Face, content, construct and concurrent validity of dry laboratory exercises for robotic training using a global assessment tool

BJU International

Volumn 113, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 836-842

  Ramos, Patrick ^a   Montez, Jeremy ^a   Tripp, Adrian ^a   Ng, Casey K ^a   Gill, Inderbir S ^a   Hung, Andrew J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

dry lab models; educational models; robotics training; validation studies

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONCURRENT VALIDITY; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONTENT VALIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; FACE VALIDITY; FEMALE; GLOBAL EVALUATIVE ASSESSMENT OF ROBOTIC SKILL; HUMAN; MALE; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROBOTICS; SIMULATOR; SURGICAL TRAINING; VIRTUAL REALITY;

DRY LAB MODELS; EDUCATIONAL MODELS; ROBOTICS TRAINING; VALIDATION STUDIES;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; HUMANS; MODELS, EDUCATIONAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROBOTICS; UNITED STATES; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; UROLOGY;

EID: 84898871660     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bju.12559     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Scalese RJ, Obeso VT, Issenberg SB,. Simulation technology for skills training and competency assessment in medical education. J Gen Intern Med 2008; 23 (Suppl. 1): 46-49 (Pubitemid 350295393)
2. Scott DJ, Dunnington GL,. The new ACS/APDS Skills Curriculum: moving the learning curve out of the operating room. J Gastrointest Surg 2008; 12: 213-221
3. Hung AJ, Zehnder P, Patil MB, et al. Face, content and construct validity of a novel robotic surgery simulator. J Urol 2011; 186: 1019-1024
4. Seixas-Mikelus SA, Kesavadas T, Srimathveeravalli G, Chandrasekhar R, Wilding GE, Guru KA,. Face validation of a novel robotic surgical simulator. Urology 2010; 76: 357-360
5. Seixas-Mikelus SA, Stegemann AP, Kesavadas T, et al. Content validation of a novel robotic surgical simulator. BJU Int 2011; 107: 1130-1135
6. Hung AJ, Jayaratna IS, Teruya K, Desai MM, Gill IS, Goh AC,. Comparative assessment of three standardized robotic surgery training methods. BJU Int 2013; 112: 864-871
7. Goh AC, Goldfarb DW, Sander JC, Miles BJ, Dunkin BJ,. Global evaluative assessment of robotic skills: validation of a clinical assessment tool to measure robotic surgical skills. J Urol 2012; 187: 247-252
8. McDougall EM,. Validation of surgical simulators. J Endourol 2007; 21: 244-247 (Pubitemid 46626528)
9. Hafford ML, Van Sickle KR, Willis RE, et al. Ensuring competency: are fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery training and certification necessary for practicing surgeons and operating room personnel? Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 118-126. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2437-7. Epub 2012 Jul 7
10. Hung AJ, Patil MB, Zehnder P, et al. Concurrent and predictive validation of a novel robotic surgery simulator: a prospective, randomized study. J Urol 2012; 187: 630-637
11. Patel VR, Tully AS, Holmes R, Lindsay J,. Robotic radical prostatectomy in the community setting-the learning curve and beyond: initial 200 cases. J Urol 2005; 174: 269-272 (Pubitemid 40825733)
12. Hung AJ, Ng CK, Patil MB, et al. Validation of a novel robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy surgical training model. BJU Int 2012; 110: 870-874