Uncertainty in Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) deployment projections: A cross-model comparison exercise

Climatic Change

Volumn 123, Issue 3-4, 2014, Pages 461-476

  Koelbl, Barbara Sophia ^a   van den Broek, Machteld A ^a   Faaij, André P C ^a   van Vuuren, Detlef P ^a,b  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b PBL NETHERLANDS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AGENCY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE;

CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE; FUNCTION OF TIME; INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT MODELS; MITIGATION OPTIONS; MODEL ASSUMPTIONS; MODEL RESULTS; MODELING PROJECT; PRIMARY ENERGY USE;

CARBON CAPTURE;

EID: 84898540128     PISSN: 01650009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-013-1050-7     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Akimoto K, Tomoda T, Fujii Y, Yamaji K (2004) Assessment of global warming mitigation options with integrated assessment model DNE21. Energy Econ. doi: 10. 1016/j. eneco. 2004. 04. 021.
2. 2 concentration targets and the role of bio-energy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS). Clim Change. doi: 10. 1007/s10584-010-9832-7.
3. Azar C, Lindgren K, Larson E, Möllersten K (2006) Carbon capture and storage from fossil fuels and biomass-costs and potential role in stabilizing the atmosphere. Clim Change. doi: 10. 1007/s10584-005-3484-7.
4. Bachu S, et al (2007) CO2 storage capacity estimation: methodology and gaps. I Int J Greenh Gas Control.
5. Bauer NA (2006) Carbon capture and sequestration: an option to buy time? University Potsdam, Dissertation.
6. Bradshaw J, et al (2007) CO2 storage capacity estimation: issues and development of standards. Int J Greenh Gas Control.
7. de Vries BJM, van Vuuren DP, den Elzen MGJ, Janssen MA (2001) The Targets IMage Energy Regional (TIMER) model. RIVM/PBL, Bilthoven.
8. Fisher BS et al (2007) Issues related to mitigation in the long term context. In: Metz B, Davidson OR, Dave R, Meyer LA (eds) Climate change 2007: Mitigation Contribution of Working Group III to the fourth assessment report of the inter-governmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 169-250.
9. Flannery BP (2011) Comment. Energy Econ.
10. GCCSI (2013) The global status of CCS-Update January 2013. The global status of CCS-Update January 2013.
11. GEA (2012) Global energy assessment-toward a sustainable future. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Vienna, Austria and Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA.
12. Hourcade J, Jaccard M, Bataille C, Ghersi F (2006) Hybrid modeling: new answers to old challenges introduction to the special issue of the energy journal. Energy J.
13. IEA (2012) Energy technology perspectives 2012: Pathways to a clean energy system. OECD Publishing.
14. IEA GHG (2011) Potential for biomass and carbon dioxide capture and storage 2011/06.
15. IHS (2011) IHS indexes. In: http://www. ihsindexes. com/. Accessed 21 November 2011.
16. IPCC (2005) IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage. Prepared by Working Group III of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
17. Krey V, Luderer G, Clarke LE, Kriegler E (2013) Getting from here to there: energy technology transformation pathways in the EMF27 scenarios. Clim Change Accepted.
18. Kriegler E, et al (2013) The role of technology for achieving climate policy objectives: overview of the EMF 27 study on global technology and climate policy strategies. Clim Change. doi: 10. 1007/s10584-013-0953-7.
19. Kurosawa A (2004) Carbon concentration target and technological choice. Energy Econ doi: 10. 1016/j. eneco. 2004. 04. 022.
20. Löschel A (2002) Technological change in economic models of environmental policy: a survey. Ecol Econ. doi: 10. 1016/S0921-8009(02)00209-4.
21. Luderer G et al (2013) The role of renewable energy in climate mitigation: results from the EMF27 scenarios. Clim Change. doi: 10. 1007/s10584-013-0924-z.
22. Praetorius B, Schumacher K (2009) Greenhouse gas mitigation in a carbon constrained world: the role of carbon capture and storage. Energy Policy. doi: 10. 1016/j. enpol. 2009. 07. 018.
23. Riahi K et al (2004) Technological learning for carbon capture and sequestration technologies. Energy Econ. doi: 10. 1016/j. eneco. 2004. 04. 024.
24. Rose S, et al (2013) Bioenergy in energy transformation and climate management. Clim Change Accepted.
25. Smekens-Ramirez Morales KEL (2004) Response from a MARKAL technology model to the EMF scenario assumptions. Energy Econ. doi: 10. 1016/j. eneco. 2004. 04. 032.
26. EU (2009) DIRECTIVE 2009/31/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 23 April 2009 on the geological storage of carbon dioxide and amending Council Directive 85/337/EEC, European Parliament and Council Directives 2000/60/EC, 2001/80/EC, 2004/35/EC, 2006/12/EC, 2008/1/EC and Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006. Official Journal of the European Union L 140/114.
27. van Vliet OPR, Broek MAVD, Turkenburg WC, Faaij APC (2011) Combining hybrid cars and synthetic fuels with electricity generation and carbon capture and storage. Energy Policy 39: 248-268.
28. Weyant JP (2004) Introduction and overview. Energy Econ. doi: 10. 1016/j. eneco. 2004. 04. 019.