Double-balloon endoscopy versus magnet-imaging enhanced colonoscopy for difficult colonoscopies, a randomized study

Endoscopy

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 38-42

  Suzuki, T ^a   Matsushima, M ^a   Tsukune, Y ^a   Fujisawa, M ^a   Yazaki, T ^a   Uchida, T ^a   Gocyo, S ^a   Okita, I ^a   Shirakura, K ^a   Sasao, K ^a   Saito, T ^a   Sakamoto, I ^a   Igarashi, M ^a   Koike, J ^a   Takagi, A ^a   Mine, T ^a  

^a TOKAI UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL PRESSURE; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CECUM; COLONOSCOPY; DIGESTIVE TRACT INTUBATION; DOUBLE BALLOON ENTEROSCOPY; ENDOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETIC ENDOSCOPE IMAGING; MALE; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SEDATION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANTI-ANXIETY AGENTS; CECUM; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPES; COLONOSCOPY; DOUBLE-BALLOON ENTEROSCOPY; FEMALE; FLUNITRAZEPAM; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, INTERVENTIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN; PATIENT POSITIONING; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84455202317     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: 14388812     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1256875     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med: 1993; 329 1977 1981 (Pubitemid 24015040)
2. Marshall JB, Barthel JS. The frequency of total colonoscopy and terminal ileal intubation in the 1990s. Gastrointest Endosc: 1993; 39 518 520 (Pubitemid 23228191)
3. Dafnis G, Granath F, Pahlman L et al. The impact of endoscopists experience and learning curves and interendoscopist variation on colonoscopy completion rates. Endoscopy: 2001; 33 511 517 (Pubitemid 32618869)
4. Cirocco WC, Rusin LC. Factors that predict incomplete colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum: 1995; 38 964 968
5. Matsushima M, Suzuki T, Tokiwa K et al. Proper selection of colonoscope according to gender, age and BMI of the patient. Dig Endosc: 2006; 18 188 191 (Pubitemid 43943897)
6. Shah SG, Brooker JC, Thapar C et al. Patient pain during colonoscopy: an analysis using real-time magnetic endoscope imaging. Endoscopy: 2002; 34 435 440 (Pubitemid 34601048)
7. Suzuki T, Matsushima M, Ihara K et al. Clinical significance of the use of magnetic endoscope imaging for colonoscopy. Dig Endosc: 2004; 16 322 326 (Pubitemid 39421398)
8. Hoff G, Bretthauer M, Dahler S et al. Improvement in caecal intubation rate and pain reduction by using 3-dimentional magnetic imaging for unsedated colonoscopy: a randomized trial of patients referred for colonoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol: 2007; 42 885 889 (Pubitemid 46897619)
9. Lee YT, Hui AJ, Wong VWS et al. Improved colonoscopy success rate with a distally attached mucosectomy cap. Endoscopy: 2006; 38 739 742 (Pubitemid 44044405)
10. Yamamoto H, Sekine Y, Sato Y et al. Total enteroscopy with a nonsurgical steerable double-balloon method. Gastrointest Endosc: 2001; 53 216 220 (Pubitemid 32147608)
11. Pasha SF, Harrison E, Das A et al. Utility of double-balloon colonoscopy for completion of colon examination after incomplete colonoscopy with conventional colonoscope. Gastrointest Endosc: 2007; 65 848 853 (Pubitemid 46617519)
12. Gay G, Delvaux M. Double-balloon colonoscopy after failed conventional colonoscopy: a pilot series with a new instrument. Endoscopy: 2007; 39 788 792 (Pubitemid 47386827)
13. May A, Nachbar I, Ell C. Push-and-pull enteroscopy using a single-balloon technique for difficult colonoscopy. Endoscopy: 2006; 38 395 398
14. Moreels TG, Macken EJ, Roth B et al. Cecal intubation rate with the double-balloon endoscope after incomplete conventional colonoscopy: a study in 45 patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol: 2010; 25 80 83
15. Lee YT, Lai LH, Hui AJ et al. Efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy in comparison with regular colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol: 2009; 104 41 46
16. Shumaker DA, Zaman A, Katon RM. Use of a variable-stiffness colonoscope allows completion of colonoscopy after failure with the standard adult colonoscope. Endoscopy: 2002; 34 711 714 (Pubitemid 34965670)
17. Kozarek RA, Botoman VA, Patterson DJ. Prospective evaluation of a small caliber upper endoscope for colonoscopy after unsuccessful standard examination. Gastrointest Endosc: 1989; 35 333 335 (Pubitemid 19199710)
18. Marshall JB. Use of a pediatric colonoscope improves the success of total colonoscopy in selected adult patients. Gastrointest Endosc: 1996; 44 675 678 (Pubitemid 26428326)
19. Lichtenstein GR, Park PD, Long WB et al. Use of a push enteroscope improves ability to perform total colonoscopy in previously unsuccessful attempts at colonoscopy in adult patients. Am J Gastroenterol: 1999; 94 187 190 (Pubitemid 29063466)
20. Rex DK. Achieving cecal intubation in the very difficult colon. Gastrointest Endosc: 2008; 67 938 944 (Pubitemid 351601758)
21. Akahoshi K, Kubokawa M, Matsumoto M et al. Double-balloon endoscopy in the diagnosis and management of GI tract diseases: methodology, indications, safety, and clinical impact. World J Gastroenterol: 2006; 12 7654 7659 (Pubitemid 46040578)
22. Triantafyllou K, Tsibouris P, Kalantzis C et al. PillCam Colon capsule endoscopy does not always complement incomplete colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc: 2009; 69 572 576
23. Teshima CW, Aktas H, Haringsma J et al. Single-balloon-assisted colonoscopy in patients with previously failed colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc: 2010; 71 1319 1323