Intestinal anastomoses

Surgery

Volumn 24, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 224-228

  McKinley, Aileen J ^a   Krukowski, ZH ^b  

^a Aberdeen ^*  (United Kingdom)

^b ABERDEEN ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

abdominal surgery; anastomotic technique; colorectal; end to end; hand sewn anastomoses; healing phases; side to side; stapled; sutureless

Indexed keywords

ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLORECTAL ANASTOMOSIS; END TO END ANASTOMOSIS; END TO SIDE ANASTOMOSIS; ENTEROPATHY; HEMATOMA; HUMAN; ILEOSTOMY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTESTINE ANASTOMOSIS; INTESTINE BLOOD FLOW; META ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; RISK REDUCTION; SIDE TO SIDE ANASTOMOSIS; SURGEON; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL RISK; SURGICAL STAPLING; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURGICAL TRAINING; SURGICAL WOUND; SUTURING METHOD; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT FAILURE; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 33845348904     PISSN: 02639319     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1383/surg.2006.24.7.224     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Enoch S., and Leaper D. Basic science of wound healing. Surgery 23 2 (2005) 37-42
2. Hay D. Electrosurgery. Surgery 23 2 (2005) 73-75
3. Brundage S., Jurkovich G., Hayt D., et al. Stapled versus sutured gastrointestinal anastomoses in the trauma patient: a multicenter trial. J Trauma 51 (2001) 1054-1061
4. Burch J., Franciose R., Moore E., et al. Single layer continuous versus two layer interrupted intestinal anastomosis: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 231 (2000) 832-837
5. In: Feil W., Lippert P., Lozac'H P., and Palazzini G. (Eds). Atlas of surgical stapling (2000), Barth, Heidelberg