Building a composite score of general practitioners' intrinsic motivation: A comparison of methods

International Journal for Quality in Health Care

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 167-173

  Sicsic, Jonathan ^a   Le Vaillant, Marc ^a   Franc, Carine ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Composite indicator; Confirmatory factor analysis; General practitioners; Intrinsic motivation; Item response theory; Multiple correspondence analysis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; INTRINSIC MOTIVATION COMPOSITE SCORE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF REPORT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENT; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; JOB SATISFACTION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOLOGY; PUBLIC RELATIONS;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; ENVIRONMENT; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTITIONERS; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; JOB SATISFACTION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MOTIVATION;

EID: 84898645482     PISSN: 13534505     EISSN: 14643677     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzu007     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Ryan AM, Doran TM. The effect of improving processes of care on patient outcomes: evidence from the United Kingdom's quality and outcomes framework. Med Care 2012;50:191-9.
2. Mannion R, Davies H. Payment for performance in health care. Br Med J 2008;336:308.
3. McDonald R, Harrison S, Checkland K et al. Impact of financial incentives on clinical autonomy and internal motivation in primary care: ethnographic study. Br Med J 2007;334:1357.
4. Janus K. Managing motivation among health care professionals. Adv Health Care Manag 2010;9:47-77.
5. Deci EL. Effect of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. J Perso Social Psy 1971;18:105-15.
6. Delfgaauw J, Dur R. Signaling and screening of workers' motivation. J Econ Behav Org 2007;62:605-24.
7. Feng Y, Farrar S, Sutton M et al. The effect of an increase in the rate of payment on general practioners' intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Research paper. Office of Health Economics, 2011.
8. Deci EL, Ryan RM. The "What" and "Why" of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behaviour. Psycho Inquiry 2000;11:227-68.
9. Frey BS. Not Just for Money: An Economic Theory of Personal Motivation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 1997.
10. Nardo M, Saisana M, Saltelli A et al. Handbook on constructing composite indicators: methodology and user guide. OECD Statistics Working Paper. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), 2005.
11. Asselin LM, Vu T. Multidimensional poverty and multiple correspondence analysis. In Kakwani N, Silber J (eds). Quantitative Approaches to Multidimensional Poverty Measurement. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008;80-103.
12. Christoffersson A. Factor analysis of dichotomized variables. Psychometrika 1975;40:5-32.
13. Muthen B. Contribution to factor analysis of dichotomous variables. Psychometrika 1978;43:551-60.
14. Sébille V, Hardouin JB, Le Néel T et al. Methodological issues regarding power of classical test theory (CTT) and item response theory (IRT)-based approaches for the comparison of patientreported outcomes in two groups of patients-a simulation study. BMC Med Res Meth 2010;10:24.
15. Bartholomew DJ, Knott M. Latent Variable Models and Factor Analysis. London: Arnold, 1999.
16. Janus K, Amelung VE, Baker LC et al. Job satisfaction and motivation among physicians in academic medical centers: insights from a cross-national study. J Health Polit Policy Law 2008;33:1133-67.
17. Videau Y, Batifoulier P, Arrighi Y et al. Le cycle de vie des motivations professionnelles en médecine générale: une étude dans le champ de la prévention. Rev Epi Sante Pub 2010;58:301-11.
18. Bellamy V. Les revenus libéraux des médecins en 2007 et 2008. Etudes et Résultats, French Minis Health 2010;735:1-8.
19. Greenacre MJ. Theory and Applications of Correspondence Analysis. London: Academic Press, 1984.
20. Muthen O, du Toit SHC, Spisic D. Robust inference using weighted least squares and quadratic estimating equations in latent variable modelling with categorical and continuous outcomes. Techinical report. Los Angeles: University of California, 1997.
21. Cohen J. Weigthed kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psy Bull 1969; 70:213-20.
22. Benzécri JP. Sur le calcul des taux d'inertie dans l'analyse d'un questionnaire. Cah Anal Données 1979;4:377-8.
23. Jöreskog KG. A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika 1969;34:183-202.
24. Brodin U, Fors U, Laksov KB. The application of item response theory on a teaching strategy profile questionnaire. BMC Med Edu 2010;10:14.
25. Hays RD, Morales LS, Reise SP. Item response theory and health outcomes measurement in the 21st century. Med Care 2000;38 (9 Suppl): II28-42.