Selection among renewable energy alternatives based on a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process in Indonesia

Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments

Volumn 7, Issue , 2014, Pages 34-44

  Tasri, Adek ^a   Susilawati, Anita ^b  

^a ANDALAS UNIVERSITY   (Indonesia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF RIAU   (Indonesia)

Author keywords

Fuzzy AHP; Indonesia; Renewable energy

Indexed keywords

ENERGY POLICY; FOSSIL FUELS; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; HYDROELECTRIC POWER; POLLUTION; WIND POWER;

ALTERNATIVE ENERGY SOURCE; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; FUZZY AHP; FUZZY ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; INDONESIA; RENEWABLE ENERGIES; RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCE; SELECTION CRITERIA;

GEOTHERMAL ENERGY;

ALTERNATIVE ENERGY; ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; POLLUTION EFFECT; RENEWABLE RESOURCE;

INDONESIA;

EID: 84898679385     PISSN: 22131388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2014.02.008     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. EC, World energy, technology and climate policy outlook 2030, European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Energy, 2003.
2. IEA. World energy outlook 2009 fact sheet. International Energy Agency; 2009.
3. IEA. Renewable in global energy supply: An IEA fact sheet. International Energy Agency; 2007.
4. PIE Statistik Ekonomi Energi Indonesia 2010 2010, Pusat Informasi Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral, Jakarta.
5. Rumbayan M, Nagasaka, K. Prioritization decision for renewable energy development using analytic hierarchy process and geographic information system. In: Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Advanced Mechatronic Systems, Tokyo; 2012. p. 36-41.
6. Saaty T.L. The analytics hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resources allocation 1980, McGraw-Hill International Book Co, New York.
7. Wang J.J., Jing Y.Y., Zhang C.F., Zhang X.T., Shi G.H. Integrated evaluation of distributed triple-generation systems using improved grey incidence approach. Energy 2008, 33:1427-1437.
8. Kagazyo T., Kaneko K., Akai M., Hijikata K. Methodology and evaluation of priorities for energy and environmental research projects. Energy 1997, 22:121-129.
9. Ramanathan R., Ganesh L.S. Energy alternatives for lighting in households: an evaluation using an integrated goal programming-AHP model. Energy 1995, 20:63-72.
10. Kablan M.M. Decision support for energy conservation promotion: an analytic hierarchy process approach. Energy Policy 2004, 32:1151-1158.
11. Beccali M., Cellura M., Ardente D. Decision making in energy planning: the ELECTRE multi criteria analysis approach compared to a FUZZY-SETS methodology. Energy Convers Manag 1998, 39:1869-1881.
12. Xiaohua W., Zhenmin F. Sustainable development of rural energy and its appraising system in China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2002, 6:395-404.
13. Jaber J.O., Jaber Q.M., Sawalha S.A., Mohsen M.S. Evaluation of conventional and renewable energy sources for space heating in the household sector. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2008, 12:278-289.
14. Kone A.C., Buke T. An Analytical Network Process (ANP) evaluation of alternative fuels for electricity generation in Turkey. Energy Policy 2007, 35:5220-5228.
15. van Laarhoven P.J.M., Pedrycz W. A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory. Fuzzy Set System 1983, 11:229-241.
16. Jung CH, Lee DH. A fuzzy scale for measuring weight criteria in hierarchy structure. In: Proceedings of the International Fuzzy Engineering Symposium, Yokohama, Japan; 1991.
17. Mikhailov L. Fuzzy analytical approach to partnership selection in formation of virtual enterprises. Omega 2002, 30:393-401.
18. Gungor Z., Serhadlioglu G., Kesen S.E. A fuzzy AHP approach to personnel selection problem. Appl Soft Comput 2009, 9:641-646.
19. Ansari J.A., Ashraf I., Gopal B. Integrated Fuzzy VIKOR and AHP methodology for selection of distributed electricity generation through renewable energy in India. Int J Eng Res Appl 2011, 1:1110-1113.
20. Lee S.K., Mogi G., Lee S.K., Jong W.K. Prioritizing the weights of hydrogen energy technologies in the sector of the hydrogen economy by using a fuzzy AHP approach. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2011, 36:1897-1902.
21. Zheng G., Jing Y., Huang H., Shi G., Zhang X. Developing a fuzzy analytic hierarchical process model for building energy conservation assessment. Renew Energy 2010, 35:78-87.
22. Karahman C., Kaya I. A fuzzy multicriteria methodology for selection among energy alternatives. Exp Syst Appl 2010, 37:6270-6281.
23. Choudhary D., Shankar R. An STEEP-fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for evaluation and selection of thermal power plant location: a case study from India. Energy 2012, 42:510-521.
24. Kaya T., Kahraman C. Multicriteria renewable energy planning using an integrated fuzzy VIKOR & AHP methodology: the case of Istanbul. Energy 2010, 35:2517-2527.
25. Tanino T.T. Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making. Fuzzy Set System 1984, 12:117-131.
26. Xu R.N., Zhai X.Y. Extensions of the analytic hierarchy process in fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Set System 1992, 52:251-257.
27. Hsu H.M., Chen C.T. Aggregation of fuzzy opinions under group decision making. Fuzzy Set System 1996, 79:279-285.
28. Murry J.W., Hammons J.O. Delphi: a versatile methodology for conducting qualitative research. Rev High Educ 1995, 18:423-436.
29. ESDM Hand book of energy and economic statistic of Indonesia 2012, Ministry of energy and mineral resources of Indonesia, Jakarta.
30. MEMR Statistik energi baru terbarukan 2010, Ministry of energy and mineral resources of Indonesia, Jakarta.
31. Rumbayan M., Abudureyimu A., Nagasaka K. Mapping of solar energy potential in Indonesia using artificial neural network and geographical information system. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2012, 16:1437-1449.
32. Prastowo B. Biomass resource in Indonesia: Indonesia's solid biomass energy potential. In: Proceeding of Indonesia-Germany workshop and Seminar, Bandung - Indonesia; 2012.
33. Beccali M., Cellura M., Mistretta M. Decision-making in energy planning: application of the ELECTRE method at regional level for the diffusion of renewable energy technology. Renew Energy 2003, 20:2063-2087.
34. Goletsis Y., Psarras J., Samouilidis J.E. Project ranking in the Armenian energy sector using a multi criteria method for groups. Ann Oper Res 2003, 20:135-157.
35. Kahraman C., Kaya I., Cebi S. A comparative analysis for multi attribute selection among renewable energy alternatives using fuzzy axiomatic design and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Energy 2009, 34:1603-1616.
36. Nigim K., Munier N., Green J. Pre-feasibility MCDM tools to aid communities in prioritizing local viable renewable energy sources. Renew Energy 2004, 29:1775-1791.
37. Heo E., Kim J., Boo K.J. Analysis of the assessment factors for renewable energy dissemination program evaluation using fuzzy AHP. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2010, 14:2214-2220.
38. Amer M., Daim T.U. Selection of renewable energy technologies for a developing country: a case of Pakistan. Energy Sustain Dev 2011, 15:420-435.
39. Zheng G., Zhu N., Tian Z., Chen Y., Sun B. Application of a trapezoidal fuzzy AHP method for work safety evaluation and early warning rating of hot and humid environments. Saf Sci 2012, 50:228-239.
40. Goetschel R., Voxman W. Elementary calculus. Fuzzy Set System 1986, 18:31-43.
41. Ma M., Kandel A., Friedman M. Correction to "a new approach for defuzzification". Fuzzy Set System 2002, 128:133-134.
42. Wang Y.M., Yang J.B., Xu D.L., Chin K.S. On the centroids of fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Set System 2006, 157:919-926.
43. Buckley J.J. Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Set System 1985, 17(3):233-247.
44. Fishburn P.C. Additive utilities with incomplete product set: applications to priorities and assignments 1967, Operations Research Society of America (ORSA) Publication, Baltimore, MD.
45. Shen C.Y., Lin G.T.R., Li K.P., Yuan B.J.C. An assessment of exploiting renewable energy sources with concerns of policy and technology. Energy Policy 2010, 38:4604-4616.
46. Hobbs B.J., Chankong V., Hamadeh W., Stakhiv E. Does choice of multicriteria method matter? An experiment in water resource planning. Water Resour Res 1992, 28:1767-1779.
47. Zanakis S.H., Solomon A., Wishart N., Dublish S. Multi-attribute decision making: a simulation comparison of select methods. Eur J Oper Res 1998, 107:507-529.
48. Xu E., Zhang H. Spatially-explicit sensitivity analysis for land suitability evaluation. Appl Geogr 2013, 45:1-9.
49. MEMR Blueprint pengelolaan energy nasional 2005-2025 2005, Ministry of energy and mineral resources of Indonesia, Jakarta.
50. Aiman S. Energi terbarukan: Keadaan di Indonesia dan program energi LIPI. Paper presented at Workshop Energi Terbarukan, Bandung, Indonesia; 2012.