E-cient representation of local geometry for large scale object retrieval

2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 9-16

  Perd'och, Michal ^a   Chum, Ondřej ^a   Matas, Jiří ^a  

^a CZECH TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY IN PRAGUE   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GEOMETRY; IMAGE RETRIEVAL; SCALES (WEIGHING INSTRUMENTS);

DOCUMENT FREQUENCY; FEATURE DESCRIPTION; LARGE-SCALE OBJECTS; LARGE-SCALE PROBLEM; REPROJECTION ERROR; RETRIEVAL ALGORITHMS; RETRIEVAL PERFORMANCE; STATE-OF-THE-ART METHODS;

COMPUTER VISION;

EID: 70450179951     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CVPRW.2009.5206529     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. O. Chum, J. Matas, and J. Kittler. Locally optimized RANSAC. In DAGM, pages 236-243, 2003.
2. O. Chum, J. Philbin, J. Sivic, M. Isard, and A. Zisserman. Total recall: Automatic query expansion with a generative feature model for object retrieval. In ICCV, 2007.
3. J. Hays and A. A. Efros. Scene completion using millions of photographs. ACM Transactions on Graphics (SIG- GRAPH 2007), 26(3), 2007.
4. http://maps.google.com/help/maps/streetview/.
5. http://www.ickr.com/.
6. http://www.panoramio.com/.
7. H. Jegou, M. Douze, and C. Schmid. Hamming embedding and weak geometric consistency for large scale image search. In ECCV, 2008.
8. H. Jegou, M. Douze, and C. Schmid. Hamming embedding and weak geometry consistency for large scale image search - extended version. Technical report, INRIA, 2008.
9. S. Lazebnik, C. Schmid, and J. Ponce. Beyond bags of features: Spatial pyramid matching for recognizing natural scene categories. In CVPR, pages 2169-2178, 2006.
10. V. Lepetit, P. Lagger, and P. Fua. Randomized trees for real-time keypoint recognition. In CVPR, volume 2, pages 775-781, 2005.
11. T. Lindeberg. Feature detection with automatic scale selection. IJCV, 30(2):79-116, 1998. (Pubitemid 128517917)
12. D. Lowe. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. IJCV, 60(2):91-110, 2004.
13. K. Mikolajczyk and C. Schmid. An affine invariant interest point detector. In ECCV, pages 128-142, 2002.
14. K. Mikolajczyk, T. Tuytelaars, C. Schmid, A. Zisserman, J. Matas, F. Scha-alitzky, T. Kadir, and L. V. Gool. A comparison of affine region detectors. IJCV, 65(1-2):43-72, 2005.
15. D. Nister and H. Stewenius. Scalable recognition with a vocabulary tree. In CVPR, 2006.
16. S. Obdrzalek and J. Matas. Object recognition using local affine frames on distinguished regions. In BMVC, pages 113-122, 2002.
17. S. Obdrzalek and J. Matas. Sub-linear indexing for large scale object recognition. In BMVC, 2005.
18. J. Philbin, O. Chum, M. Isard, J. Sivic, and A. Zisserman. Object retrieval with large vocabularies and fast spatial matching. In CVPR, 2007.
19. J. Philbin, O. Chum, M. Isard, J. Sivic, and A. Zisserman. Lost in quantization: Improving particular object retrieval in large scale image databases. In CVPR, 2008.
20. J. Sivic and A. Zisserman. Video Google: A text retrieval approach to object matching in videos. In ICCV, 2003.
21. A. Torralba, R. Fergus, and Y.Weiss. Small codes and large image databases for recognition. In CVPR, 2008.