메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 119-127

How to rate the quality of a research paper: Introducing a helpful algorithm for architects and designers

Author keywords

Decision making; Evidence based design; Methodology

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; DECISION MAKING; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; RESEARCH;

EID: 84884707784     PISSN: 19375867     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/193758671300600210     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (17)

References (20)
  • 3
    • 79958796525 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A systematic approach to the inclusion of evidence in healthcare design
    • Brown, C. E., & Ecoff, L. (2011). A systematic approach to the inclusion of evidence in healthcare design. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 4(2), 7-16.
    • (2011) Health Environments Research & Design Journal , vol.4 , Issue.2 , pp. 7-16
    • Brown, C.E.1    Ecoff, L.2
  • 4
    • 84884724026 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in healthcare (3rd ed.)
    • Centre for Reviews and Dissemination
    • Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (2009). CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in healthcare (3rd ed.). York, England: York Publishing Services.
    • (2009) York England: York Publishing Services.
  • 7
    • 43049113533 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • GRADE: An emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
    • Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., & Schunemann, H. J. (2008b). GRADE: An emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ, 336(7650), 924-926.
    • (2008) BMJ , vol.336 , Issue.7650 , pp. 924-926
    • Guyatt, G.H.1    Oxman, A.D.2    Vist, G.E.3    Kunz, R.4    Falck-Ytter, Y.5    Alonso-Coello, P.6    Schunemann, H.J.7
  • 9
    • 79958808044 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • What constitutes best practice in healthcare design?
    • Hamilton, D. K. (2011). What constitutes best practice in healthcare design? Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 4(2), 121-126.
    • (2011) Health Environments Research & Design Journal , vol.4 , Issue.2 , pp. 121-126
    • Hamilton, D.K.1
  • 10
    • 84884727876 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Guideline Development Methods: 7 Reviewing and grading the evidence
    • Retrieved from
    • National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. (2004). Guideline Development Methods: 7 Reviewing and grading the evidence. Retrieved from http://www.nice.org.uk/niceMedia/pdf/ GDM_Chapter7_0305.pdf
    • (2004) National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.
  • 11
    • 84884729461 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Oxford 2011 Levels of Evidence
    • OCEBM: Levels of Evidence Working Group.
    • OCEBM: Levels of Evidence Working Group. (2009). The Oxford 2011 Levels of Evidence. Oxford, England: Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine.
    • (2009) Oxford, England: Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine.
  • 12
    • 80053396561 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A framework for evaluating evidence in evidencebased design
    • Pati, D. (2011). A framework for evaluating evidence in evidencebased design. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 4(3), 50-71.
    • (2011) Health Environments Research & Design Journal , vol.4 , Issue.3 , pp. 50-71
    • Pati, D.1
  • 15
    • 80053408847 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Research methods for design practitioners to evaluate facilities
    • Shepley, M. M. (2011). Research methods for design practitioners to evaluate facilities. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 4(3), 7-13.
    • (2011) Health Environments Research & Design Journal , vol.4 , Issue.3 , pp. 7-13
    • Shepley, M.M.1
  • 17
    • 84860229597 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Research or evidence-based design: which process should we be using?
    • Stichler, J. F. (2010a). Research or evidence-based design: which process should we be using? Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 4(1), 6-10.
    • (2010) Health Environments Research & Design Journal , vol.4 , Issue.1 , pp. 6-10
    • Stichler, J.F.1
  • 20
    • 28044463360 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The integrative review: updated methodology
    • Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546-553.
    • (2005) Journal of Advanced Nursing , vol.52 , Issue.5 , pp. 546-553
    • Whittemore, R.1    Knafl, K.2


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.