Business Faculty's Attitudes: Open Access, Disciplinary Repositories, and Institutional Repositories

Journal of Business and Finance Librarianship

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 93-113

  Hahn, Susan E ^a   Wyatt, Anna ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

digital repositories; faculty attitudes; institutional repositories; open access

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898753651     PISSN: 08963568     EISSN: 15470644     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08963568.2014.883875     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Antelman, K. 2004. Do Open-Access articles have a greater research impact?. College & Research Libraries, 65 (5): 372 - 382.
2. Blankenship, L. and Haines, A. 2008. The institutional repository: Storing and sharing digital scholarship. Art Documentation: Bulletin of the Art Libraries Society of North America, 27 (2): 22 - 25.
3. Chaudhuri, J. and Thohira, M. 2010. Usage of Open-Access journals: Findings from eleven top science and medical journals. Serials Librarian, 58 (1/4): 97 - 105.
4. Craig, I. D., Plume, A. M., McVeigh, M. E., Pringle, J. and Amin, M. 2007. Do Open Access articles have greater citation impact? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Informetrics, 1 (3): 239 - 248.
5. Crawford, W. 2008. Open Access: It's never simple. Online, 32 (4): 58 - 60.
6. Crow, R. 2002. The case for institutional repositories: A SPARC position paper. ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues & Actions, 223: 1 - 4.
7. Directory of Open Access Journals. Retrieved from www.doaj.org
8. Eysenbach, G. 2006. Citation advantage of Open Access articles. PLoS Biology, 4 (5): 692 - 698.
9. Fischman, J. 2011. Scholars favor Open-Access journals, but some say quality and fees are concerns. Chronicle of Higher Education., Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/blogs/wiredcampus/scholars-favor-open-access-journals-but-quality-and-fees-are-concerns-for-some/29555
10. Hajjem, C., Harnad, S. and Gingras, Y. 2005. Ten-year cross-disciplinary comparison of the growth of Open Access and how it increases research citation impact. Bulletin of the IEEE Computer Society Technical Committee on Data Engineering., Retrieved from http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/261688/
11. Harnad, S. and Brody, T. 2004. Comparing the impact of Open Access (OA) vs. non-OA articles in the same journals. D-Lib Magazine, 10 (6) Retrieved from www.dlib.org/dlib/june04/harnad/06harnad.html
12. Joseph, H. 2012, February. Open Access: Delivering on the promise. Paper presented at the conference Open Conversations About Open Access, Norman, OK
13. Lercher, A. 2008. A survey of attitudes about digital repositories among faculty at Louisiana State University at Baton Rouge. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34 (5): 408 - 415.
14. Loope, D. R. and South Carolina Commission on Higher Education. 1995. Academic tenure: Its origins, administration, and importance. South Carolina Commission on Higher Education Staff Position Paper Retrieved from ERIC database (ED382149).
15. Lyons, C. and Booth, H. A. 2011. An overview of Open Access in the fields of business and management. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, 16 (2): 108 - 124.
16. Moed, H. F. 2007. The effect of 'Open Access' upon citation impact: An analysis of ArXiv's condensed matter section. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58 (13): 2047 - 2054.
17. Norris, M., Oppenheim, C. and Rowland, F. 2008. The citation advantage of Open-Access articles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59 (12): 1963 - 1972.
18. Perkel, J. 2006. Open Access brings more citations. The Scientist Magazine., Retrieved from www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/23997/title/Open-access-brings-more-citations/
19. Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from www.ssrn.com/update/general/ssrn_faq.html
20. Suber, P. 2004. Open Access overview: Focusing on Open Access to peer-reviewed research articles and their preprints Retrieved from http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm
21. Swan, A. and Brown, S. 2005. Open Access self-archiving: An author study Retrieved from http://cogprints.org/4385/
22. Taylor, M. 2011. Peers review your actions. Times Higher Education, Retrieved from www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/
23. University of California Office of Scholarly Communication and the California Digital Library eScholarship Program. 2007. Faculty attitudes and behaviors regarding scholarly communication: Survey findings from the University of California Retrieved from http://osc.universityofcalifornia.edu/responses/materials/OSC-survey-full-20070828.pdf
24. University Libraries 2014. Open Access. Retrieved from http://guides.ou.edu/openaccess
25. Xia, J. and Nakanishi, K. 2012. Self-selection and the citation advantage of Open Access articles. Online Information Review, 36 (1): 40 - 51.