Ethical and privacy principles for learning analytics

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 438-450

  Pardo, Abelardo ^a   Siemens, George ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY;

ETHICAL ISSUES; LEARNING ANALYTICS; LEARNING EXPERIENCES; LEARNING PROCESS; PRIVACY ISSUE; PRIVACY PRINCIPLE;

PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECTS;

EID: 84898796786     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12152     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Australian Government (2006). Private sector information sheet 1A-national privacy principles. Sydney: Office of the Privacy Commissioner.
2. Bosker, B., (2012). Google privacy policy changing for everyone: so what's really going to happen? The Huffington Post. Retrieved March 24, 2014, from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/29/google-privacy-policy-changes-n- 1310506.html
3. Brinkman, B., (2012). An analysis of student privacy rights in the use of plagiarism detection systems. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19, 3, 1255-1266.
4. Bull, S., &, Kay, J., (2007). Student models that invite the learner in: the SMILI:() open learner modelling framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 17, 2, 89-120.
5. Campbell, J. P., DeBlois, P. B., &, Oblinger, D. G., (2007). Academic analytics. Educause Review, 42, 1-24. EDUCAUSE White Paper.
6. Canadian Standards Association (2001). Model code for the protection of personal information (pp. 7-8). Ontario: Canadian Standards Association. (No. CAN/CSA-Q830-96).
7. Cheverie, J., (2012). Data protection reform legislation in the European Union. EDUCAUSE Blog. Retrieved March 24, 2014, from http://www.educause.edu/ blogs/cheverij/data-protection-reform-legislation-european-union
8. Crook, M. A., (2011). The risks of absolute medical confidentiality. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19, 1, 107-122.
9. Deng, M., Wuyts, K., Scandariato, R., Preneel, B., &, Joosen, W., (2010). A privacy threat analysis framework: supporting the elicitation and fulfillment of privacy requirements. Requirements Engineering, 16, 1, 3-32.
10. Elgesem, D., (1999). The structure of rights in directive 95/46/EC on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and the free movement of such data. Ethics and Information Technology, 1, 283-293.
11. FTC (2010). Protecting consumer privacy in an era of rapid change (pp. 1-122). Washington: Federal Trade Commission.
12. Haggerty, K. D., &, Ericson, R. V., (2000). The surveillant assemblage. British Journal of Sociology, 51, 4, 605-622.
13. Ipsos MediaCT. (2011). Mobile internet & smartphone adoption Vol. 2011 (pp. 1-12). Germany: Ipsos MediaCT.
14. Kay, D., Korn, N., &, Oppenheim, C., (2012). Legal, risk and ethical aspects of analytics in higher education. CETIS Analytics Series, 1, 6, 1-30.
15. Kirkpatrick, M., (2010, January). Facebook's Zuckerberg says the age of privacy is over. Readwrite Web. Retrieved March 24, 2014, from http://readwrite.com/2010/01/09/facebooks-zuckerberg-says-the-age-of-privacy-is- ov
16. Klasnja, P., Consolvo, S., &, Choudhury, T., (2009). Exploring privacy concerns about personal sensing. In, H. Tokuda, M. Beigl, A. Friday, A. J. Bernheim Brush, &, Y. Tobe, (Eds). International conference pervasive (pp. 176-183). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
17. Knijnenburg, B. P., &, Kobsa, A., (2012). Making decisions about privacy: information disclosure in context-aware recommender systems. Public policy. Irvine: University of California.
18. Kobsa, A., (2007). Privacy-enhanced web personalization. In, P. Brusilovsky, A. Kobsa, &, W. Nejdl, (Eds). The adaptive web (pp. 628-670). Berlin: Springer. (Pubitemid 351189213)
19. Koehn, D., (2003). The nature of and conditions for online trust. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 1/2, 3-19. (Pubitemid 38097380)
20. Le Métayer, D., (2009). A formal privacy management framework. Formal Aspects in Security and Trust, 5491, 162-176.
21. Le Métayer, D., (2010). Privacy by design: a matter of choice. In, S. Gutwirth, Y. Poullet, &, P. De Hert, (Eds). Data Protection in a Profiled World (pp. 1-6). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
22. Lewis, K., Kaufman, J., &, Christakis, N., (2008). The taste for privacy: an analysis of college student privacy settings in an online social network. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 1, 79-100.
23. Martin, K. E., (2011). TMI (too much information): the role of friction and familiarity in disclosing information. Business & Professional Ethics Journal, 30, 1-2.
24. Narayanan, A., &, Shmatikov, V., (2010). Myths and fallacies of "personally identifiable information.". Communications of the ACM, 53, 6, 24.
25. Nissenbaum, H., (2004). Privacy as contextual integrity. Washington Law Review, 79, 1, 101-139.
26. Ohm, P., (2010). Broken promises of privacy: responding to the surprising failure of anonymization. UCLA Law Review, 57, 1701-1777.
27. Oravec, J. A., (1999). Integrating privacy studies into. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 8, 1, 55-70.
28. Palen, L., &, Dourish, P., (2003). Unpacking "privacy" for a networked world. In, G. Cockton, &, P. Korhonen, (Eds). Proceedings of the conference on Human factors in computing systems-CHI '03 (p. 129). New York: ACM Press. doi: 10.1145/642633.642635.
29. Poullet, Y., (2010). About the e-privacy directive: towards a third generation of data protection legislation? Data Protection in a Profiled World (pp. 3-30). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
30. Privacy Rights Clearinghouse (1999). Privacy rights handbook (p. 335). New York: Harper Perennial.
31. Rouvroy, A., (2008). Privacy, data protection, and the unprecedented challenges of ambient intelligence. Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology, 2, 1, 1-54.
32. Schwartz, P. M., (2011). Privacy, ethics, and analytics. IEEE Security & Privacy, 9, 3, 66-69.
33. Siemens, G., &, Long, P., (2011). Penetrating the fog: analytics in learning and education. Educause Review, 48, 5, 31-40.
34. Singer, N., (2012). E-tailer customization: convenient or creepy? New York Times, New York.
35. Slade, S., &, Prinsloo, P., (2013). Learning analytics: ethical issues and dilemmas. American Behavioral Scientist, 57, 10, 1510-1529.
36. Smith, H. J., Dinev, T., &, Xu, H., (2011). Information privacy research: an interdisciplinary review. MIS Quarterly, 35, 4, 989-1015.
37. Solove, D., (2008). Understanding privacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38. Souppouris, A., (2012). LinkedIn investigating reports that 6.46 million hashed passwords have leaked online. The Verge. Retrieved March 24, 2014, from http://www.theverge.com/2012/6/6/3067523/linkedin-password-leak-online
39. Spiekermann, S., (2009). Engineering privacy. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 35, 1, 67-82.
40. Sprenger, P., (1999). Sun on privacy: "get over it". Wired Magazine. Retrieved March 24, 2014, from http://www.wired.com/politics/law/news/ 1999/01/17538
41. Svensson, S., &, Hansson, S. O., (2007). Protecting people in research: a comparison between biomedical and traffic research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 13, 1, 99-115.
42. Tavani, H. T., (2007). Philosophical theories of privacy: implications for an adequate online privacy policy. Metaphilosophy, 38, 1, 1-22.
43. Teutsch, P., Piat, F., &, Reffay, C., (2009). Anonymizing and sharing corpora of online training courses. Workshop interaction analysis and visualization for asynchronous communication (pp. 1-6).
44. The Economist. (2012, April 28). Consent 2.0. A better way of signing up for studies of your genes. The Economist. New York.
45. The White House (2012). Consumer data privacy in a networked world (p. 62). Washington: US Government, The White House.
46. Toch, E., Wang, Y., &, Cranor, L. F., (2012). Personalization and privacy: a survey of privacy risks and remedies in personalization-based systems. User Modeling and User-adapted Interaction, 22, 1-2, 203-220.
47. Verbert, K., Manouselis, N., Drachsler, H., &, Duval, E., (2012). Dataset-driven research to support learning and knowledge analytics. Educational Technology & Society, 15, 3, 133-148.
48. Voss, G., (2012). Gaming, texting, learning? Teaching engineering ethics through students' lived experiences with technology. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19, 3, 1375-1393.