Trophic transfer potential of aluminium oxide nanoparticles using representative primary producer (Chlorella ellipsoides) and a primary consumer (Ceriodaphnia dubia)

Aquatic Toxicology

Volumn 152, Issue , 2014, Pages 74-81

  Pakrashi, Sunandan ^a   Dalai, Swayamprava ^a   Chandrasekaran, Natarajan ^a   Mukherjee, Amitava ^a  

^a VIT UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

Aluminium oxide nanoparticle; Bioaccumulation; Energy transfer; Trophic transfer

Indexed keywords

ALGA; ALUMINUM OXIDE; AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM; BIOACCUMULATION; BIOAVAILABILITY; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); DISSOLUTION; ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; HYDRODYNAMICS; PRIMARY PRODUCTION; REPRODUCTIVE BEHAVIOR;

ALUMINIUM OXIDE NANOPARTICLE; BIOACCUMULATION; ENERGY TRANSFER; TROPHIC TRANSFER;

ALUMINUM OXIDE; ANIMALS; CHLORELLA; CLADOCERA; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FOOD CHAIN; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, TRANSMISSION; NANOPARTICLES; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL;

EID: 84898644107     PISSN: 0166445X     EISSN: 18791514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2014.03.024     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Roco M.C., Bainbridge W.S. Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology: maximizing human benefit. J. Nanopart. Res. 2005, 7:1-13.
2. Future Markets Inc. The Global Market for Metal Oxide Nanoparticles to 2020 2013, 322. Future Markets Inc.
3. 2 particles. Toxicol. Sci. 2010, 115:156-166.
4. Nel A., Xia T., Mädler L., Li N. Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science 2006, 311:622-627.
5. 2 films. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128:2385-2393.
6. Vasir J.K., Reddy M.K., Labhasetwar V.D. Nanosystems in drug targeting: opportunities and challenges. Curr. Nanosci. 2005, 1:47-64.
7. Singh R., Lillard J.W. Nanoparticle-based targeted drug delivery. Exp. Mol. Pathol. 2009, 86:215-223.
8. Ganesh S., Iyer A.K., Morrissey D.V., Amiji M.M. Hyaluronic acid based self-assembling nanosystems for CD44 target mediated siRNA delivery to solid tumors. Biomaterials 2013.
9. Nazar H. Nanotechnology medicine-from gene delivery to tissue targeting. Pharm. J. 2013, 290:115.
10. Rittner M.N., Abraham T. Nanostructured materials: an overview and commercial analysis. J. Miner. Met. Mater. Soc. (JOM) 1998, 50:37-38.
11. Sawyer W.G., Freudenberg K.D., Bhimaraj P., Schadler L.S. A study on the friction and wear behavior of PTFE filled with alumina nanoparticles. Wear 2003, 254:573-580.
12. Landry V., Riedl B., Blanchet P. Alumina and zirconia acrylate nanocomposites coatings for wood flooring: photocalorimetric characterization. Prog. Org. Coat. 2008, 61:76-82.
13. Khanna A.S. Nanotechnology in high performance paint coatings. Asian J. Exp. Sci. 2008, 21:25-32.
14. DeFriend K.A., Wiesner M.R., Barron A.R. Alumina and aluminate ultrafiltration membranes derived from alumina nanoparticles. J. Membr. Sci. 2003, 224:11-28.
15. Bunker C.E., Smith M.J., Fernando K.A.S., Harruff B.A., Lewis W.K., et al. Spontaneous hydrogen generation from organic-capped Al nanoparticles and water. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2010, 2:11-14.
16. Luca L.T., Galfetti L., Severini F., Meda L., Marra G., et al. Burning of nano-aluminized composite rocket propellants. Combust., Explos. Shock Waves 2005, 41:680-692.
17. Wong K-FV, Kurma T. Transport properties of alumina nanofluids. Nanotechnology 2008, 19:345702.
18. Maynard A., Aitken R.J., Butz T., Colvin V., Donaldson K., et al. Safe handling of nanotechnology. Nature (London) 2006, 444:267.
19. 3 nanoparticles at low exposure levels to a freshwater bacterial isolate. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2011, 24:1899-1904.
20. 3) nanoparticles to microalgae species: Scenedesmus sp. and Chlorella sp. J. Nanopart. Res. 2011, 13:3287-3299.
21. Zhu X., Zhu L., Chen Y., Tian S. Acute toxicities of six manufactured nanomaterial suspensions to Daphnia magna. J. Nanopart. Res. 2009, 11:67-75.
22. Ates M., Demir V., Arslan Z., Daniels J., Farah I.O., Bogatu C. Evaluation of alpha and gamma aluminum oxide nanoparticle accumulation, toxicity, and depuration in Artemia salina larvae. Environ. Toxicol. 2013, Published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com). 10.1002/tox.21917.
23. Heckmann L.H., Hovgaard M., Sutherland D., Autrup H., Besenbacher F. Limit-test toxicity screening of selected inorganic nanoparticles to the earthworm Eisenia fetida. Ecotoxicology 2011, 20:226-233.
24. Zhu X., Zhu L., Duan Z., Qi R., Li Y. Comparative toxicity of several metal oxide nanoparticle aqueous suspensions to Zebrafish (Danio rerio) early developmental stage. J. Environ. Sci. Health A: Environ. Sci. Eng. 2008, 43:278-284.
25. Blaise C., Férard J.-F. Small-Scale Freshwater Toxicity Investigations 2005, Springer.
26. Dickman E.M., Newell J.M., González M.J., Vanni M.J. Light, nutrients, and food-chain length constrain planktonic energy transfer efficiency across multiple trophic levels. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105:18408-18412.
27. McMahon J.W., Rigler F.H. Feeding rate of Daphnia magna Straus in different foods labeled with radioactive phosphorus. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1965, 105-113.
28. Pakrashi S., Dalai S., Prathna T.C., Trivedi S., Myneni R., Chandrasekaran N., Mukherjee A. Cytotoxicity of aluminium oxide nanoparticles towards fresh water algal isolate at low exposure concentrations. Aquat. Toxicol. 2013, 132-133:34-45.
29. Pakrashi S., Dalai S., Humayun A., Chakravarty S., Chandrasekaran N., Mukherjee A. Ceriodaphnia dubia as a potential bio-indicator for assessing acute aluminum oxide nanoparticle toxicity in fresh water environment. PLoS One 2013, 8:e74003.
30. OECD 202 OECD Guideline for Testing of Chemicals. "Daphnia sp., Acute Immobilisation Test" 2004, OECD Publications, Paris, France.
31. 2 nanoparticles and their detoxification in a freshwater system. Aquat. Toxicol. 2013, 138:1-11.
32. Wright S.W., Jeffrey S.W., Mantoura R.F.C. Phytoplankton Pigments in Oceanography: Guidelines to Modern Methods 2005, Unesco Pub, France.
33. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, 1984 OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals 201. OECD Publications, Paris, France (1984).
34. 2+ on growth and chlorophyll content of alga Scenedesmus quadricauda. Sect. Cell. Mol. Biol. 1999, 54.
35. Sayes C.M., Warheit D.B. Characterization of nanomaterials for toxicity assessment. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 2009, 1:660-670.
36. Couvreur P., Puisieux F. Nano-and microparticles for the delivery of polypeptides and proteins. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 1993, 10:141-162.
37. Zeng H., Li J., Liu J.P., Wang Z.L., Sun S. Exchange-coupled nanocomposite magnets by nanoparticle self-assembly. Nature 2002, 420:395-398.
38. 2 nanoparticles from daphnia to zebrafish in a simplified freshwater food chain. Chemosphere 2010, 79:928-933.
39. Liu X.-J., Ni I., Wang W.-X. Trophic transfer of heavy metals from freshwater zooplankton Daphnia magna to zebrafish Danio reiro. Water Res. 2002, 36:4563-4569.
40. Elser J.J., Hayakawa K., Urabe J. Nutrient limitation reduces food quality for zooplankton: Daphnia response to seston phosphorus enrichment. Ecology 2001, 82:898-903.
41. Persson J., Brett M.T., Vrede T., Ravet J.L. Food quantity and quality regulation of trophic transfer between primary producers and a keystone grazer (Daphnia) in pelagic freshwater food webs. Oikos 2007, 116:1152-1163.
42. Müller-Navarra D.C., Brett M.T., Liston A.M., Goldman C.R. A highly unsaturated fatty acid predicts carbon transfer between primary producers and consumers. Nature 2000, 403:74-77.