Detecting curved symmetric parts using a deformable disc model

Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 1753-1760

  Lee, Tom Sie Ho ^a   Fidler, Sanja ^b   Dickinson, Sven ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b TOYOTA TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTE AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEFORMATION; PIXELS;

HYPOTHESIS SPACE; MEDIAL AXIS; PERCEPTUAL GROUPING; PRIORI KNOWLEDGE; SUPER PIXELS; SYMMETRY AXIS;

GEOMETRY;

EID: 84898829655     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICCV.2013.220     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. I. Biederman. Human image understanding: Recent research and a theory. CVGIP, 32:29-73, 1985.
2. T. O. Binford. Visual perception by computer. In ICSC, 1971.
3. H. Blum. A Transformation for Extracting New Descriptors of Shape. InW.Wathen-Dunn, editor, Models for the Perception of Speech and Visual Form, pages 362-380. MIT Press, Cambridge, 1967.
4. E. Borenstein and S. Ullman. Class-specific, top-down segmentation. In ECCV, pages 109-124, 2002.
5. M. Brady and H. Asada. Smoothed local symmetries and their implementation. IJRR, 3(3):36-61, 1984.
6. T.-J. Cham and R. Cipolla. Symmetry detection through local skewed symmetries. IVC, 13(5):439-450, 1995.
7. T.-J. Cham and R. Cipolla. Geometric saliency of curve correspondences and grouping of symmetric contours. In ECCV, pages 385-398, 1996.
8. J. H. Connell and M. Brady. Generating and generalizing models of visual objects. AI, 31(2):159-183, 1987.
9. J. Crowley and A. Parker. A representation for shape based on peaks and ridges in the difference of low-pass transform. PAMI, 6(2):156-169, 1984.
10. P. F. Felzenszwalb and D. P. Huttenlocher. Efficient graphbased image segmentation. IJCV, 59(2):167-181, 2004.
11. P. F. Felzenszwalb and D. McAllester. A min-cover approach for finding salient curves. In WPOCV, 2006.
12. S. Lee and Y. Liu. Curved glide-reflection symmetry detection. PAMI, 34(2):266-278, 2012.
13. A. Levinshtein, C. Sminchisescu, and S. Dickinson. Multiscale symmetric part detection and grouping. In ICCV, 2009.
14. T. Lindeberg and L. Bretzner. Real-time scale selection in hybrid multi-scale representations. In Scale-Space, volume 2695 of Springer LNCS, pages 148-163, 2003.
15. T. Liu, D. Geiger, and A. Yuille. Segmenting by seeking the symmetry axis. In ICPR, volume 2, pages 994-998, Aug 1998.
16. Y. Liu, H. Hel-Or, C. S. Kaplan, and L. V. Gool. Computational symmetry in computer vision and computer graphics: A survey. Foundations and Trends in Computer Graphics and Vision, 5(2):1-195, 2010.
17. D. G. Lowe. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. IJCV, 60(2):91-110, 2004.
18. G. Loy and J. Eklundh. Detecting symmetry and symmetric constellations of features. In ECCV, 2006.
19. D. Macrini, K. Siddiqi, and S. Dickinson. From skeletons to bone graphs: Medial abstraction for object recognition. CVPR, 2008.
20. D. Martin, C. Fowlkes, D. Tal, and J. Malik. A database of human segmented natural images and its application to evaluating segmentation algorithms and measuring ecological statistics. In ICCV, pages 416-423, 2001.
21. D. R. Martin, C. C. Fowlkes, and J. Malik. Learning to detect natural image boundaries using local brightness, color, and texture cues. PAMI, 26:530-549, 2004.
22. K. Mikolajczyk and C. Schmid. An affine invariant interest point detector. In ECCV, pages 128-142, 2002.
23. G. Mori, X. Ren, A. A. Efros, and J. Malik. Recovering human body configurations: Combining segmentation and recognition. In CVPR, pages 326-333, 2004.
24. M. Narayanan and B. Kimia. Bottom-up perceptual organization of images into object part hypotheses. In ECCV, 2012.
25. A. Pentland. Perceptual organization and the representation of natural form. AI, 28:293-331, 1986.
26. M. Pilu, A. W. Fitzgibbon, and R. Fisher. Training pdms on models: the case of deformable superellipses. PRL, 20(5):463-474, 1999.
27. J. Ponce. On characterizing ribbons and finding skewed symmetries. CVGIP, 52(3):328-340, 1990.
28. P. Saint-Marc, H. Rom, and G. Medioni. B-spline contour representation and symmetry detection. PAMI, 15(11):1191-1197, 1993.
29. T. Sebastian, P. Klein, and B. Kimia. Recognition of shapes by editing their shock graphs. PAMI, 26(5):550-571, 2004.
30. J. Shi and J. Malik. Normalized cuts and image segmentation. PAMI, 22(8):888-905, 2000.
31. A. Shokoufandeh, L. Bretzner, D. M. F. Demirci, C. J̈onsson, and S. Dickinson. The representation and matching of categorical shape. CVIU, 103(2):139-154, 2006.
32. A. Shokoufandeh, I. Marsic, and S. Dickinson. View-based object recognition using saliency maps. IVC, 17(5-6):445-460, 1999.
33. K. Siddiqi, A. Shokoufandeh, S. J. Dickinson, and S. W. Z. Y. Shock graphs and shape matching. IJCV, 35:13-32, 1999.
34. F. Solina and R. Bajcsy. Recovery of parametric models from range images: The case for superquadrics with global deformations. PAMI, 12(2):131-147, 1990.
35. J. Stahl and S. Wang. Globally optimal grouping for symmetric closed boundaries by combining boundary and region information. PAMI, 30(3):395-411, 2008.
36. S. Tsogkas and I. Kokkinos. Learning-based symmetry detection in natural images. In ECCV, 2012.
37. M. Wertheimer. Laws of organization in perceptual forms. InW. Ellis, editor, Source Book of Gestalt Psychology. 1938.
38. A. Yl̈a-J̈äaski and F. Ade. Grouping symmetrical structures for object segmentation and description. CVIU, 63(3):399-417, 1996.