Double-balloon endoscopy: An effective rescue procedure after incomplete conventional colonoscopy

European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 519-522

  Becx, Marco C ^a   Al Toma, Abdul ^a  

^a ST ANTONIUS HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

caecal intubation; colonoscopy; double balloon; endoscopy; incomplete colonoscopy; rescue; screening

Indexed keywords

ASCORBIC ACID; MACROGOL; MIDAZOLAM; PETHIDINE;

ADENOMATOUS POLYP; ADHESIVE ANGULATED SIGMOID; ADULT; AGED; ANGIODYSPLASIA; ARGON PLASMA COAGULATION; ARTICLE; CECAL FLAT HYPERPLASTIC POLYP; CECAL INTUBATION; CECUM; COLON ADENOMA; COLON CARCINOMA; COLON DISEASE; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPE; COLONOSCOPY; DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPE; DIGESTIVE TRACT INTUBATION; DIVERTICULITIS; DOUBLE BALLOON ENTEROSCOPY; ENDOSCOPIC POLYPECTOMY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LOOP FORMATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; PERITONEUM PSEUDOMYXOMA; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT INDICATION; ADENOMA; CARCINOMA; COLON; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; COLONIC POLYPS; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROGNOSIS; SURGERY; VERY ELDERLY;

ADENOMA; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARCINOMA; COLON; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; DOUBLE-BALLOON ENTEROSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84898439926     PISSN: 0954691X     EISSN: 14735687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000067     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH, Chak A, Cohen J, Deal SE, et al. ASGE/ACG Taskforce on Quality in Endoscopy. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterology 2006; 101:873-885.
2. Shah HA, Paszat LF, Saskin R, Stukel TA, Rabeneck L. Factors associated with incomplete colonoscopy: a population-based study. Gastroenterology 2007; 132:2297-2303.
3. Loffeld RJ, van der Putten AB. The completion rate of colonoscopy in normal daily practice: factors associated with failure. Digestion 2009; 80:267-270.
4. Rathgaber SW, Wick TM. Colonoscopy completion and complication rates in a community gastroenterology practice. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64:556-562.
5. Anderson JC, Gonzalez JD, Messina CR, Pollack BJ. Factors that predict incomplete colonoscopy: thinner is not always better. Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95:2784-2787.
6. Rex DK. Achieving cecal intubation in the very difficult colon. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 67:938-944.
7. Neerincx M, Terhaarsive Droste JS, Mulder CJ, Rakers M, Bartelsman JF, Loffeld RJ, et al. Colonic work-up after incomplete colonoscopy: significant new findings during follow-up. Endoscopy 2010; 42:730-735.
8. Keswani RN. Single-balloon colonoscopy versus repeat standard colonoscopy for previous incomplete colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73:507-512.
9. Rex DK, Chen SC, Overhiser AJ. Colonoscopy technique in consecutive patients referred for prior incomplete colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 5:879-883.
10. Marshall JB. Use of a pediatric colonoscope improves the success of total colonoscopy in selected adult patients. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 44: 675-678.
11. Paonessa NJ, Rosen L, Stasik JJ. Using the gastroscope for incomplete colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48:851-854.
12. Shumaker DA, Zaman A, Katon RM. Use of a variable-stiffness colonoscope allows completion of colonoscopy after failure with the standard adult colonoscope. Endoscopy 2002; 34:711-714.
13. Lichtenstein GR, Park PD, Long WB, Ginsberg GG, Kochman ML. Use of a push enteroscope improves ability to perform total colonoscopy in previously unsuccessful attempts at colonoscopy in adult patients. Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94:187-190.
14. Suzuki T, Matsushima M, Tsukune Y, Fujisawa M, Yazaki T, Uchida T, et al. Double-balloon endoscopy versus magnet-imaging enhanced colonoscopy for difficult colonoscopies, a randomized study. Endoscopy 2012; 44:38-42.
15. Kaltenbach T, Soetikno R, Friedland S. Use of a double balloon enteroscope facilitates caecal intubation after incomplete colonoscopy with a standard colonoscope. Dig Liver Dis 2006; 38:921-925.
16. May A, Nachbar L, Ell C. Push-and-pull enteroscopy using a single-balloon technique for difficult colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2006; 38:395-398.
17. Gay G, Delvaux M. Double-balloon colonoscopy after failed conventional colonoscopy: a pilot series with a new instrument. Endoscopy 2007; 39:788-792.
18. Pasha SF, Harrison ME, Das A, Corrado CM, Arnell KN, Leighton JA. Utility of double-balloon colonoscopy for completion of colon examination after incomplete colonoscopy with conventional colonoscope. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65:848-853.
19. Moreels TG, Macken EJ, Roth B, Van Outryve MJ, Pelckmans PA. Cecal intubation rate with the double-balloon endoscope after incomplete conventional colonoscopy: a study in 45 patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 25:80-83.
20. Coppola F, Gaia S, Cosimato M, Recchia S. Enteroscope without overtube for cecal intubation after an incomplete colonoscopy. Dig Liver Dis 2011; 43:475-477.
21. Hotta K, Katsuki S, Ohata K, Abe T, Endo M, Shimatani M, et al. A multicenter, prospective trial of total colonoscopy using a short doubleballoon endoscope in patients with previous incomplete colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75:813-818.
22. Teshima CW, Aktas H, Haringsma J, Kuipers EJ, Mensink PB. Singleballoon- assisted colonoscopy in patients with previously failed colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71:1319-1323.
23. Dzeletovic I, Harrison ME, Pasha SF, Crowell MD, Decker GA, Gurudu SR, et al. Comparison of single- versus double-balloon assisted-colonoscopy for colon examination after previous incomplete standard colonoscopy. Dig Dis Sci 2012; 57:2680-2686.
24. Yamamoto H, Sugano K. A new method of enteroscopy - the doubleballoon method. Can J Gastroenterol 2003; 17:273-274.
25. Rex DK, Bond JH, Winawer S, Levin TR, Burt RW, Johnson DA, et al. U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 1296-1308.
26. RIVM, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment. Protocol for the authorization and auditing of colonoscopy centers and endoscopists. National screening programme for bowel cancer. [Accessed 15 August 2013].