-
1
-
-
77955232685
-
AACN levels of evidence: What's new?
-
Armola, R. R., Bourgault, A. M., Halm, M. A., Board, R. M., Bucher, L., Harrington, • Medina, J. (2009). AACN levels of evidence: What's new? Critical Care Nurse, 29(4), 70-73.
-
(2009)
Critical Care Nurse
, vol.29
, Issue.4
, pp. 70-73
-
-
Armola, R.R.1
Bourgault, A.M.2
Halm, M.A.3
Board, R.M.4
Bucher, L.5
Harrington, L.6
Medina, J.7
-
2
-
-
79951955198
-
GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence.
-
Balshem, H., Helfand, M., Schunemann, H. J., Oxman, A. D., Kunz, R., Brozek, J.,•Guyatt, G. H. (2011). GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64(4), 401-406.
-
(2011)
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
, vol.64
, Issue.4
, pp. 401-406
-
-
Balshem, H.1
Helfand, M.2
Schunemann, H.J.3
Oxman, A.D.4
Kunz, R.5
Brozek, J.6
Guyatt, G.H.7
-
3
-
-
79958796525
-
A systematic approach to the inclusion of evidence in healthcare design
-
Brown, C. E., & Ecoff, L. (2011). A systematic approach to the inclusion of evidence in healthcare design. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 4(2), 7-16.
-
(2011)
Health Environments Research & Design Journal
, vol.4
, Issue.2
, pp. 7-16
-
-
Brown, C.E.1
Ecoff, L.2
-
4
-
-
84884724026
-
CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in healthcare (3rd ed.)
-
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination
-
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (2009). CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in healthcare (3rd ed.). York, England: York Publishing Services.
-
(2009)
York England: York Publishing Services.
-
-
-
5
-
-
84947648720
-
A hierarchy of evidence for assessing qualitative health research
-
Daly, J., Willis, K., Small, R., Green, J., Welch, N., Kealy, M., & Hughes, E. (2007). A hierarchy of evidence for assessing qualitative health research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 43-49.
-
(2007)
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
, vol.60
, Issue.1
, pp. 43-49
-
-
Daly, J.1
Willis, K.2
Small, R.3
Green, J.4
Welch, N.5
Kealy, M.6
Hughes, E.7
-
6
-
-
43749120754
-
Going from evidence to recommendations
-
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Vist, G. E., Liberati, A., & Schunemann, H. J. (2008a). Going from evidence to recommendations. BMJ, 336(7652), 1049-1051.
-
(2008)
BMJ
, vol.336
, Issue.7652
, pp. 1049-1051
-
-
Guyatt, G.H.1
Oxman, A.D.2
Kunz, R.3
Falck-Ytter, Y.4
Vist, G.E.5
Liberati, A.6
Schunemann, H.J.7
-
7
-
-
43049113533
-
GRADE: An emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
-
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., & Schunemann, H. J. (2008b). GRADE: An emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ, 336(7650), 924-926.
-
(2008)
BMJ
, vol.336
, Issue.7650
, pp. 924-926
-
-
Guyatt, G.H.1
Oxman, A.D.2
Vist, G.E.3
Kunz, R.4
Falck-Ytter, Y.5
Alonso-Coello, P.6
Schunemann, H.J.7
-
8
-
-
0030198414
-
Rating the quality of evidence for clinical practice guidelines
-
Hadorn, D. C., Baker, D., Hodges, J. S., & Hicks, N. (1996). Rating the quality of evidence for clinical practice guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 49(7), 749-754.
-
(1996)
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
, vol.49
, Issue.7
, pp. 749-754
-
-
Hadorn, D.C.1
Baker, D.2
Hodges, J.S.3
Hicks, N.4
-
9
-
-
79958808044
-
What constitutes best practice in healthcare design?
-
Hamilton, D. K. (2011). What constitutes best practice in healthcare design? Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 4(2), 121-126.
-
(2011)
Health Environments Research & Design Journal
, vol.4
, Issue.2
, pp. 121-126
-
-
Hamilton, D.K.1
-
10
-
-
84884727876
-
Guideline Development Methods: 7 Reviewing and grading the evidence
-
Retrieved from
-
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. (2004). Guideline Development Methods: 7 Reviewing and grading the evidence. Retrieved from http://www.nice.org.uk/niceMedia/pdf/ GDM_Chapter7_0305.pdf
-
(2004)
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.
-
-
-
11
-
-
84884729461
-
The Oxford 2011 Levels of Evidence
-
OCEBM: Levels of Evidence Working Group.
-
OCEBM: Levels of Evidence Working Group. (2009). The Oxford 2011 Levels of Evidence. Oxford, England: Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine.
-
(2009)
Oxford, England: Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine.
-
-
-
12
-
-
80053396561
-
A framework for evaluating evidence in evidencebased design
-
Pati, D. (2011). A framework for evaluating evidence in evidencebased design. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 4(3), 50-71.
-
(2011)
Health Environments Research & Design Journal
, vol.4
, Issue.3
, pp. 50-71
-
-
Pati, D.1
-
13
-
-
0033254760
-
A model for change to evidence-based practice
-
Rosswurm, M. A., & Larrabee, J. H. (1999). A model for change to evidence-based practice. Image-The Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 31(4), 317-322.
-
(1999)
Image-The Journal of Nursing Scholarship
, vol.31
, Issue.4
, pp. 317-322
-
-
Rosswurm, M.A.1
Larrabee, J.H.2
-
14
-
-
85039636436
-
Research methods in psychology (9th ed).
-
Shaughnessy, J. J., Zechmeister, E. B., & Zechmeister, J. S. (2012). Research methods in psychology (9th ed.). New York, N.Y: Mc- Graw-Hill.
-
(2012)
New York, N.Y: Mc- Graw-Hill.
-
-
Shaughnessy, J.J.1
Zechmeister, E.B.2
Zechmeister, J.S.3
-
15
-
-
80053408847
-
Research methods for design practitioners to evaluate facilities
-
Shepley, M. M. (2011). Research methods for design practitioners to evaluate facilities. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 4(3), 7-13.
-
(2011)
Health Environments Research & Design Journal
, vol.4
, Issue.3
, pp. 7-13
-
-
Shepley, M.M.1
-
17
-
-
84860229597
-
Research or evidence-based design: which process should we be using?
-
Stichler, J. F. (2010a). Research or evidence-based design: which process should we be using? Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 4(1), 6-10.
-
(2010)
Health Environments Research & Design Journal
, vol.4
, Issue.1
, pp. 6-10
-
-
Stichler, J.F.1
-
19
-
-
0012689673
-
Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence
-
(Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 47. AHRQ Publication No. 02-E016.)
-
West, S., King, V., Carey, T., Lohr, K., McKoy, N., Sutton, F., & Lux, L. (2002, April). Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. (Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 47. AHRQ Publication No. 02-E016.) Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
-
(2002)
Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
-
-
West, S.1
King, V.2
Carey, T.3
Lohr, K.4
McKoy, N.5
Sutton, F.6
Lux, L.7
-
20
-
-
28044463360
-
The integrative review: updated methodology
-
Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546-553.
-
(2005)
Journal of Advanced Nursing
, vol.52
, Issue.5
, pp. 546-553
-
-
Whittemore, R.1
Knafl, K.2
|