The interestingness of images

Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 1633-1640

  Gygli, Michael ^a,b   Grabner, Helmut ^a,b   Riemenschneider, Hayko ^a   Nater, Fabian ^b   Gool, Luc Van ^a,b,c  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b upicto GmbH   (Switzerland)

^c IBBT   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Human Interest; Image Classification; Image Retrival; Interestingness

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SCIENCE; COMPUTERS; ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING;

HUMAN INTEREST; IMAGE RETRIVAL; INTERESTINGNESS; PRIOR KNOWLEDGE; PSYCHOPHYSICAL EXPERIMENTS; RETRIEVED IMAGES;

IMAGE CLASSIFICATION;

EID: 84898827031     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICCV.2013.205     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. R. Achanta, A. Shaji, K. Smith, A. Lucchi, P. Fua, and S. Susstrunk. SLIC superpixels compared to state-of-the-art superpixel methods. PAMI, 2012.
2. D. Berlyne. Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. McGraw-Hill, 1960.
3. I. Biederman and E. Vessel. Perceptual Pleasure and the Brain. American Scientist, 2006.
4. O. Boiman and M. Irani. Detecting irregularities in images and in video. In ICCV, 2005.
5. Y. Boykov, O. Veksler, and R. Zabih. Fast approximate energy minimization via graph cuts. PAMI, 2001.
6. M. M. Breunig, H.-P. Kriegel, R. T. Ng, and J. Sander. LOF: identifying density-based local outliers. In ACM Sigmod, 2000.
7. D. S. Butterfield, C. Fake, C. J. Henderson-Begg, and S. Mourachov. Interestingness ranking of media objects, patent application 20060242139.
8. C. Chang and C. Lin. LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines. ACM TIST, 2011.
9. A. Chen, P. Darst, and R. Pangrazi. An examination of situational interest and its sources. Brit. J. of Edu. Psychology, 2001.
10. R. Datta, D. Joshi, J. Li, and J. Z. Wang. Studying aesthetics in photographic images using a computational approach. In ECCV. 2006.
11. S. Dhar, V. Ordonez, and T. L. Berg. High level describable attributes for predicting aesthetics and interestingness. In CVPR, 2011.
12. H. Grabner, F. Nater, M. Druey, and L. Van Gool. Visual interestingness in Webcam-Streams. ACM MM, 2013.
13. P. Isola, D. Parikh, A. Torralba, and A. Oliva. Understanding the intrinsic memorability of images. J. of Vision, 2012.
14. P. Isola, J. Xiao, A. Torralba, and A. Oliva. What makes an image memorable? In CVPR, 2011.
15. Y. Ke, X. Tang, and F. Jing. The design of high-level features for photo quality assessment. In CVPR, 2006.
16. S. Lazebnik, C. Schmid, and J. Ponce. Beyond bags of features: Spatial pyramid matching for recognizing natural scene categories. In CVPR, 2006.
17. J. Machajdik and A. Hanbury. Affective image classification using features inspired by psychology and art theory. ACM MM, 2010.
18. A. Oliva and A. Torralba. Modeling the shape of the scene: A holistic representation of the spatial envelope. IJCV, 2001.
19. T. Schaul, L. Pape, T. Glasmachers, V. Graziano, and J. Schmidhuber. Coherence progress: A measure of interestingness based on fixed compressors. In AGI, 2011.
20. P. J. Silvia. Interest-The Curious Emotion. CDPS, 2008.
21. C. A. Smith and P. C. Ellsworth. Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. J. of of Personality and Social Psychology, 1985.
22. J. Tighe and S. Lazebnik. Superparsing: scalable nonparametric image parsing with superpixels. In ECCV. 2010.
23. A. Torralba. How many pixels make an image. Visual neuroscience, 2009.
24. S. A. Turner Jr and P. J. Silvia. Must interesting things be pleasant? A test of competing appraisal structures. Emotion, 2006.
25. P. Valdez and A. Mehrabian. Effects of color on emotions. J. of Experimental Psychology, 1994.
26. E. A. Vessel and N. Rubin. Beauty and the beholder : Highly individual taste for abstract , but not real-world images. J. of Vision, 2010.
27. G. K.Wallace. The JPEG still picture compression standard. Comm. of the ACM, 1991.