Impact of recent technology advancements on pavement life

TAC/ATC 2003 - 2003 Annual Conference and Exhibition of the Transportation Association of Canada: The Transportation Factor

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages

  Hein, David ^a   Olidis, Chris ^a   Darter, Mike ^b   Von Quintus, Harold ^b  

^a Applied Research Associates Inc   (Canada)

^b ERES Division of Applied Research Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASPHALT; ASPHALT PAVEMENTS; COST EFFECTIVENESS; DESIGN; LIFE CYCLE; MAINTENANCE; MASTIC ASPHALT; PAVEMENT OVERLAYS; TECHNOLOGY;

ECONOMIC INFRASTRUCTURE; LOWER MAINTENANCE COSTS; MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATIONS; MUNICIPAL INFRASTRUCTURE; PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGY ADVANCEMENT; ULTRA-THIN WHITETOPPING;

COSTS;

EID: 84898424487     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. Ali N., J. Chan, H. Hozayen, R. Bushman, and A.T. Bergan. 1994. Mechanistic Evaluation of Stone Matrix Asphalt Concrete Mixtures, Proceedings of the Canadian Technical Asphalt Association, pp 508-522.
2. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 1993. AASHTO Guide for the Design of Pavement Structures, AASHTO, Washington, D.C.
3. Federal Highway Administration. 1997. Concrete Pavement Rehabilitation, Guide for Load Transfer Restoration, FHWA-SA-97-103. ACPA JP001P.
4. Brown E.R., R.B. Mallick, J.E. Haddock, and J. Bukowski. 1998. Performance of Stone Matrix Asphalt (SMA) Mixtures in the United States, Proceedings of the Asphalt Paving Technologist Association, pp 426-457.
5. Federal Highway Administration, FHWA 2001, TRB Superpave Implementation and Needs Assessment, AASHTO, Technology Deployment, Washington, D.C., 2001.
6. Fung, R., et al. 2002. Multi-Year Performance review of Ultra-Thin Whitetopping in the City of Brampton, Proceedings, Transportation Association of Canada 2002 Annual Meeting, Winnipeg, Manitoba, 2002.
7. Hajek, J.J., W.A. Phang, G.A. Wrong, A. Prakash, and G.M. Stott. 1986. Pavement Condition Index (PCI) for Flexible Pavements, Report PAV-86-02, The Research and Development Branch, Ministry of Transportation of Ontario, Downsview, Ontario.
8. Hajek, J.J., T.J. Kazmierowski, and G. Musgrove. 1998. "Switching to International Roughness Index, " Transportation Research Record 1643, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
9. Hajek, J.J., K.L. Smith, S.P. Rao, and M.I. Darter. 2000. Adaptation and Verification of AASHTO Pavement Design Guide for Ontario Conditions, Draft Final Report prepared for Ministry of Transportation of Ontario, Downsview, Ontario.
10. Hein, D., et al. 1994. Design, Construction and Performance of Micro-Surfacing for Urban Pavements, Proceedings of Canadian Technical Asphalt Association Annual Conference.
11. Hein, D.K., Hajek, J.J., Smith, K.L., Darter, M.I., and Rao, S. The Benefits of New Technologies and their Impact on Life-Cycle Models. Report prepared for Ministry of Transportation of Ontario, December 2000.
12. Hixon, C.D., and Ooten, D. A. 1993. Nine Years of Microsurfacing in Oklahoma, Transportation Research Board Record 1392, Washington, D.C.
13. ISSA, 1991. Recommended Performance Guidelines for Micro-Surfacing, Report A 143 (Revised), International Slurry Surfacing Association, 1101 Connecticut Avenue, N.M., Washington, D.C. 20036-4303.
14. Kazmierowski, T.J., and Bradbury, A. 1995. Microsurfacing: Solution for Deteriorated Freeway Surfaces, Transportation Research Board Record 1473, Washington, D.C.
15. Kazmierowski, T.J., Bradbury, A., Hajek, J., and Jones, G., 1993. Effectiveness of High Performance Thin Surfacings in a Wet-Freeze Environment, Transportation Research Board Record 1392, Washington, D.C.
16. Kennepohl G.J. and J.K. Davidson. 1992. Introduction of Stone Mastic Asphalts (SMA) in Ontario, Proceedings, Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Charleston, South Carolinia, 1992, pp. 517-534.
17. Khazanovich, L., M.I. Darter, and R. Bartlett. 1997. Common Characteristics of Good and Poorly Performing PCC Pavements, Report No. FHWA-RD-97-131, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, Virginia.
18. Kuennen T. 1999. Gap-Graded Maryland Mixes Meld SMA, Superpave Designs, National Asphalt Pavement Association (NAPA), pp 12-18.
19. Mamlouk, M.S., Eacker, M., and Owusu-Antiwi, E. 2000. Dowel Retrofitting - A Viable Method for Preventive Maintenance, Transportation Research Board Paper 00-1145, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
20. Ministry of Transportation of Ontario (MTO). 1991-2002. Field Guide for the Acceptance of Hot Mix and Bridge Deck Waterproofing, MTO, Downsview, Ontario.
21. Patel, A.J., Good Mojab, C.A., Romine, A.R. 1993. Concrete Pavement Repair Manuals of Practice: Materials and Procedures Rapid Repair of Partial-Depth Spalls in Concrete Pavements, Strategic Highway Research Program, Report No. SHRP-H-349.
22. Perera, R.W., C. Byrum, and S.D. Kohn. 1998. Investigation of Development of Pavement Roughness, Report No. FHWA-RD-97-147, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia.
23. Phang, W.A. 1970. "Four Years' Experience at the Brampton Test Road, " Highway Research Record No. 311, Highway Research Board, Washington, D.C.
24. Phang, W.A. and G.M. Stott. 1981. "Pavement Condition and Performance Observations, Brampton Test Road, " Proceedings of the Asphalt Pavement Technologists, San Diego, California.
25. Pierce, L.M. 1994. Portland Cement Concrete Pavement Rehabilitation in Washington State: Case Study, Transportation Research Board Record 1449, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
26. Rao, S., H.T. Yu, and M.I. Darter. 1998. The Longevity of Diamond-Ground Pavements, Final Report prepared for the American Concrete Pavement Association, Skokie, Illinois.
27. Shilstone, J.M. 1998. Performance-Based Specifications for the Concrete Portion of Concrete Pavements.
28. SHRP. 1994. Making Pavement Maintenance More Effective, Training Supplement. Report SHRP-H-380, Strategic Highway Research Program, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
29. Smith, K.L., K.D. Smith, T.E. Hoerner, L.D. Evans, M.I. Darter, and J.H. Woodstrom. 1997. Smoothness Specifications for Pavements, Final Report prepared under National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Project 1-31, NCHRP, Washington, D.C.
30. Smith, K.D., M.J. Wade, D.G. Peshkin, L. Khazanovich, H.T. Yu, and M.I. Darter. 1998. Performance of Concrete Pavements, Volume II: Evaluation of Inservice Concrete Pavements, Report No. FHWA-RD-95-110, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, Virginia.
31. Smith, K.L., N.G. Gharaibeh, M.I. Darter, H. Von Quintus, B. Killingsworth, R. Barton, and K. Kobia. 1998. Review of Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Procedures, Final Report prepared for Ministry of Transportation of Ontario, Downsview, Ontario.
32. Weed, R.M. 1999. Practical Framework for Performance-Related Specifications. 1999 Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
33. Wegman, D., J. Weigel and A. Forsberg. 1999. Collaborative Evaluations of Low Temperature Superpave PG Asphalt Binders, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
34. Yu, H.T., L. Khazanovich, S. Rao, M.I. Darter, and H Von Quintus. 1998. Guidelines for Subsurface Drainage Based on Performance, Final Report prepared for National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Project 1-34, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
35. Zaghloul, S.M. 1996. Effect of Poor Workmanship and Lack of Smoothness Testing on Pavement Life-Cycle Costs, Transportation Research Record 1939, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.