Query-adaptive asymmetrical dissimilarities for visual object retrieval

Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 1705-1712

  Zhu, Cai Zhi ^a   Jegou, Herve ^b   Satoh, Shin'Ichi ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF INFORMATICS   (Japan)

^b INRIA   (France)

Author keywords

asymmetrical dissimilarity; distance metric; instance search; visual object retrieval

Indexed keywords

DATABASE SYSTEMS;

ASYMMETRICAL DISSIMILARITY; DATABASE IMAGES; DISTANCE METRICS; INSTANCE SEARCH; INVERTED FILES; SEARCH EFFICIENCY; TEXT RETRIEVAL; VISUAL OBJECTS;

QUERY PROCESSING;

EID: 84898817389     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICCV.2013.214     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. R. Arandjelovic and A. Zisserman. Multiple queries for large scale specific object retrieval. In BMVC, 2012.
2. R. Arandjelovic and A. Zisserman. Three things everyone should know to improve object retrieval. In CVPR, 2012.
3. O. Chum, J. Philbin, J. Sivic, M. Isard, and A. Zisserman. Total recall: Automatic query expansion with a generative feature model for object retrieval. In ICCV, 2007.
4. S. C. Hoi, R. Jin, J. Zhu, and M. R. Lyu. Semi-supervised SVM batch mode active learning for image retrieval. In CVPR, 2008.
5. H. Jegou, M. Douze, and C. Schmid. Hamming embedding and weak geometric consistency for large scale image search. In ECCV, 2008.
6. H. Jegou, M. Douze, and C. Schmid. On the burstiness of visual elements. In CVPR, 2009.
7. H. Jegou, H. Harzallah, and C. Schmid. A contextual dissimilarity measure for accurate and efficient image search. In CVPR, 2007.
8. B. Kulis, K. Saenko, and T. Darrell. What you saw is not what you get: Domain adaptation using asymmetric kernel transforms. In CVPR, 2011.
9. S. Kullback and R. A. Leibler. On information and sufficiency. Ann. Math. Statist., 22(1):79-86, 1951.
10. D. Lowe. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant key points. IJCV, 60:91-110, 2004.
11. C. D. Manning, P. Raghavan, and H. Schutze. An Introduction to Information Retrieval. Cambridge University Press, 2009.
12. K. Mikolajczyk and C. Schmid. Scale & affine invariant interest point detectors. IJCV, 1:63-86, 2004.
13. D. Nister and H. Stewenius. Scalable recognition with a vocabulary tree. In CVPR, 2006.
14. O. Paul, G. Awad, J. Fiscus, G. Sanders, and B. Shaw. Trecvid 2012-an introduction of the goals, tasks, data, evaluation mechanisms and metrics. In TRECVID, 2012.
15. M. Perdoch, O. Chum, and J. Matas. Efficient representation of local geometry for large scale object retrieval. In CVPR, 2009.
16. J. Philbin, O. Chum, M. Isard, J. Sivic, and A. Zisserman. Object retrieval with large vocabularies and fast spatial matching. In CVPR, 2007.
17. J. Philbin, O. Chum, M. Isard, J. Sivic, and A. Zisserman. Lost in quantization: Improving particular object retrieval in large scale image databases. In CVPR, 2008.
18. S. E. Robertson and K. S. Jones. Relevance weighting of search terms. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27(3), 1976.
19. S. E. Robertson, S. Walker, S. Jones, M. Hancock-Beaulieu, and M. Gatford. Okapi at TREC-3. In TREC, 1994.
20. G. Salton and M. J. McGill. Introduction to modern information retrieval. McGraw-Hill, 1983.
21. J. Sivic and A. Zisserman. Video google: A text retrieval approach to object matching in videos. In ICCV, 2003.
22. P. Tirilly and V. Claveau. Distances and weighting schemes for bag of visual words image retrieval. In ICMR, 2010.
23. W. Zhou, Y. Lu, H. Li, Y. Song, and Q. Tian. Spatial coding for large scale partial-duplicate web image search. In ACM Multimedia, 2010.
24. C.-Z. Zhu and S. Satoh. Large vocabulary quantization for searching instances from videos. In ICMR, 2012.