Does postoperative drain amylase predict pancreatic fistula after pancreatectomy?

Journal of the American College of Surgeons

Volumn 218, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 978-987

  Israel, Jacqueline S ^a   Rettammel, Robert J ^a   Leverson, Glen E ^a   Hanks, Laura R ^a   Cho, Clifford S ^a   Winslow, Emily R ^a   Weber, Sharon M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMYLASE; CEPHALOSPORIN; HEMOSTATIC AGENT; OCTREOTIDE; SILASTIC;

ABDOMINAL DRAIN; ABDOMINAL DRAINAGE; ABSORBABLE SUTURE; ADULT; AGED; AMYLASE BLOOD LEVEL; BILE DUCT CARCINOMA; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER SURGERY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONSENSUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DISEASE COURSE; DRAIN FLUID AMYLASE; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FEMALE; GASTRODUODENAL ARTERY; GASTROENTEROPANCREATIC NEUROENDOCRINE TUMOR; GASTROINTESTINAL HEMORRHAGE; GASTROINTESTINAL STAPLER; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; JEHOVAH'S WITNESS; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIMODALITY CANCER THERAPY; NASOGASTRIC TUBE; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; PANCREAS ADENOCARCINOMA; PANCREAS DUCT; PANCREAS FISTULA; PANCREAS RESECTION; PANCREAS TUMOR; PANCREATIC DUCT STENT; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; PATHOLOGY; PERITONEAL FLUID; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREDICTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCALPEL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEPSIS; SURGICAL MORTALITY; VATER PAPILLA CARCINOMA; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AMYLASES; DRAINAGE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREAS; PANCREATECTOMY; PANCREATIC FISTULA; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84898800932     PISSN: 10727515     EISSN: 18791190     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.01.048     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. C. Bassi, C. Dervenis, and G. Butturini et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: An international study group (ISGPF) definition Surgery 138 2005 8 13
2. E. Molinari, C. Bassi, and R. Salvia et al. Amylase value in drains after pancreatic resection as predictive factor of postoperative pancreatic fistula Ann Surg 246 2007 281 287
3. H. Shinchi, K. Wada, and L. Traverso The usefulness of drain data to identify a clinically relevant pancreatic anastomotic leak after pancreaticoduodenectomy? J Gastrointest Surg 10 2006 490 498
4. S. Crippa, R. Salvia, and M. Falconi et al. Anastomotic leakage in pancreatic surgery HPB (Oxford) 9 2007 8 15
5. W.B. Pratt, M.P. Callery, and C.M. Vollmer Risk prediction for development of pancreatic fistula using the ISGPF classification scheme World J Surg 32 2008 419 428
6. N.O. Machado Pancreatic fistula after pancreatectomy: definitions, risk factors, preventive measures, and management - review Int J Surg Oncol 2012 April 24 10.1155/2012/602478
7. Pitt H. Pancreatectomy Demonstration Project. Presented at the 2013 ACS NSQIP National Conference; July 2013. Available at: http://www.acsnsqip.org/ nsqippublicdocs/service?pubid=2013confpres&docid=27718.
8. C. Bassi, E. Molinari, and G. Malleo et al. Early versus late drain removal after standard pancreatic resections: results of a prospective randomized trial Ann Surg 252 2010 207 214
9. N.N. Nissen, V.G. Menon, and V. Puri et al. A simple algorithm for drain management after pancreaticoduodenectomy Am Surg 78 2012 1143 1146
10. D.J. Moskovic, S.E. Hodges, and M. Wu et al. Drain data to predict clinically relevant pancreatic fistula HPB 12 2010 472 481
11. M. Kawai, S. Kondo, and H. Yamaue et al. Predictive risk factors for clinically relevant pancreatic fistula analyzed in 1,239 patients with pancreaticoduodenectomy: multicenter data collection as a project study of pancreatic surgery by the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 18 2011 601 608
12. A. El Nakeeb, T. Salah, and A. Sultan et al. Pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Risk factors, clinical predictors, and management (single center experience) World J Surg 37 2013 1405 1418
13. W.C. Liao, K.L. Chien, and Y.L. Lin et al. Adjuvant treatments for resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis Lancet Oncol 14 2013 1095 1103
14. M.J. Morak, A. van der Gaast, and L. Incrocci et al. Adjuvant intra-arterial chemotherapy and radiotherapy versus surgery alone in resectable pancreatic and periampullary cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial Ann Surg 248 2008 1031 1041
15. M. Kawai, M. Tani, and H. Terasawa et al. Early removal of prophylactic drains reduces the risk of intra-abdominal infections in patients with pancreatic head resection: prospective study for 104 consecutive patients Ann Surg 244 2006 1 7
16. K.C. Conlon, D. Labow, and D. Leung et al. Prospective randomized clinical trial of the value of intraperitoneal drainage after pancreatic resection Ann Surg 234 2001 487 493
17. S.E. Lee, Y.J. Ahn, J.Y. Jang, and S.W. Kim Prospective randomized pilot trial comparing closed suction drainage and gravity drainage of the pancreatic duct in pancreaticojejunostomy J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16 2009 837 843
18. G. Van Buren, M. Bloomston, and S. Hughes et al. A randomized prospective multicenter trial of pancreaticoduodenectomy with and without routine intraperitoneal drainage Ann Surg 2013 Dec 26 [Epub ahead of print]
19. S.M. Strasberg, D.C. Linehan, and P.-A. Clavien et al. Proposal for definition and severity grading of pancreatic anastomosis failure and pancreatic occlusion failure Surgery 141 2007 420 426
20. M.L. DeOliveira, J.M. Winter, and M. Schafer et al. Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery Ann Surg 244 2006 931 939
21. B.N. Fahy, C.F. Frey, and H.S. Ho et al. Morbidity, mortality, and technical factors of distal pancreatectomy Am J Surg 183 2002 237 241
22. M. Yamaguchi, H. Nakano, and T. Midorikawa et al. Prediction of pancreatic fistula by amylase levels of drainage fluid on the first day after pancreatectomy Hepatogastroenterology 50 2003 1155 1158
23. R.P. Sutcliffe, N. Battula, and A. Haque et al. Utility of drain fluid amylase measurement on the first postoperative day after pancreaticoduodenectomy World J Surg 36 2012 879 883
24. M. Tsujie, S. Nakamori, and A. Miyamoto et al. Risk factors of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy - patients with low drain amylase level on postoperative day 1 are safe from developing pancreatic fistula Hepatogastroenterology 59 2012 2657 2660
25. H. Choon-Kiat, J. Kleeff, H. Friess, and M.W. Buchler Complications of pancreatic surgery HPB (Oxford) 7 2005 99 108
26. F.R. Spitz, J.L. Abbruzzese, and J.E. Lee et al. Preoperative and postoperative chemoradiation strategies in patients treated with pancreaticoduodenctomy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas J Clin Oncol 15 1997 928 937
27. J.E. Lim, M.W. Chien, and C.C. Earle Prognostic factors following curative resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a population-based, linked database analysis of 396 patients Ann Surg 237 2003 74 85
28. B.A. Whitson, E. Richardson, P.A. Iaizzo, and D.J. Hess Not every bulb is a rose: a functional comparison of bulb suction devices J Surg Res 156 2009 270 273
29. S.R. Grobmyer, D. Graham, M.F. Brennan, and D. Coit High-pressure gradients generated by closed-suction surgical drainage systems Surg Infect (Larchmt) 3 2002 245 249
30. H. Petrowsky, N. Demartines, and V. Rousson et al. Evidence-based value of prophylactic drainage in gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analyses Ann Surg 240 2004 1074 1084
31. L. Rosenburg, P. MacNeil, and L. Turcotte Economic evaluation of the use of octreotide for prevention of complications following pancreatic resection J Gastrointest Surg 3 1999 225 232
32. M.P. Callery, W.B. Pratt, and T.S. Kent et al. A prospectively validated clinical risk score accurately predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy J Am Coll Surg 216 2013 1 14
33. Riall TS. NSQIP: Pancreatectomy Demonstration Project. Presented at the 2013 ACS NSQIP National Conference; July 2013. Available at: http://www.acsnsqip.org/nsqippublicdocs/service?pubid=2013confpres&docid= 27721.
34. American College of Surgeons. National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP). Available at: http://site.acsnsqip.org. Accessed February 25, 2014.