The in vivo evaluation of tissue-based biomaterials in a rat full-thickness abdominal wall defect model

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials

Volumn 102, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 709-720

  Bryan, Nicholas ^a   Ahswin, Helen ^b   Smart, Neil ^c   Bayon, Yves ^b   Wohlert, Stephen ^b   Hunt, John A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b MEDTRONIC INC   (United States)

^c ROYAL DEVON AND EXETER HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

animal model; biocompatibility; biologic prosthesis; hernia; in vivo

Indexed keywords

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; DEFECTS; RATS; SODIUM DODECYL SULFATE;

ABDOMINAL WALL DEFECTS; ANIMAL MODEL; FOREIGN BODY RESPONSE; HERNIA; IN-VIVO; INFLAMMATORY PROPERTIES; INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS;

REPAIR;

BIOMATERIAL; 1,6-HEXAMETHYLENE DIISOCYANATE; CROSS LINKING REAGENT; ISOCYANIC ACID DERIVATIVE;

ABDOMINAL WALL; ABDOMINAL WALL DEFECT; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS LINKING; FOREIGN BODY; HERNIOPLASTY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; IN VIVO STUDY; MALE; NONHUMAN; POLYPROPYLENE SUTURE; RAT; SKELETAL MUSCLE; SMALL INTESTINE MUCOSA; SURGICAL MESH; TISSUE REGENERATION; TISSUE REPAIR; WOUND HEALING; ANIMAL; ARTIFICIAL SKIN; BIODEGRADABLE IMPLANT; BIOPROSTHESIS; CELL MOTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DERMIS; EVALUATION STUDY; FOREIGN-BODY REACTION; HERNIA, ABDOMINAL; HERNIORRHAPHY; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; PATHOLOGY; PERITONEUM; PROCEDURES; SURGERY; SURGICAL WOUND DEHISCENCE; SWINE; WISTAR RAT;

ABSORBABLE IMPLANTS; ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BIOPROSTHESIS; CELL MOVEMENT; CROSS-LINKING REAGENTS; DERMIS; FOREIGN-BODY REACTION; HERNIA, ABDOMINAL; HERNIORRHAPHY; HUMANS; ISOCYANATES; MATERIALS TESTING; MODELS, ANIMAL; PERITONEUM; RATS; RATS, WISTAR; SKIN, ARTIFICIAL; SURGICAL MESH; SURGICAL WOUND DEHISCENCE; SWINE; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 84898873214     PISSN: 15524973     EISSN: 15524981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.33050     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Witko-Sarasat V, Rieu P, Descamps-Latscha B, Lesavre P, Halbwachs-Mecarelli L,. Neutrophils: Molecules, functions and pathophysiological aspects. Lab Invest 2000; 80: 617-653.
2. Kumar V, Sharma A,. Neutrophil: Cinderella of the immune system. Int Immunophamacol 2010; 10: 1325-1334.
3. Pham CT,. Neutrophil serine protease fine tune the immune system. Int J Cell Biol Biochem 2008; 40: 1317-1333.
4. Kikly K, Lotze MT,. The skin and normal wound healing process. In:, Lotze MT, Thomson AW, editor. Dendritic Cells, 2nd ed. London: Elsevier. 2001. pp 539-545.
5. Haney AF,. Identification of macrophages at the site of peritoneal injury: Evidence supporting a direct role for peritoneal macrophages in healing injured peritoneum. Fertil Steril 2000; 73: 988-995. (Pubitemid 30227524)
6. Midwood KS, Williams LV, Schwarzbauer JE,. Tissue repair and the dynamics of the extracellular matrix. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2004; 36: 1031-1037. (Pubitemid 38501555)
7. Cassell OCS, Hofer SOP, Morrison WA, Knight KR,. Vascularisation of tissue-engineered grafts: The regulation of angiogenesis in reconstructive surgery and disease states. Brit J Plast Surg 2002; 55: 603-610. (Pubitemid 35469780)
8. Butterfield TA, Best TM, Merrick MA,. The dual roles of neutrophils and macrophages in inflammation: A critical balance between tissue damage and repair. J Athl Train 2006; 4: 457-465. (Pubitemid 46889989)
9. Rubartelli A, Lotze MT,. Inside, outside, upside down: Damage-associated molecular-pattern molecules (DAMPs) and redox. Trends Immunol 2007; 28: 429-436. (Pubitemid 47444554)
10. Williams D,. To engineer is to create: The link between engineering and regeneration. Trends Biotechnol 2006; 24: 4-8. (Pubitemid 43017744)
11. van't Riet M, de Vos van Steenwijk PJ, Bonjer HJ, Steyerberg EW, Jeekel J,. Mesh repair for postoperative wound dehiscence in the presence of infection: Is absorbable mesh safer than non-absorbable mesh. Hernia 2007; 11: 409-413.
12. Hiles M, Ritchie RDR, Altizer AM,. Are biologic grafts effective for hernia repair? A systematic review of the literature. Surg Innov 2009; 16: 26-37.
13. Smart NJ, Marshall M, Daniels IR,. Biological meshes: A review of their use in abdominal wall hernia repairs. Surgeon 2012; 10: 159-171.
14. Bilsel Y, Abci I,. The search for ideal hernia repair; mesh, materials and types. Int J Surg 2012; 10: 317-321.
15. Bryan N, Rhodes NP, Hunt JA,. Derivation and performance of an entirely autologous injectable hydrogel delivery system for cell-based therapies. Biomaterials 2009; 30: 180-188.
16. Takami Y, Matsuda T, Yoshitake M, Hanumadass M, Walter RJ,. Dispase/detergent treated dermal matrix as a dermal substitute. Burns 1996; 22: 182-190. (Pubitemid 26119844)
17. Keane TJ, Londono R, Turner NJ, Badylak SF,. Consequences of ineffective decellularisation of biologic scaffolds on the host response. Biomaterials 2012; 33: 1771-1781.
18. Gilbert TW, Sellaro TL, Badylak SF,. Decellularisation of tissues and organs. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 3675-3683.
19. Xu H, Wan H, Sandor M, Qi S, Ervin F, Harper JR, Silverman RP, McQuillan DJ,. Host response to human acellular dermal matrix transplantation in a primate model of abdominal wall repair. Tissue Eng Part A 2008; 14: 2009-2019.
20. Badylak S, Kokini K, Tullis B, Simmons-Byrd A, Morff R,. Morphologic study of small intestine submucosa as a body wall repair device. J Surg Res 2002; 103: 190-202. (Pubitemid 34948501)
21. Gilbert TW, Stewart-Akers AM, Simmons-Byrd A, Badylak S,. Degradation and remodelling of small intestinal submucosa in canine Achilles tendon repair. J Bone Joint Surg 2007; 89: 621-630. (Pubitemid 46365363)
22. Guo S, DiPietro LA,. Factors affecting wound healing. J Dent Res 2010; 89: 219-229.
23. Liang HC, Chang Y, Hsu CK, Lee MH, Sung HW,. Effects of cross-linking degree of an acellular biological tissue on its tissue regeneration pattern. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 3541-3552. (Pubitemid 38327043)
24. Deeken CR, Melman L, Jenkins ED, Greco SC, Frisella MM, Matthews BD,. Histologic and biomechanical evaluation of cross-linked and non cross-linked biologic meshes in a porcine model of ventral incisional hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg 2007; 212: 880-888.
25. Zhang J, Wang GY, Xiao YP, Fan LY, Wang Q,. The biomechanical behaviour and host response to porcine-derived small intestine submucosa, pericardium and dermal matrix acellular grafts in a rat abdominal defect model. Biomaterials 2011; 32: 7086-7095.
26. Petter-Puchner AH, Fortelny RH, Walder N, Mittermayr R, Ohlinger W, van Griensven M, Redl H,. Adverse effects associated with the use of porcine cross-linked collagen implants in an experimental model of porcine incisional hernia. J Surg Res 2008; 145: 105-110. (Pubitemid 351221095)
27. Butler CE, Burns NK, Campbell KT, Mathur AB, Jaffari MV, Rios CN,. Comparison of cross-linked and non-cross-linked porcine acellualr dermal matrices for ventral hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg 2010; 211: 368-376.
28. Bryan N, Ashwin H, Smart N, Bayon Y, Scarborough N, Hunt JA,. The innate oxygen dependent immune pathway is a sensitive parameter to predict the performance of biological graft materials. Biomaterials 2012; 33: 6380-6392.
29. Valentin JE, Turner NJ, Gilbert TW, Badylak SF,. Functional skeletal muscle formation with a biologic scaffold. Biomaterials 2010; 31: 7475-4784.
30. Brown BN, Londono R, Tottey S, Zhang L, Kukla KA, Wolf MT, Daly KA, Reing JE, Badylak SF,. Macrophage phenotype as a predictor of constructive remodelling following the implantation of biologically derived surgical mesh materials. Acta Biomater 2012; 8: 978-987.
31. Beres A, Christison-Lagay ER, Romao RLP, Langer JC,. Evaluation of Surgisis for patch repair of abdominal wall defects in children. J Paed Surg 2012; 47: 917-919.
32. Orenstein S, Qiao Y, Kaur M, Klueh U, Kreutzer D, Novitsky Y,. In vitro activation of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells induced by human biologic meshes. J Surg Res 2010; 158: 10-14.
33. Petter-Puchner AH, Dietz UA,. Biological implants in abdominal wall repair. BJS 2013; 100: 987-988.