Alignment of patient and primary care practice member perspectives of chronic illness care: A cross-sectional analysis

BMC Family Practice

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Noël, Polly H ^a,b   Parchman, Michael L ^c   Palmer, Ray F ^b   Romero, Raquel L ^b   Leykum, Luci K ^a,b   Lanham, Holly J ^b,d   Zeber, John E ^e,f   Bowers, Krista W ^b  

^a SOUTH TEXAS VETERANS HEALTH CARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^b Mays Cancer Center at UT Health San Antonio   (United States)

^c CENTER FOR HEALTH STUDIES   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^e VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^f SCOTT AND WHITE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Chronic care; Patient surveys; Primary care

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CHRONIC DISEASE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HEALTH STATUS INDICATOR; HUMAN; MALE; MANPOWER; MEDICAL STAFF; MIDDLE AGED; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SELF CARE; STANDARDS; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHRONIC DISEASE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MEDICAL STAFF; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; PATIENTS; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; SELF CARE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84898420877     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712296     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-15-57     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Evidence on the chronic care model in the new millennium. Coleman K, Austin BT, Brach C, Wagner EH, Health Aff 2009 28 75 85 10.1377/hlthaff.28.1.75
2. Care for chronic diseases. Wagner EH, Groves T, BMJ 2002 325 913 914 10.1136/bmj.325.7370.913 12399321 (Pubitemid 35265201)
3. Assessment of chronic illness care (ACIC): a practical tool to measure quality practice. Bonomi AE, Wagner EH, Glasgow RE, VonKorff M, Health Serv Res 2002 37 791 820 10.1111/1475-6773.00049 12132606 (Pubitemid 34976719)
4. Risk of coronary artery disease in type 2 diabetes and the delivery of care consistent with the chronic care model in primary care settings: a STARNet study. Parchman ML, Zeber JE, Romero RR, Pugh JA, Med Care 2007 45 12 1129 1134 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318148431e 18007162
5. Glucose control, self-care behaviors, and the presence of the chronic care model in primary care clinics. Parchman ML, Pugh JA, Wang CP, Romero RL, Diabetes Care 2007 30 11 2849 2854 10.2337/dc06-2516 17682121 (Pubitemid 350083131)
6. Improving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action. Wagner EH, Austin BT, Davis C, Hindmarsh M, Schaefer J, Bonomi A, Health Aff 2001 20 64 78 10.1377/hlthaff.20.6.64 (Pubitemid 33707442)
7. A randomized trial of practice facilitation to improve the delivery of chronic illness care in primary care: initial and sustained effects. Parchman ML, Noël PH, Culler SD, Lanham HJ, Leykum LK, Romero RL, Palmer RF, Implementation Sci 2013 8 93 Epub ahead of print 10.1186/1748-5908-8-93
8. Development and validation of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC). Glasgow RE, Wagner EH, Schaefer J, Mahoney LD, Reid RJ, Greene SM, Med Care 2005 43 5 436 444 10.1097/01.mlr.0000160375.47920.8c 15838407 (Pubitemid 40694603)
9. Use of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) with diabetic patients: Relationship to patient characteristics, receipt of care, and self-management. Glasgow RE, Whitesides H, Nelson CC, King DK, Diabetes Care 2005 28 11 2655 2661 10.2337/diacare.28.11.2655 16249535 (Pubitemid 43951155)
10. The patient experience and health outcomes. Manary MP, Boulding W, Staelin R, Glickman SW, N Engl J Med 2013 368 201 203 10.1056/NEJMp1211775 23268647
11. Patients' perception of hospital care in the United States. Jha AK, Orav EJ, Zheng J, Epstein AM, N Engl J Med 2008 359 1921 1931 10.1056/NEJMsa0804116 18971493
12. Relationship between patient satisfaction with inpatient care and hospital readmission within 30 days. Boulding W, Glickman SW, Manary MP, Schulman KA, Staelin R, Am J Manag Care 2011 17 41 48 21348567
13. Patient satisfaction and its relationship with clinical quality and inpatient mortality in acute myocardial infarction. Glickman SW, Boulding W, Manary M, Staelin R, Roe MT, Wolosin RJ, Ohman EM, Peterson ED, Schulman KA, Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2010 3 188 195 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.900597 20179265
14. A group randomized trial of a complexity-based organizational intervention to improve risk factors for diabetes complications in primary care. Parchman ML, Pugh JA, Culler SD, Noël PH, Arar NH, Romero RL, Palmer RF, Implementation Sci 2008 3 15 10.1186/1748-5908-3-15
15. The Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (ACIC). Version 3.5. MacColl Institute, [ http://www.improvingchroniccare.org/downloads/acic-v3.5a.pdf ]
16. Understanding practice from the ground up. Crabtree BF, Miller WL, Stage KC, J Fam Pract 2001 50 10 881 887 11674891 (Pubitemid 32952535)
17. A clinical trial of tailored office systems for preventive service delivery: The Study to Enhance Prevention by Understanding Practice (STEP-UP). Goodwin MA, Zyzanski SJ, Zronek S, Ruhe M, Weyer SM, Konrad N, Esola D, Stange KC, Am J Prev Med 2001 21 1 20 28 10.1016/S0749-3797(01)00310-5 11418253 (Pubitemid 32552002)
18. Tools, teamwork, and tenacity: An examination of family practice office system influences on preventive service delivery. Carpiano RM, Flocke SA, Frank SH, Stange KC, Prev Med 2003 36 131 140 10.1016/S0091-7435(02)00024-5 12590987 (Pubitemid 36268747)
19. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I Conceptual framework and item selection. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD, Med Care 1992 30 473 483 10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002 1593914
20. McDowell I, Measuring health: A guide to rating scales and questionnaires New York: Oxford University Press 3 2006
21. Rubin DB, Multiple imputation for nonresponse on survey New York: Wiley & Sons 1987
22. Multiple imputation of item scores in test and questionnaire data, and influence on psychometric results. Van Ginkle JR, Van der Ark LA, Sijtsma K, Multivar Behav Res 2007 42 2 387 414 10.1080/00273170701360803
23. Statistical power with group mean as the unit of analysis. Barcikowski RS, J Educ Stat 1981 6 3 267 285
24. The importance of relational coordination and reciprocal learning for chronic illness care within primary care teams. Noël PH, Lanham HJ, Palmer RF, Leykum LK, Parchman ML, Health Care Manage Rev 2013 38 1 20 28 10.1097/HMR.0b013e3182497262 22310483
25. MLwiN. Rasbash J, Charlton C, Browne WJ, Healy M, Cameron B, Version 2.02. Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol 2005
26. Linkages between clinical practices and community organizations for prevention: A literature review and environmental scan. Porterfield DS, Hinnatt LW, Kane H, Home J, McAleer K, Roussel A, Am J Prev Med 2012 42 6S2 163 S171 22704433
27. A call to action on primary care and public health integration. Koo D, Felix K, Dankwa-Mullan I, Miller T, Waalen J, Am J Prev Med 2012 42 6S2 89 S91 22704438
28. Are elements of the chronic care model associated with cardiovascular risk factor control in type 2 diabetes? Parchman M, Kaissi AA, Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2009 35 3 133 138 19326804
29. Disease-management partnership functioning, synergy and effectiveness in delivering chronic-illness care. Cramm JM, Nieboer A, Int J Qual Health Care 2012 24 3 279 285 10.1093/intqhc/mzs004 22302071
30. Care quality and implementation of the chronic care model: a quantitative study. Solberg LI, Crain AL, Speri-Hillen JM, Hroscikoski MC, Engebretson KI, O'Connor PJ, Ann Fam Med 2006 4 4 310 316 10.1370/afm.571 16868234 (Pubitemid 44198458)
31. Assessing the implementation of the chronic care model in quality improvement collaboratives. Pearson ML, Wu S, Schaefer J, Bonomi AE, Shortell SM, Mendel PJ, Marsteller JA, Louis TA, Rosen M, Keeler EB, Health Ser Res 2005 37 791 820
32. Organizational factors associated with self-management behaviors in diabetes primary care clinics. Kaissi AA, Parchman M, Diabetes Educ 2009 35 5 843 850 10.1177/0145721709342901 19783769
33. Taking the PACIC back to basics: the structure of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care. Spicer J, Budge C, Carryer J, J Eval Clin Pract 2010 18 2 307 312 20973876
34. Multidisciplinary team care arrangements in the management of patients with chronic disease in Australian general practice. Harris MF, Jayasinghe UW, Taggart JR, Christi B, Proudfoot JG, Crookes PA, Beilby JJ, Davies GP, Med J Aust 2001 194 4 236 239
35. The effects of guided care on the perceived quality of health care for multi-morbid older persons: 18-month outcomes from a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Boyd CM, Reider L, Frey K, Scharfstein D, Leff B, Wolff J, Groves C, Karm L, Wegener S, Marsteller J, Boult C, J Gen Intern Med 2010 25 3 235 242 10.1007/s11606-009-1192-5 20033622
36. Effects of self-management support on structure, process, and outcomes among vulnerable patients with diabetes: a three-arm practical clinical trial. Schillinger D, Handley M, Wang F, Hammer H, Diabetes Care 2009 32 4 559 566 10.2337/dc08-0787 19131469
37. Development and evaluation of the short version of the patient assessment of chronic illness care instrument. Gugiu PC, Coryn C, Clark R, Kuehn A, Chron Illn 2009 5 4 268 276 10.1177/1742395309348072
38. Racial/ethnic and educational-level differences in diabetes care experiences in primary care. Jackson GL, Weinberger M, Hamilton NS, Edelman D, Prim Care Diabetes 2012 2 39 44
39. National strategy for quality improvement in health care: 2012 annual progress report to congress. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, http://www.ahrq.gov/workingforquality/nqs/nqs2012annlrpt.pdf Accessed 1/31/13