Animations in science education

Handbook of Research on Digital Information Technologies: Innovations, Methods, and Ethical Issues

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 67-81

  Karlsson, Göran ^a   Ivarsson, Jonas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898525180     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-970-0.ch006     Document Type: Chapter

References (39)

1. Barak, J., Sheva, B., & Gorodetsky, M. (1999). As 'process' as it can get: Students' understanding of biological processes. International Journal of Science Education, 21(12), 1281-1292.
2. Brown, C. R. (1990). Some misconceptions in meiosis shown by students responding to an advanced level practical examination question in biology. Journal of Biological Education, 24(3), 182-186.
3. Brown, D. E. (1992). Using examples and analogies to remediate misconceptions in physics: Factors influencing conceptual change. Journal Articles: Reports-Research, 29(1), 17-34.
4. Camp, J. J., Cameron, B. M. D. B., & Robb, R. A. (1998). Virtual reality in medicine and biology. Future Generation Computer Systems, 14, 91-108.
5. Cañal, P. (1999). Photosynthesis and 'inverse respiration' in plants: An inevitable misconception? International Journal of Science Education, 21(4), 363-371.
6. Eisen, B., & Stavy, R. (1993). How to make learning of photosynthesis more relevant. International Journal of Science Education, 15(2), 117-125.
7. Euler, M., & Müller, A. (1999). Physics learning and the computer: A review, with a taste of metaanalysis. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference of the European Science Education Research Association.
8. Flick, L., & Bell, R. (2000). Preparing tomorrow's science teachers to use technology: Guidelines for science educators. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 1, 39-60.
9. Goh, N.-K. (1993). Some misconceptions in chemistry: A cross-cultural comparison, and implications for teaching. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 39(3), 65-68.
10. Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606-633.
11. Ivarsson, J. (2003). Kids in zen: Computer-supported learning environments and illusory intersubjectivity. Education, Communication & Information, 3(3), 383-402.
12. Ivarsson, J. (2004). Renderings & reasoning: Studying artifacts in human knowing. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
13. Jones, D. G. C. (1991). Teaching modern physics: Misconceptions of the photon that can damage understanding. Physics Education, 26(2), 93-98.
14. Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Science, 4(1), 39-103.
15. Kameas, A., Mikropoulos, T. A., Katsikis, A., Emvalotis, A., & Pintelas, P. (2000). EIKON: Teaching a high-school technology course with the aid of virtual reality. Education and Information Technologies, 5, 305-315.
16. Karr, T. L., & Brady, R. (2000). Virtual biology in CAVE. Trends in Genetics, 16, 231-232.
17. Lindwall, O., & Ivarsson, J. (2004). What makes the subject matter matter? Contrasting probeware with graphs & tracks. In J. Ivarsson (Ed.), Renderings & reasoning: Studying artifacts in human knowing (pp. 115-143). Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
18. Lindwall, O., & Ivarsson, J. (in press). Differences that make a difference: Contrasting the local enactment of two technologies in a kinematics lab. In S. Ludvigsen, A. Lund, I. Rasmussen, & R. Säljö (Eds.), Learning across sites: New tools, infrastructures and practices. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
19. Lowe, R. K. (1999). Extracting information from an animation during complex visual learning. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14, 225-244.
20. Lowe, R. K. (2003). Animation and learning: Selective processing of information in dynamic graphics. Learning and Instruction, 13, 157-176.
21. Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32, 1-19.
22. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Mayer, R. E., Hegarty, M., Mayer, S., & Campbell, J. (2005). When static media promote active learning: Annotated illustrations versus narrated animations in multimedia instruction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11(4), 256-265.
24. Mikropouls, T. A., Katsikis, A., Nikolou, E., & Tsakalis, P. (2003). Virtual environments in biology teaching. Journal of Biological Education, 37, 176-181.
25. Mork, S. (2005). ICT in science education: Exploring the digital learning materials at viten.no. University of Oslo.
26. Nicoll, G. (2001). A report of undergraduates' bonding misconceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 23(7), 707-730.
27. Ochs, E., Gonzales, P., & Jacoby, S. (1996). When I come down I'm in the domain state: Grammar and graphic representation in the interpretive activity of physics. In E. Ochs & E. A. Schegloff (Eds.), Grammar and interaction (pp. 328-369). Cambridge University Press.
28. Odom, A. L. (1995). Secondary & college biology students' misconceptions about diffusion & osmosis. American Biology Teacher, 57(7), 409-415.
29. Petraglia, J. (1998a). Reality by design: The rhetoric and technology of authenticity in education. Manwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30. Petraglia, J. (1998b). The real world on a short leash: The (mis)application of constructivism to the design of educational technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 46(3), 53-65.
31. Rebetez, C., Sangin, M., Bétrancourt, M., & Dillenbourg, P. (2005). Learning from animations is enabled by collaboration. Manuscript in preparation.
32. Sanders, M. (1993). Erroneous ideas about respiration: The teacher factor. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(8), 919-934.
33. Sanger, M. J., & Greenbowe, T. J. (1999). An analysis of college chemistry textbooks as sources of misconceptions and errors in electrochemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 76(6), 853-860.
34. Schnotz, W., Böckheler, J., & Grzondziel, H. (1999). Individual and co-operativ learning with interactive animated pictures. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14, 245-265.
35. Schnotz, W., & Rasch, T. (2005). Enabling, facilitating, and inhibiting effects of animation in multimedia learning: Why reduction of cognitive load can have negative results on learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(3), 47-58.
36. Seymour, J., & Longden, B. (1991). Respiration: That's breathing isn't it? Journal of Biological Education, 25(3), 177-183.
37. Songer, C., & Mintzes, J. (1994). Understanding cellular respiration: An analysis of conceptual change in collage biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 621-637.
38. Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for collaborative knowledge building. Cambridge: MIT Press.
39. Tversky, B., Morrison, J. B., & Betrancourt, M. (2002). Animation: Can it facilitate? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57, 247-262.