Are elements of the chronic care model associated with cardiovascular risk factor control in type 2 diabetes?

Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 133-138

  Parchman, Michael ^a   Kaissi, Amer A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^b TRINITY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLYCOSYLATED HEMOGLOBIN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYPERLIPIDEMIA; HYPERTENSION; MALE; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; RISK FACTOR; SELF CARE; STANDARD;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; FEMALE; HEMOGLOBIN A, GLYCOSYLATED; HUMANS; HYPERLIPIDEMIAS; HYPERTENSION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT CARE MANAGEMENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; RISK FACTORS; SELF CARE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 62449312002     PISSN: 15537250     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s1553-7250(09)35017-5     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Buse J.B., et al.: Primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases in people with diabetes mellitus: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association and the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 30:162-172, Jan. 2007.
2. Saaddine J.B., et al.: Improvements in diabetes processes of care and intermediate outcomes: United States, 1988-2002. Ann Intern Med 144:465-474, Apr. 2006.
3. Parchman M.L., et al.: Stage of change advancement for diabetes self-management behaviors and glucose control. Diabetes Educ 29:128-134, Jan.-Feb. 2003.
4. Norris S.L., et al.: Effectiveness of self-management ttaining in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care 24:561-587, Mar. 2001.
5. S. Coster M.C., et al.: Self-monitoring in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A metaanalysis. Diabetic Med 7:755-761, Nov. 2000.
6. Harris M.I., et al.: Racial and ethnic differences in glycemic control of adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 22:403-408, Mar. 1999.
7. Krein S.L., et al.: Whom should we profile? Examining diabetes care practice variation among primary care providers, provider groups, and health care facilities. Health Serv Res 37:1159-1180, Oct. 2002.
8. Jackson G.L., et al.: Veterans Affairs primary care organizational characteristics associated with better diabetes control. Am J Manag Care 11:225-237, Apr. 2005.
9. Li R., et al.: Organizational factors affecting the adoption of diabetes care management processes in physician organizations. Diabetes Care 27:2312-2316, Oct. 2004.
10. Selim A.J., et al.: Comorbidity assessments based on patient report: Results from the Veterans Health Study. J Ambul Care Manage 27:281-295, Jul.-Sep. 2004.
11. Schneeweiss S., et al.: Performance of comorbidity scores to control for confounding in epidemiologic studies using claims data. Am J Epidemiol 154:854-864, Nov. 2001.
12. Kaissi A.A., Parchman M.: Assessing chronic illness care for diabetes in primary care clinics. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 32:318-323, Jun. 2006.
13. Parchman, M.L., et al.: Glucose control, self-care behaviors, and the presence of the Chronic Care Model in primary care clinics. Diabetes Care 30, 2849-2854, Nov. 2007.
14. Nutting P.A., et al.: Use of Chronic Care Model elements is associated with higher-quality care for diabetes. Ann Fam Med 5:14-20, Jan.-Feb. 2007.
15. Feifer C., et al.: System supports for chronic illness care and their relationship to clinical outcomes. Top Health Inf Manage 22:65-72, Aug. 2001.
16. Solberg L.I., et al.: Care quality and implementation of the Chronic Care Model: A quantitative study. Ann Fam Med 4:310-316, Jul.-Aug. 2006.
17. Institute of Medicine: Primary Care: America's Health in a New Era. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1996.
18. Vallis M., et al.: Stages of change for healthy eating in diabetes: Relation to demographic, eating-related, health care utilization, and psychosocial factors. Diabetes Care 26:1468-1474, May 2003.
19. Kirk A., et al.: Increasing physical activity in people with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 26:1186-1192, Apr. 2003.
20. Bonomi A.E., et al.: Assessment of chronic illness care (ACIC): A practical tool to measure quality improvement. Health Serv Res 37:791-820, Jun. 2002.
21. Pearson M.L., et al.: Assessing the implementation of the Chronic Care Model in quality improvement collaboratives. Health Serv Res 240:978-996, Aug. 2005.
22. American Diabetes Association: Standards of medical care in diabetes. Diabetes Care 28(suppl. 1):S1-S79, Jan. 2006.
23. Edmondson A.: Speaking up in the operating room: How team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. Journal of Management Studies 40:1419-1452, Sep. 2003.
24. Anderson R., et al.: The power of relationship for high-qualiry long-term care. 7 Nurs Care Qual 20:103-106, Sep. 2005.
25. Grumbach K., Bodenheimer T.: Can health care teams improve primary care practice? JAMA 291:1246-1251, Mar. 10, 2004.
26. Parchman M.L, et al.: Continuity of care, self-management behaviors, and glucose control in patients with Type 2 diabetes. Med Care 2:137-144, Feb. 2002.
27. Parchman M.L., Noel PH., Lee S.: Primary care attributes, health care system hassles and chronic illness. Med Care 43:1123-1129, Nov. 2005.
28. Parchman M.L., Pugh J.A., Romero R.L.: Are efforts to improve technical quality of care competing with improving clinical outcomes? The case of the elevated A1c. Paper presented at the Academy Health Annual Research Meeting, Washington, D.C., Jun. 10, 2008.
29. Grant R.W., et al.:. Clinical inertia in the management of Type 2 diabetes metabolic risk factors. Diabet Med 21:150-155, Feb. 2004.
30. Kaissi A.A., Parchman M.L.: Organizational factors associated with self- management behaviors in diabetes primary care clinics. Unpublished manuscript. 2008.
31. Greatbatch D., et al.: Interpersonal communication and human-computer interaction: An examination of the use of computers in medical consultations. Interacting with Computers 5(2): 193-216, 1993.
32. Boothe N., et al.: Identifying successful communication skills in computer use in the consultation-the information in the consulting room project (iiCR). PHCSG Annual Conference Proceedings 90, 2001.
33. Schutt M., et al.: Is the frequency of self-monitoring of blood glucose related to long-term metabolic control? Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 114:384-388, Jul. 2006.
34. Martin S., et al.: Self-monitoring of blood glucose and long-term outcome: An epidemiological cohort study. Diabetologia A9:271-278, May 2006.
35. Parchman M.L., et al.: A group randomized trial of a complexity-based organizational intervention to improve risk factors for diabetes complications in primary care settings: Study protocol. Implement Science 3:15, Mar. 2008.