Should African rural development strategies depend on smallholder farms? An exploration of the inverse-productivity hypothesis

Agricultural Economics (United Kingdom)

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 355-367

  Larson, Donald F ^a   Otsuka, Keijiro ^b   Matsumoto, Tomoya ^b   Kilic, Talip ^a  

^a WORLD BANK   (United States)

^b NATIONAL GRADUATE INSTITUTE FOR POLICY STUDIES   (Japan)

Author keywords

Agriculture; Farm size; Inverse productivity; Smallholders; Sub Saharan Africa; Technology choice

Indexed keywords

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84898855766     PISSN: 01695150     EISSN: 15740862     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/agec.12070     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. AGRA, 2011. What is the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa? Available at: www.agra-alliance.org. Accessed June 16, 2011.
2. Antle, J.M., 1983. Sequential decision making in production models. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 65(2), 282-290.
3. Assuncao, J., Braido, L.H., 2007. Testing household-specific explanations for the inverse productivity relationship. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 89(4), 980-990.
4. Bardhan, P.K., 1973. Size, productivity, and returns to scale: An analysis of farm-level data in Indian agriculture. J. Polit. Econ. 81(6), 1370-1386.
5. Barrett, C.B., 1996. On price risk and the inverse farm size-productivity relationship. J. Dev. Econ. 51(2), 193-215.
6. Barrett, C.B., Bellemare, M.F., Hou, J.Y., 2010. Reconsidering conventional explanations of the inverse productivity-size relationship. World Dev. 38(1), 88-97.
7. Bauer, P.T., 1946. The working of rubber regulation. Econ. J. 56(223), 391-414.
8. Beegle, K., De Weerdt, J., Friedman, J., Gibson, J., 2012. Methods of household consumption measurement through surveys: Experimental results from Tanzania. J. Dev. Econ. 98(1), 3-18.
9. Benjamin, D., 1995. Can unobserved land quality explain the inverse productivity relationship. J. Dev. Econ. 46(1), 51-84.
10. Berry, R.A., Cline, W.R., 1979. Agrarian Structure and Productivity in Developing Countries. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
11. Bhalla, S., 1979. Farm size, productivity and technical change in Indian agriculture, appendix. In: Berry, R.A., Cline, W.R. (Eds.), Agrarian Structure and Productivity in Developing Countries. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
12. Bhalla, S.S., Roy, P., 1988. Mis-specification in farm productivity analysis: The role of land quality. Oxford Econ. Papers 40(1), 55-73.
13. Binswanger, H., 1991. Brazilian policies that encourage deforestation in the Amazon. World Dev. 19(7), 821-829.
14. Binswanger, H., McIntire, J., 1987. Behavioral and material determinants of production relations in land abundant tropical agriculture. Econ. Dev. Cult. Change 36(1), 75-99.
15. Binswanger, H., Rosenzweig, M.R., 1986. Behavioral and material determinants of production relations in agriculture. J. Dev. Stud. 22(3), 503-539.
16. Carletto, C., Savastano, S., Zezza, A., 2011. Fact or Artefact: The Impact of Measurement Errors on the Far Size-Productivity Relationship. Policy Research Working Paper 5908, World Bank, Washington.
17. Carter, M.R., 1984. Identification of the inverse relationship between farm size and productivity: An empirical analysis of peasant agricultural production. Oxford Econ. Papers 36(1), 131-145.
18. Carter, M.R., Wiebe, K.D., 1990. Access to capital and its impact on agrarian structure and productivity in Kenya. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 72(5), 1146-1150.
19. Collier, P., 2008. The politics of hunger. Foreign Aff. 87(6), 67-79.
20. Deininger, K., Byerlee, D., 2012. The rise of large farms in land abundant countries: Do they have a future. World Dev. 40(4), 701-714.
21. Deininger, K., Feder, G., 2001. Land institutions and land markets. In: Gardner, B.L., Rausser, G.C. (Eds.), Handbook of Agricultural Economics, Volume 1, Part A. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
22. Deolalikar, A.B., 1981. The inverse relationship between productivity and farm size: A test using regional data from India. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 63(2), 275-279.
23. Diouf, J., 2011. Foreword to Save and Grow: A Policymaker's Guide to the Sustainable Intensification of Smallholder Crop Production. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
24. Eicher, C.K., Baker, D.C., 1982. Research on Agricultural Development in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Critical Survey. MSU International Development Paper 1. Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.
25. Fan, S., 2011. Press Statement June 15, 2011. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington.
26. FAO, 2012. FAOSTAT data base. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.
27. Feder, G., 1985. The relation between farm size and farm productivity: The role of family labor, supervision and credit constraints. J. Dev. Econ. 18(2-3), 297-313.
28. Foster, A.D., Rosenzweig, M.R., 2011. Are Indian farms too small? Mechanization, agency costs, and farm efficincy. Brown University, Providence, RI.
29. Gates, B., 2012. Helping Poor Farmers, Changes Needed to Feed 1 Billion Hungry. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Available at: http://www.gatesfoundation.org/media-center/press-releases/2012/02/helping-poor-farmers-changes-needed-to-feed-1-billion-hungry. Accessed August 20, 2013.
30. Hausman, J.A., 1978. Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica 46(6), 1251-1271.
31. Hazell, P., Poulton, C., Wiggins, S., Dorward, A., 2010. The future of small farms: Trajectories and policy priorities. World Dev. 38(10), 1349-1361.
32. Heltberg, R., 1998. Rural market imperfections and the farm size-productivity relationship: Evidence from Pakistan. World Dev. 26(10), 1807-1182.
33. Kevane, M., 1996. Agrarian structure and agricultural practice: Typology and application to Western Sudan. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 78(1), 236-245.
34. Kimhi, A., 2006. Plot size and maize productivity in Zambia: Is there an inverse relationship? Agric. Econ. 35(1), 1-9.
35. Lamb, R.L., 2003. Inverse productivity: Land quality, labor markets, and measurement error. J. Dev. Econ. 71(1), 71-95.
36. Lane, C., Pretty, J.N., 1991. Displaced Pastoralists and Transferred Wheat Technology in Tanzania. IIED Gatekeeper Series No. 20. International Institute for Environment and Development, London.
37. Larson, D.F., León, M., 2006. How endowments, accumulations, and choice determine the geography of agricultural productivity in Ecuador. World Bank Econ. Rev. 20(3), 449-471.
38. Larson, D.F., Mundlak, Y., 1997. On the intersectoral migration of agricultural labor. Econ. Dev. Cult. Change 45(2), 295-319.
39. Lipton, M., 2006. Can small farmers survive, prosper, or be the key channel to cut mass poverty? Electron. J. Agric. Dev. Econ. 3(1), 58-85.
40. Matsumoto, T., Yamano, T., 2013. Maize, soil fertility, and the Green Revolution in East Africa. In: Otsuka, K., Larson, D.F. (Eds.), An African Green Revolution: Finding Ways to Boost Productivity on Small Farms. Springer, Dordrecht.
41. Mazumdar, D., 1965. Size of farm and productivity: A problem of Indian peasant agriculture. Economica 32(126), 161-173.
42. Mundlak, Y., 1988. Endogenous technology and the measurement of productivity. In: Capalbo, S.M., Antle, J.M. (Eds.), Agricultural Productivity: Measurement and Explanation. Resources for the Future, Washington.
43. Mundlak, Y., 1993. On the empirical aspects of economic growth theory. Am. Econ. Rev. 83(2), 415-420.
44. Mundlak, Y., Butzer, R., Larson, D.F., 2012. Heterogeneous technology and panel data: The case of the agricultural production function. J. Dev. Econ. 99(1), 139-149.
45. Mundlak, Y., Larson, D.F., Butzer, R., 1999. Rethinking within and between regressions: The case of agricultural production functions. Annales d'Économie et de Statistique (55/56), Économétrie des Données de Panel, 475-501.
46. Nagayets, O., 2005. Small farms: Current status and key trends. In The Future of Small Farms. Proceedings of a Research Workshop. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington.
47. Otsuka, K., Larson, D.F., 2012. An African Green Revolution: Finding Ways to Boost Productivity on Small Farms. Springer, Dordrecht.
48. Pingali, P., Bigot, Y., Binswanger, H.P., 1987. Agricultural Mechanization and the Evolution of Farming Systems in Sub-Saharan Africa. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
49. Ravallion, M., Chen, S., Sangraula, P., 2007. New evidence on the urbanization of global poverty. Popul. Dev. Rev. 33(4), 667-701.
50. Sen, A.K., 1966. Peasants and dualism with or without surplus labor. J. Polit. Econ. 74(5), 425-450.
51. Smale, M., Byerlee, D., Jayne, T., 2012. Maize revolutions in Africa. In: Otsuka, K., Larson, D.F. (Eds.), An African Green Revolution: Finding Ways to Boost Productivity on Small Farms. Springer, Dordrecht.
52. Taslim, M.A., 1989. Supervision problems and the size-productivity relation in Bangladesh agriculture. Oxford Bull. Econ. Stat. 51(1), 55-71.
53. von Braun, J., 2005. Science and technology policies for agricultural productivity and growth in developing countries (PowerPoint Presentation), Agricultural Outlook Forum 2005 32857, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Outlook Forum. Available at: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/32857/1/fo05vo01.pdf. Accessed August 20, 2013.
54. World Bank, 2008. World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development. World Bank, Washington.
55. Yamano, T., Otsuka, K., Place, F., Kijima, Y., Nyoro, J., 2005. The 2004 REPEAT Survey in Kenya (First Wave): Results. Available at: http://www3.grips.ac.jp/~globalcoe/j/data/repeat/ReportKenya2004F.pdf. Accessed August 20, 2013.
56. Yamano, T., Sserunkuuma, D., Otsuka, K., Omiat, G., Ainembabazi, J.H., Shimamura, Y., 2004. The 2003 REPEAT Survey in Uganda: Results. Available at: http://www3.grips.ac.jp/~yamanota/REPEATinUgandaReport.pdf. Accessed August 20, 2013.
57. Yotopoulos, P.A., Lau, L.J., 1973. A test for relative economic efficiency: Some further results. Am. Econ. Rev. 63(1), 214-223.
58. Zoellick, R., 2011. Free markets can still feed the world. Financial Times, January 5, 2011.