Toward the third level of agenda-setting theory: A network agenda setting model

Agenda Setting in a 2.0 World: New Agendas in Communication

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 112-133

  Guo, Lei ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898913518     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203735879     Document Type: Chapter

References (46)

1. Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2. Anderson, J. R., & Bower, G. H. (1973). Human associative memory. Washington, DC: Winston.
3. Armstrong, D. M. (1973). Belief, truth, and knowledge. London: Cambridge University Press.
4. Barsalou, L. (1998). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 557-660.
5. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
6. Braddon-Mitchell, D., & Jackson, F. (2007). Philosophy of mind and cognition (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
7. Buzan, T., & Buzan, B. (1996). The mind map book: How to use radiant thinking to maximize your brain’s untapped potential. New York: Plume.
8. Campo-Flores, A. (2010, May 13). Why Americans think (wrongly) that illegal immigrants hurt the economy? Newsweek.
9. Carroll, M., & Kirsner, K. (1982). Context and repetition effects in lexical decision and recognition memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 55-69.
10. Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 402-408.
11. Cortese, J. (2007). Internet learning and the building of knowledge. Youngstown, NY: Cambria Press.
12. Craik, F. I. M., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104(3), 268-294.
13. Cummins, R. (1996). Representations, targets, and attitudes. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.
14. Eveland, W. P., Jr. (2001). The cognitive mediation model of learning from the news: Evidence from nonelection, off-year election, and presidential election contexts. Communication Research, 28, 571-601.
15. Ghanem, S. (1997). Filling in the tapestry: The second level of agenda setting. In Maxwell McCombs, Donald Shaw, & David Weaver (Eds.), Communication and democracy: Exploring the intellectual frontiers in agenda-setting theory (pp. 3-14). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Graber, D. A., & Smith, J. M. (2005). Political communication faces the 21st century. Journal of Communication, 55(3), 479-507.
17. Guo, L., & McCombs, M. (2011a). Network agenda setting: A third level of media effects. Paper accepted for presentation to the ICA annual conference, Boston.
18. Guo, L., & McCombs, M. (2011b). Toward the third level of agenda setting theory: A network agenda setting model. Paper accepted for presentation to the AEJMC annual conference, St. Louis.
19. Harris, H. R. (2011). Tavis Smiley: Obama must do more to live up to King’s ideals. Retrieved from The Washington Post website: http://voices.washingtonpost. com/44/2011/01/tavis-smiley-obama-must-do-mor.html
20. Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133-168). New York: Guilford.
21. Kaplan, S. (1973). Cognitive maps in perception and thought. In R. M. Downs & D. Stea (Eds.), Image and Environment: Cognitive mapping and spacial behavior (pp. 63-78). Chicago, IL: Aldine.
22. Kim, K., & McCombs, M. (2007). News story descriptions and the public’s opinions of political candidates. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 84(2), 299-314.
23. Kiousis, S. (2005). Compelling arguments and attitude strength: Exploring the impact of second-level agenda setting on public opinion of presidential candidate images. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 10(2), 3-27.
24. Kitchin, R. M. (1994). Cognitive maps: What are they and why study them? Journal of Environmental Psychology 14, 1-19.
25. Lang, A. (2000). The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. Journal of Communication, 50(1), 46-71.
26. Lindsay, P., & Norman, D. A. (1977). Human information processing: An introduction to psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.
27. Lippmann, W. (1922). Public opinion. New York: Macmillan.
28. McCombs, M. (2004). Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
29. McCombs, M., & Ghanem, S. (2001). The convergence of agenda setting and framing. In S. Reese, O. Gandy & A. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life (pp. 67-81). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30. McCombs, M., Lopez-Escobar, E., & Llamas, J. P. (2000). Setting the agenda of attributes in the 1996 Spanish general election. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 77-92.
31. McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). Agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176-187.
32. McCutchin, M. (2008). Creative problem-solving/Ideation techniques. PowerPoint Presentation for the Class “Creative Strategy”: The University of Texas at Austin.
33. Monroe, B. M., & Read, S. J. (2008). A general connectionist model of attitude structure and change:The ACS (Attitudes as Constraint Satisfaction) Model. Psychological Review, 11(3), 733-759.
34. Price, V., & Tewksbury, D. (1997). News values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming and framing. In G. A. Barett & F. J. Boster (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences: Advances in persuasion (Vol. 13, pp. 173-212). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
35. Rumelhart, D. E., & Norman, D. A. (1978). Accretion, tuning and restructuring: Three modes of learning. In J. W. Cotton & R. Klatzky (Eds.), Semantic factors in cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Santanen, E., Briggs, R., & de Vreede, G.-J. (2000). The cognitive network model of creativity: A new causal model of creativity and a new brainstorming technique. In R. H. Spraque (Ed.), Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society Press.
37. Schacter, D. L. (1987). Implicit memory: History and current status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13(3), 501-518.
38. Schacter, D. L., & Graf, P. (1986). Effects of elaborative processing on implicit and explicit memory for new associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12(3), 432-444.
39. Schoenbach, K., & Semetko, H. A. (1992). Agenda-setting, agenda reinforcing or agenda-deflating? A study of the 1990 German national election. Journalism Quarterly, 69(4), 837-846.
40. Severin, W. J., & Tankard, J. W. (2001). Communication theories: Origins, methods, and uses in the mass media (5th ed.). New York: Longman.
41. Shaw, D. L., & McCombs, M. (1977). The emergence of American political issues: The agenda-setting function of the press. St. Paul, MN: West.
42. Siegel, A. W., & Cousins, J. H. (1985). The symbolizing and symbolised child in the enterprise of cognitive mapping. In R. Cohen (Ed.), The development of spatial cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawerence Erlbaum.
43. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44. Weaver, D. H., Graber, D. A., McCombs, M., & Eyal, C. H. (1981). Media agenda-setting in a presidential election: Issues, images, and interest. New York: Praeger.
45. Williams, W., Jr., Shapiro, M., & Cutbirth, C. (1983). The impact of campaign agendas in perceptions of issues in the 1980 campaign. Journalism Quarterly, 60, 226-231.
46. Yioutas, J., & Segvic, I. (2003). Revisiting the Clinton/Lewinsky scandal: The convergence of agenda setting and framing. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 80(3), 567-582.