Evaluating evidence: Defining levels and quality using critical appraisal mixed methods tools

Health Environments Research and Design Journal

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 144-151

  Taylor, Ellen ^a,b   Hignett, Sue ^a  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b The Center for Health Design California   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision making; Evidence based design; Hospital; Literature review; Outcomes

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898824093     PISSN: 19375867     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/193758671400700310     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Aveyard, H. (2010). Doing a literature review in health and social care: A practical guide (2nd ed.). Maidenhead, England: McGraw-Hill International.
2. Bell, J. L., Collins, J. W., Wolf, L., Grönqvist, R., Chiou, S., Chang, W.-R., Evanoff, B. (2008). Evaluation of a comprehensive slip, trip and fall prevention programme for hospital employees. Ergonomics, 51(12), 1906-1925.
3. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. (2009). Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. Layerthorpe, England: University of York. Retrieved from http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/pdf/Systematic_Reviews.pdf
4. Crowe, M., & Sheppard, L. (2011). A review of critical appraisal tools show they lack rigor: Alternative tool structure is proposed. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64(1), 79-89.
5. Davies, B., & Logan, J. (2012). Reading research: A user-friendly guide for nurses and other health professionals (5th ed.). Toronto, Canada: Mosby/Elsevier.
6. Drahota, A. K., Ward, D., Udell, J. E., Soilemezi, D., Ogollah, R., Higgins, B., Severs, M. (2013). Pilot cluster randomised controlled trial of flooring to reduce injuries from falls in wards for older people. Age and Ageing, 42(5), 633-640.
7. Hamilton, D. K. (2011). What constitutes best practice in healthcare design? Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 4(2), 121-126.
8. Hignett, S. (2003). Systematic review of patient handling activities starting in lying, sitting and standing positions. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 41(6), 545-552.
9. Krauss, B. M. J., Tutlam, N., Costantinou, E., Johnson, S., Jackson, D., & Fraser, V. J. (2008). Intervention to prevent falls on the medical service in a teaching hospital. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 29(6), 539-545.
10. Marquardt, G., & Motzek, T. (2013). How to rate the quality of a research paper: Introducing a helpful algorithm for architects and designers. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 6(2), 119-127.
11. National Research Council. (2004). Advancing scientific research in education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=11112
12. Pace, R., Pluye, P., Bartlett, G., Macaulay, A. C., Salsberg, J., Jagosh, J., & Seller, R. (2012). Testing the reliability and efficiency of the pilot mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT) for systematic mixed studies review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 49(1), 47-53.
13. Pati, D. (2011). A framework for evaluating evidence in evidence-based design. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 4(3), 50-71.
14. Pluye, P., Gagnon, M.-P., Griffiths, F., & Johnson-Lafleur, J. (2009). A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in Mixed Studies Reviews. Clinical Research, 46(4), 529-546.
15. Pluye, P., & Hong, Q. N. (2014). Combining the power of stories and the power of numbers: Mixed Methods research and Mixed Studies Reviews. Annual Review of Public Health, 35 (Epub ahead of print), 2.1-2.17.
16. Pluye, P., Robert, E., Cargo, M., Bartlett, G., O'Cathain, A., Griffiths, F., Rousseau, M. C. (2011). Proposal: A mixed methods appraisal tool for systematic mixed studies reviews. Retrieved from http://mixedmethodsappraisaltoolpublic.pbworks.com/f/MMAT%202011%20criteria%20and%20tutorial%202011-06-29.pdf
17. Shea, B. J., Grimshaw, J. M., Wells, G. A., Boers, M., Andersson, N., Hamel, C., Bouter, L. M. (2007). Development of AMSTAR: A measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 7(10).
18. Shea, B. J., Hamel, C., Wells, G. A., Bouter, L. M., Kristjansson, E., Grimshaw, J., Boers, M. (2009). AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(10), 1013-1020.
19. Stichler, J. F. (2010). Weighing the evidence. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 3(4), 3-7.
20. Tzeng, H. M., & Yin, C. Y. (2008). The extrinsic risk factors for inpatient falls in hospital patient rooms. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 23(3), 233-41.
21. Vassallo, M., Azeem, T., Pirwani, M. F., Sharma, J. C., & Allen, S. C. (2000). An epidemiological study of falls on integrated general medical wards. International Journal of Clinical Practice, 54(10), 654-7.
22. Vieira, E. R., Berean, C., Paches, D., Costa, L., Decombas-Deschamps, N., Caveny, P., Ballash, L. (2011). Risks and suggestions to prevent falls in geriatric rehabilitation: A participatory approach. BMJ Quality & Safety, 20(5), 440-448.
23. Warren, C. J., & Hanger, H. C. (2013). Fall and fracture rates following a change from carpet to vinyl floor coverings in a geriatric rehabilitation hospital. A longitudinal, observational study. Clinical Rehabilitation, 27(3), 258-263.