Thinking about surgically shaping children

Surgically Shaping Children: Technology, Ethics, and the Pursuit of Normality

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages

  Parens, Erik ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898510274     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Editorial

References (12)

1. American Academy of Pediatrics. 1995. Informed consent, parental permission, and assent in pediatric practice. Pediatrics 95 (2):314-17.
2. Asch,A. 1989. Reproductive technology and disability. In Reproductive Laws for the 1990s, edited by S. Cohen and N. Taub, 69-124. Clifton, NJ: Humana.
3. Davis, L. J., ed. 1997. The Disability Studies Reader. New York: Routledge.
4. Dreger, A. D. 1999. Intersex in the Age of Ethics. Hagerstown, MD: University Publishing Group.
5. -. 2004. One of Us: Conjoined Twins and the Future of Normal. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6. Elliott, C. 2003. Better than Well: American Medicine Meets the American Dream. New York: W. W. Norton.
7. Frader, J., et al. 2004.Health care professionals and intersex conditions. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine 158:426-28.
8. Kramer, P. D. 1993. Listening to Prozac. New York: Viking.
9. Parens, E., ed. 1998. Enhancing Human Traits: Ethical and Social Implications.Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
10. -. 2005. Authenticity and ambivalence: Toward understanding the enhancement debate. The Hastings Center Report 35 (3):34-41.
11. Parens, E., and A. Asch, eds. 2000. Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
12. Sytsma, S. 2004. Ethical dilemmas in retrospective studies on genital surgery in the treatment of intersex infants. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (4):394-403.