Study on the thin film composite poly(piperazine-amide) nanofiltration membrane: Impacts of physicochemical properties of substrate on interfacial polymerization formation

Desalination

Volumn 344, Issue , 2014, Pages 198-205

  Misdan, N ^a   Lau, W J ^a   Ismail, A F ^a   Matsuura, T ^a,b   Rana, D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Interfacial polymerization; Morphology; Nanofiltration; Polyamide; Separation; Substrate

Indexed keywords

AMIDES; MICROFILTRATION; MORPHOLOGY; NANOFILTRATION; NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES; POLYAMIDES; POLYMERIZATION; SEPARATION; WATER FILTRATION;

DIFFERENT SUBSTRATES; FILTRATION EXPERIMENTS; INTERFACIAL POLYMERIZATION; PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTY; POLYMER MATERIALS; SEPARATION PERFORMANCE; SUBSTRATE MEMBRANES; THIN FILM COMPOSITES;

SUBSTRATES;

COMPOSITE; FILTRATION; INTERFACE; MEMBRANE; PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTY; POLYMER; POLYMERIZATION; SEPARATION; SUBSTRATE;

EID: 84898893954     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2014.03.036     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Petersen R.J. Composite reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1993, 83:81-150.
2. Jegal J., Min S.G., Lee K.-H. Factors affecting the interfacial polymerization of polyamide active layers for the formation of polyamide composite membranes. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2002, 86:2781-2787.
3. Misdan N., Lau W.J., Ismail A.F. Seawater reverse osmosis (SWRO) desalination by thin-film composite membrane-current development, challenges and future prospects. Desalination 2012, 287:228-237.
4. Ahmad A.L., Ooi B.S. Properties-performance of thin film composites membrane: study on trimesoyl chloride content and polymerization time. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 255:67-77.
5. Tang C.Y., Kwon Y.N., Leckie J.O. Effect of membrane chemistry and coating layer on physiochemical properties of thin film composite polyamide RO and NF membranes. I. FTIR and XPS characterization of polyamide and coating layer chemistry. Desalination 2009, 242:149-167.
6. Wei J., Jian X., Wu C., Zhang S., Yan C. Influence of polymer structure on thermal stability of composite membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 256:116-121.
7. Prakash Rao A., Joshi S.V., Trivedi J.J., Devmurari C.V., Shah V.J. Structure-performance correlation of polyamide thin film composite membranes: effect of coating conditions on film formation. J. Membr. Sci. 2003, 211:13-24.
8. Childress A.E., Elimelech M. Relating nanofiltration membrane performance to membrane charge (electrokinetic) characteristics. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 34:3710-3716.
9. Košutić K., Kaštelan-Kunst L., Kunst B. Porosity of some commercial reverse osmosis and nanofiltration polyamide thin-film composite membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 168:101-108.
10. Mi B., Coronell O., Mariñas B.J., Watanabe F., Cahill D.G., Petrov I. Physico-chemical characterization of NF/RO membrane active layers by Rutherford backscattering spectrometry. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 282:71-81.
11. Van der Bruggen B., Jansen J.C., Figoli A., Geens J., Van Baelen D., Drioli E., Vandecasteele C. Determination of parameters affecting transport in polymeric membranes: parallels between pervaporation and nanofiltration. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108:13273-13279.
12. Saha N.K., Joshi S.V. Performance evaluation of thin film composite polyamide nanofiltration membrane with variation in monomer type. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 342:60-69.
13. Ghosh A.K., Jeong B.-H., Huang X., Hoek E.M.V. Impacts of reaction and curing conditions on polyamide composite reverse osmosis membrane properties. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 311:34-45.
14. Ghosh A.K., Hoek E.M.V. Impacts of support membrane structure and chemistry on polyamide-polysulfone interfacial composite membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 336:140-148.
15. Singh P.S., Joshi S.V., Trivedi J.J., Devmurari C.V., Rao A.P., Ghosh P.K. Probing the structural variations of thin film composite RO membranes obtained by coating polyamide over polysulfone membranes of different pore dimensions. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 278:19-25.
16. Misdan N., Lau W.J., Ismail A.F., Matsuura T. Formation of thin film composite nanofiltration membrane: effect of polysulfone substrate characteristics. Desalination 2013, 329:9-18.
17. Oh N.-W., Jegal J., Lee K.-H. Preparation and characterization of nanofiltration composite membranes using polyacrylonitrile (PAN). I. preparation and modification of PAN supports. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2001, 80:1854-1862.
18. Oh N.-W., Jegal J., Lee K.-H. Preparation and characterization of nanofiltration composite membranes using polyacrylonitrile (PAN). II. Preparation and characterization of polyamide composite membranes. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2001, 80:2729-2736.
19. Khayet M., Feng C.Y., Khulbe K.C., Matsuura T. Preparation and characterization of polyvinylidene fluoride hollow fiber membranes for ultrafiltration. Polymer 2002, 43:3879-3890.
20. García-Payo M.C., Essalhi M., Khayet M. Effects of PVDF-HFP concentration on membrane distillation performance and structural morphology of hollow fiber membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 347:209-219.
21. Singh S., Khulbe K.C., Matsuura T., Ramamurthy P. Membrane characterization by solute transport and atomic force microscopy. J. Membr. Sci. 1998, 142:111-127.
22. Masselin I., Durand-Bourlier L., Laine J.-M., Sizaret P.-Y., Chasseray X., Lemordant D. Membrane characterization using microscopic image analysis. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 186:85-96.
23. Zhao S., Wang Z., Wei X., Zhao B., Wang J., Yang S., Wang S. Performance improvement of polysulfone ultrafiltration membrane using PANiEB as both pore forming agent and hydrophilic modifier. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 385-386:251-262.
24. Guillen G.R., Farrell T.P., Kaner R.B., Hoek E.M.V. Pore-structure, hydrophilicity, and particle filtration characteristics of polyaniline-polysulfone ultrafiltration membranes. J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20:4621-4628.
25. Fontyn M., van 't Riet K., Bijsterbosch B.H. Surface spectroscopic studies of pristine and fouled membranes part 1. Method development and pristine membrane characterization. Colloids Surf. 1991, 54:331-347.
26. Belfer S., Fainchtain R., Purinson Y., Kedem O. Surface characterization by FTIR-ATR spectroscopy of polyethersulfone membranes-unmodified, modified and protein fouled. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 172:113-124.
27. Fritzsche A.K., Arevalo A.R., Connolly A.F., Moore M.D., Elings V., Wu C.M. The structure and morphology of the skin of polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes: a comparative atomic force microscope and scanning electron microscope study. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1992, 45:1945-1956.
28. Mansourpanah Y., Madaeni S.S., Rahimpour A. Fabrication and development of interfacial polymerized thin-film composite nanofiltration membrane using different surfactants in organic phase; study of morphology and performance. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 343:219-228.
29. Tang C.Y., Kwon Y.-N., Leckie J.O. Probing the nano- and micro-scales of reverse osmosis membranes-a comprehensive characterization of physiochemical properties of uncoated and coated membranes by XPS, TEM, ATR-FTIR, and streaming potential measurements. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 287:146-156.
30. Freger V. Kinetics of film formation by interfacial polycondensation. Langmuir 2005, 21:1884-1894.
31. Ji J., Dickson J.M., Childs R.F., Mccarry B.E. Mathematical model for the formation of thin-film composite membranes by interfacial polymerization: porous and dense films. Macromolecules 1999, 33:624-633.
32. Yuan F., Wang Z., Yu X., Wei Z., Li S., Wang J., Wang S. Visualization of the formation of interfacially polymerized film by an optical contact angle measuring device. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116:11496-11506.
33. Morgan P.W. Condensation Polymers: By Interfacial and Solution Methods 1965, 19-64. Interscience Publishers, New York.