Nonverbal communication theories of interaction adaptation

The Handbook of Communication Science

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 93-108

  Burgoon, Judee K ^a   Floyd, Kory ^b   Guerrero, Laura K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898843383     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781412982818.n6     Document Type: Chapter

References (56)

1. Andersen, P. A. (1985). Nonverbal immediacy in interpersonal communication. In A. W. Siegman & S. Feldstein (Eds.), Mulitchannel integrations of nonverbal behavior (pp. 1-36). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2. Andersen, P. A. (1992, July). Excessive intimacy: An account analysis of behaviors, cognitive schemata, affect, and relational outcomes. Paper presented at the International Conference on Personal Relationships, Orono, ME.
3. Andersen, P. A. (1998). The cognitive valence theory of intimate communication. In M. Palmer & G. A. Barnett (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences: Vol. 14. Mutual influence in interpersonal communication theory and research in cognition, affect, and behavior (pp. 39-72). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
4. Andersen, P. A. Guerrero, L. K. Buller, D. B. Jorgensen, P. F. An empirical comparison of three theories of nonverbal immediacy exchange. Human Communication Research 24 501-535. (1998). doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1998.tb00429.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1998.tb00429.x
5. Argyle, M. Dean, J. Eye-contact, distance and affiliation. Sociometry 28 289-304. (1965). doi:10.2307/2786027 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2786027
6. Baker, M. A. Reciprocal accommodation: A model for reducing gender bias in managerial communication. Journal of Business Communication 28 113-130. (1991). doi:10.1177/002194369102800203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002194369102800203
7. Bavelas, J. B. Black, A. Chovil, N. Lemery, C. R. Mullett, J. Form and function in motor mimicry: Topographic evidence that the primary function is communicative. Human Communication Research 14 275-300. (1988). doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1988.tb00158.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1988.tb00158.x
8. Boggs, C. Giles, H.“The canary in the cage”: The nonaccommodation cycle in the gendered workplace. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 22 223-245. (1999).
9. Bourhis, R. Y. (1991). Organization communication and accommodation: Toward some conceptual and empirical links. In H. Giles, J. Coupland, & N. Coupland (Eds.), Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics (pp. 270-304). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511663673.009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511663673.009
10. Bourhis, R. Y., & Giles, H. (1977). The language of intergroup distinctiveness. In H. Giles (Ed.), Language, ethnicity and intergroup relations (pp. 119-135). London: Academic Press.
11. Buller, D. B. Aune, R. K. The effects of vocalics and nonverbal sensitivity on compliance: A speech accommodation theory explanation. Human Communication Research 14 301-332. (1988). doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1988.tb00159.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1988.tb00159.x
12. Buller, D. B. Aune, R. K. The effects of speech rate similarity on compliance: Application of communication accommodation theory. Western Journal of Communication 56 37-53. (1992). doi:10.1080/10570319209374400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10570319209374400
13. Burgoon, J. K.A communication model of personal space violations: Explication and an initial test. Human Communication Research 4 129-142. (1978). doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1978.tb00603.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1978.tb00603.x
14. Burgoon, J. K., Allspach, L. E., & Miczo, N. (1997, February). Needs, expectancies, goals and initial interaction: A view from interaction adaptation theory. Paper presented to the Western States Communication Association, Monterey, CA.
15. Burgoon, J. K., & Bacue, A. (2003). Nonverbal communication skills. In B. R. Burleson & J. O. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of communication and social interaction skills (pp. 179-219). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16. Burgoon, J. K. Dillman, L. Stern, L. A. Adaptation in dyadic interaction: Defining and operationalizing patterns of reciprocity and compensation. Commu-nication Theory 4 293-316. (1993).
17. Burgoon, J. K., Ebesu, A., White, C., Koch, P., Alvaro, E., & Kikuchi, T. (1998). The many faces of interaction adaptation. In M. T. Palmer & G. A. Barnett (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences (Vol. 14, pp. 191-220). Stamford, CT: Ablex.
18. Burgoon, J. K. Hale, J. L. Nonverbal expectancy violations: Model elaboration and application to immediacy behaviors. Communication Monographs 55 58-79. (1988). doi:10.1080/03637758809376158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637758809376158
19. Burgoon, J. K., & Hoobler, G. (2002). Nonverbal signals. In M. L. Knapp & J. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 240-299). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Burgoon, J. K. Le Poire, B. A. Rosenthal, R. Effects of preinteraction expectancies and target communication on perceiver reciprocity and compensation in dyadic interaction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 31 287-321. (1995). doi:10.1006/jesp.1995.1014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1995.1014
21. Burgoon, J. K. Olney, C. A. Coker, R. A. The effects of communicator characteristics on patterns of reciprocity and compensation. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 11 146-165. (1987). doi:10.1007/BF00990234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00990234
22. Burgoon, J. K., Stern, L. A., & Dillman, L. (1995). Interpersonal adaptation: Dyadic interaction patterns. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511720314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511720314
23. Cappella, J. N. Greene, J. O.A discrepancy-arousal explanation of mutual influence in expressive behavior for adult and infant-adult interaction. Communication Monographs 49 89-114. (1982). doi:10.1080/03637758209376074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637758209376074
24. Cappella, J. N. Greene, J. O. The effects of distance and individual differences in arousability on nonverbal involvement: A test of discrepancy-arousal theory. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 8 259-286. (1984). doi:10.1007/BF00985983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00985983
25. Coker, D. A. Burgoon, J. K. The nature of conversational involvement and nonverbal encoding patterns. Human Communication Research 13 463-494. (1987). doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1987.tb00115.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1987.tb00115.x
26. Floyd, K. Burgoon, J. K. Reacting to nonverbal expressions of liking: A test of interaction adaptation theory. Communi-cation Monographs 66 219-239. (1999). doi:10.1080/03637759909376475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637759909376475
27. Floyd, K., Ramirez, A., & Burgoon, J. K. (2008). Expectancy violations theory. In L. K. Guerrero & M. L. Hecht (Eds.), The nonverbal communication reader (3rd ed., pp. 503-510). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
28. Gallois, C., Giles, H., Jones, E., Cargile, A. C., & Ota, H. (1995). Accommodating inter-cultural encounters: Elaborations and extensions. In R. Wiseman (Ed.), Intercultural communication theory (pp. 115-147). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29. Giles, H. Accent mobility: A model and some data. Anthropological Linguistics 15 87-109. (1973).
30. Giles, H. Fox, S. Smith, E. Patronizing the elderly: Intergenerational evaluations. Research in Language and Social Interaction 26 129-149. (1993). doi:10.1207/s15327973rlsi2602_1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2602_1
31. Giles, H., Mulac, A., Bradac, J. J., & Johnson, P. (1987). Speech communication theory: The next decade and beyond. In M. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication yearbook 10 (pp. 13-48). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
32. Giles, H., & Wadleigh, P. M. (2008). Accommo-dating nonverbally. In L. K. Guerrero, J. A. De Vito, & M. L. Hecht (Eds.), The nonverbal communication reader (3rd ed., pp. 491-502). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
33. Giles, H., Willemyns, M., Gallois, C., & Anderson, M. C. (2007). Accommodating a new frontier: The context of law enforcement. In K. Fiedler (Ed.), Social communication (pp. 129-162). New York: Psychology Press.
34. Gouldner, A. W. The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Socio-logical Review 25 161-178. (1960). doi:10.2307/2092623 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2092623
35. Gregory, S. W. Dagan, K. Webster, S. Evaluating the relation of vocal accommodation in conversation partners’ fundamental frequencies to perceptions of communication quality. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 21 23-43. (1997). doi:10.1023/A:1024995717773 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1024995717773
36. Guerrero, L. K., Alberts, J. K., & Heisterkamp, B. (2001). Discrepancy arousal theory and cognitive valence theory. In W. P. Robinson & H. Giles (Eds.), The new handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 57-77). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
37. Guerrero, L. K. Burgoon, J. K. Attachment styles and reactions to non-verbal involvement change in romantic dyads: Patterns of reciprocity and compensation. Human Communication Research 22 335-370. (1996). doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1996.tb00371.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1996.tb00371.x
38. Guerrero, L. K., & Johnson, S. L. (2009). A test of cognitive valence theory. Manuscript in preparation.
39. Guerrero, L. K. Jones, S. M. Burgoon, J. K. Responses to nonverbal intimacy change in romantic dyads: Effects of behavioral valence and degree of behavioral change on nonverbal and verbal reactions. Communication Monographs 67 325-346. (2000). doi:10.1080/03637750009376515 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637750009376515
40. Hale, J. L. Burgoon, J. K. Models of reactions to changes in nonverbal immediacy. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 8 287-314. (1984). doi:10.1007/BF00985984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00985984
41. Kelso, J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge: MIT Press.
42. Kelso, J. A. S., & Engstrom, D. (2006). The complementary nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT/Bradford Press.
43. Le Poire, B. A. Burgoon, J. K. Two contrasting explanations of involvement violations: Expectancy violations theory versus discrepancy arousal theory. Human Communication Research 20 560-591. (1994). doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1994.tb00335.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1994.tb00335.x
44. Manusov, V., & Patterson, M. L. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of nonverbal communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sagedoi:10.4135/9781412976152 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412976152.
45. Miczo, N., Miczo, L. E., & Burgoon, J. K. (2008). Converging on the phenomenon of interpersonal adaptation: Interaction adaptation theory. In L. K. Guerrero & M. L. Hecht (Eds.), The nonverbal communication reader (3rd ed., pp. 521-530). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
46. Mulac, A. Studley, L. B. Wiemann, J. W. Bradac, J. J. Male-female gaze in same-sex and mixed-sex dyads: Gender-linked differences and mutual influence. Human Communication Research 13 323-344. (1987). doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1987.tb00108.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1987.tb00108.x
47. Patterson, M. L. Compensation in non-verbal immediacy behaviors: A review. Sociometry 36 237-252. (1973). doi:10.2307/2786569 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2786569
48. Patterson, M. L. (1983). Nonverbal behavior: A functional perspective. New York: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-5564-2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5564-2
49. Prager, K. J., & Roberts, L. J. (2004). Deep intimate connection: Self and intimacy in couple relationships. In D. J. Mashek & A. P. Aron (Eds.), Handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 43-60). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
50. Shepard, C. A., Giles, H., & Le Poire, B. A. (2001). Communication accommodation theory. In W. P. Robinson & H. Giles (Eds.), The new handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 33-56). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
51. Stern, D. N. (1974). Mother and infant at play: The dyadic interaction involving facial, vocal, and gaze behavior. In M. Lewis & L. A. Rosenblum (Eds.), The effect of the infant on its caregiver (pp. 187-213). New York: John Wiley.
52. Street, R. L., Jr.Speech convergence and speech evaluation in fact-finding interviews. Human Communication Research 11 139-169. (1984). doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1984.tb00043.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1984.tb00043.x
53. Thakerar, J., Giles, H., & Cheshire, J. (1982). Psychological and linguistic parameters of speech accommodation theory. In C. Fraser & K. R. Scherer (Eds.), Advances in the social psychology of language (pp. 205-255). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
54. Wertin, L., & Andersen, P. A. (1996, February). Cognitive schemata and perceptions of sexual harassment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western States Commu-nication Association, Pasadena, CA.
55. White, C. H. Burgoon, J. K. Adaptation and communicative design: Patterns of interaction in truthful and deceptive conversations. Human Commu-nication Research 27 9-37. (2001).
56. Willemyns, M. Gallois, C. Callan, V. J. Pittam, J. Accent accommodation in the job interview: Impact of interviewer accent and gender. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 16 3-22. (1997). doi:10.1177/0261927X970161001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0261927X970161001