MSDA, a proteomics software suite for in-depth Mass Spectrometry Data Analysis using grid computing

Proteomics

Volumn 14, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 1014-1019

  Carapito, Christine ^a   Burel, Alexandre ^a   Guterl, Patrick ^a   Walter, Alexandre ^a   Varrier, Fabrice ^a   Bertile, Fabrice ^a   Van Dorsselaer, Alain ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG   (France)

Author keywords

Bioinformatics; Computational proteomics; Database searching; De novo sequencing; Functional annotations; Grid computing

Indexed keywords

PEPTIDE; PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DATA ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; DATA PROCESSING; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEOMICS; CHEMISTRY; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN DATABASE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

DATABASES, PROTEIN; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PEPTIDES; PROTEINS; PROTEOMICS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84898645706     PISSN: 16159853     EISSN: 16159861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201300415     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bensimon, A., Heck, A. J., Aebersold, R., Mass spectrometry-based proteomics and network biology. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2012, 81, 379-405.
2. Aebersold, R., A stress test for mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nat. Methods 2009, 6, 411-412.
3. Hoopmann, M. R., Moritz, R. L., Current algorithmic solutions for peptide-based proteomics data generation and identification. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2013, 24, 31-38.
4. Ning, K., Fermin, D., Nesvizhskii, A. I., Computational analysis of unassigned high-quality MS/MS spectra in proteomic data sets. Proteomics 2010, 10, 2712-2718.
5. Nesvizhskii, A. I., A survey of computational methods and error rate estimation procedures for peptide and protein identification in shotgun proteomics. J. Proteomics 2010, 73, 2092-2123.
6. Balgley, B. M., Laudeman, T., Yang, L., Song, T., Lee, C. S., Comparative evaluation of tandem MS search algorithms using a target-decoy search strategy. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2007, 6, 1599-1608.
7. Shteynberg, D., Nesvizhskii, A. I., Moritz, R. L., Deutsch, E. W., Combining results of multiple search engines in proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2013, 12, 2383-2393.
8. Geer, L. Y., Markey, S. P., Kowalak, J. A., Wagner, L. et al., Open mass spectrometry search algorithm. J. Proteome Res. 2004, 3, 958-964.
9. Halligan, B. D., Geiger, J. F., Vallejos, A. K., Greene, A. S., Twigger, S. N., Low cost, scalable proteomics data analysis using Amazon's cloud computing services and open source search algorithms. J. Proteome Res. 2009, 8, 3148-3153.
10. Carapito, C., Pansanel, J., Guterl, P., Burel, A. et al., Journées scientifiques mésocentres et France Grilles (Supercalculateurs, grilles et clouds : des outils complémentaires pour la science), Paris, France, 2012.
11. Allmer, J., Algorithms for the de novo sequencing of peptides from tandem mass spectra. Expert. Rev. Proteomics 2011, 8, 645-657.
12. Pitzer, E., Masselot, A., Colinge, J., Assessing peptide de novo sequencing algorithms performance on large and diverse data sets. Proteomics 2007, 7, 3051-3054.
13. Plumel, M. I., Wasselin, T., Plot, V., Strub, J. M. et al., Mass spectrometry-based sequencing and SRM-based quantitation of two novel vitellogenin isoforms in the leatherback sea turtle (Dermochelys coriacea). J. Proteome Res. 2013, 12, 4122-4135.
14. Frank, A., Pevzner, P., PepNovo: de novo peptide sequencing via probabilistic network modeling. Anal. Chem. 2005, 77, 964-973.
15. Shevchenko, A., Sunyaev, S., Loboda, A., Bork, P. et al., Charting the proteomes of organisms with unsequenced genomes by MALDI-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry and BLAST homology searching. Anal. Chem. 2001, 73, 1917-1926.
16. Bertaccini, D., Vaca, S., Carapito, C., Arsene-Ploetze, F. et al., An improved stable isotope N-terminal labeling approach with light/heavy TMPP to automate proteogenomics data validation: dN-TOP. J. Proteome Res. 2013, 12, 3063-3070.
17. The Gene Ontology Consortium, The Gene Ontology in 2010: extensions and refinements. Nucleic. Acids. Res. 2010, 38, D331-D335.
18. Jensen, L. J., Bork, P., Ontologies in quantitative biology: a basis for comparison, integration, and discovery. PLoS Biol. 2010, 8, e1000374.
19. Rhee, S. Y., Wood, V., Dolinski, K., Draghici, S., Use and misuse of the gene ontology annotations. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2008, 9, 509-515.
20. Carbon, S., Ireland, A., Mungall, C. J., Shu, S. et al., AmiGO: online access to ontology and annotation data. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 288-289.