonra, C. M., P. P. Marra, and R. L. Holberton 2011. Migration phenology and winter habitat quality are related to circulating androgen in long-distance migratory bird. J. Avian Biol. 42:397-404.
73. Uller, T., J. Eklöf, and S. Andersson 2005. Female egg investment in relation to male sexual traits and the potential for transgenerational effects in sexual selection. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 57:584-590.
74. Vallarino, A., N. Evans, F. Daunt, S. Wanless, and R. Nager 2012. Egg components vary independently of each other in the facultative siblicidal Black-legged Kittiwake Rissa tridactyla. J. Ornithol. 153:513-523.
75. Williamson, K. A., P. F. Surai, and J. A. Graves 2006. Yolk antioxidants and mate attractiveness in the zebra finch. Funct. Ecol. 20:354-359.
76. Zahavi, A. 1975. Mate selection - a selection for a handicap. J. Theor. Biol. 67:603-605.
77. Zeman, M., J. Košutzký, and E. Bobáková 1986. Testosterone concentration in the seminal plasma of cocks. Br. Poult. Sci. 27:261-266.