Switching to international roughness index

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1643, 1998, Pages 116-124

  Hajek, Jerry J ^a   Kazmierowski, Thomas J ^a   Musgrove, Graham ^a  

^a Ministry of Transportation of Ontario   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASPHALT PAVEMENTS; COMPOSITE MATERIALS; CONCRETE PAVEMENTS; PORTLAND CEMENT; ROUGHNESS MEASUREMENT; STANDARDS; SURFACE ROUGHNESS; SURFACE TREATMENT; TRANSFER FUNCTIONS;

INTERNATIONAL ROUGHNESS INDEX (IRI);

PAVEMENTS;

EID: 0032208214     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/1643-15     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Hveem, F. N. Devices for Recording and Evaluating Pavement Roughness. In Highway Research Board Bulletin 264, HRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. 1960.
2. Highway Performance Monitoring System Field Manual for the Continuing Analytical and Statistical Database, Appendix J. Order M5600.1A, OMB No. 2125-0028. FHWA, U.S Department of Transportation, 1987.
3. Sayers, M. W. On the Calculation of IRI from Longitudinal Road Profile. Presented at 74th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1995.
4. Sayers, M. W., T. D., Gillespie, and W. D. Paterson. Guidelines for the Conduct and Calibration of Road Roughness Measurements. World Bank Technical Paper No. 46, The World Bank, Washington, D.C., 1986.
5. Novak, E. C. Jr., and L. E. DeFrain, Jr. Seasonal Changes in the Longitudinal Profile of Pavements Subject to Frost Action. In Transportation Research Record 1362, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1992.
6. ERES Consultants Inc. NCHRP Project 1-31 Smoothness Specifications : for Pavements. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994.
7. Janoff, M. S. NCHRP Report No, 308: Pavement Roughness and Ride-ability Field Evaluation. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1988.
8. Asnani, S., K., Ksaibati, and T. I. Al-Suleiman. Consistency of Roughness and Rut Depth Measurement Collected with 11 South Dakota Road Profilers. In Transportation Research Record 1410, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993, pp. 41-51.
9. Nair S. K., and W. R., Hudson. Serviceability Prediction From User-Based Evaluations of Pavement Ride Quality. In Transportation Research Record 1084, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1986, pp. 66-75.
10. Janoff, M. S., Nick, J. B., and Davit, P. S., NCHRP Report No. 275: Pavement Roughness and Rideability. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1985.
11. Gillespie, T. D. Everything You Always Wanted to Know About the IRI, but Were Afraid to Ask! Presented to Road Profile Users Group Meeting, 1992.
12. TRDF. A Summary of Pavement Performance Data Collection and Processing Methods Used by State DOTS. Report FHWA-RD-95-060, 1994.
13. Rogers, R. B., J. M. Wyatt, and C. B. Bertrand. A State's Concerns with the FHWA's Highway Performance Monitoring System Roughness Requirements. In Transportation Research Record 1311, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1991, pp. 7-8.
14. Hajek, J. J., T. J. Kazmierowski, and G. Musgrove. International Roughness Index as a Measure of Customer Satisfaction. Proc., 1995 Annual Meeting of the Transportation Association of Canada, Victoria, British Columbia, 1995.
15. Al-Omari, B., and M. I. Darter. "Effect of Pavement Deterioration Types on IRI and Rehabilitation. Presented at 74th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C., 1995.