Automatic detection of arterial input function in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI based on affinity propagation clustering

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 1327-1337

  Shi, Lin ^a,b   Wang, Defeng ^a   Liu, Wen ^a   Fang, Kui ^b   Wang, Yi Xiang J ^a   Huang, Wenhua ^c   King, Ann D ^a   Heng, Pheng Ann ^a,b   Ahuja, Anil T ^a  

^a CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b SHENZHEN INSTITUTES OF ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^c SOUTHERN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

affinity propagation clustering; arterial input function; dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging; K means clustering

Indexed keywords

GADOTERIC ACID; GADOLINIUM 1,4,7,10-TETRAAZACYCLODODECANE-N,N',N'',N'''-TETRAACETATE; HETEROCYCLIC COMPOUND; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUND;

ACCURACY; AFFINITY PROPAGATION CLUSTERING; ARTERIAL INPUT FUNCTION; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; COST; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; KIDNEY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; VALIDITY; WHOLE BODY MRI; WHOLE BODY SCANNER; ALGORITHM; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; ANIMAL; ARTERY; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; KIDNEY CIRCULATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VASCULARIZATION;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; ARTERIES; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HETEROCYCLIC COMPOUNDS; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; KIDNEY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; RATS; RENAL CIRCULATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84898411739     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24259     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Yankeelov TE, Luci JJ, Lepage M, et al. Quantitative pharmacokinetic analysis of DCE-MRI data without an arterial input function: a reference region model. Magn Reson Imaging 2005; 23: 519-529.
2. Li X, Welch EB, Arlinghaus LR, et al. A novel AIF tracking method and a comparison of DCE-MRI parameters using individual and population based on AIFs in human breast cancer. Phys Med Biol 2011; 56: 5753-5769.
3. Carroll T J, Rowley HA, Haughton VM,. Automatic calculation of the arterial input function for cerebral perfusion image with MR imaging. Radiology 2003; 227: 593-600.
4. Peruzzo D, Bertoldo A, Zanderigo F, Cobelli C,. Automatic selection of arterial input function on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2011; 104: e148-e157.
5. Lin YC, Chan TH, Chi CY, et al. Blind estimation of the arterial input function in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using purity maximization. Magn Reson Med 2012; 68: 1439-1449.
6. Singh A, Rathore RKS, Haris M,. Improved bolus arrival time and arterial input function estimation for tracer kinetic analysis in DCE-MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009; 29: 166-176.
7. Fluckiger JU, Schabel MC, Dibella EV,. Model-based blind estimation of kinetic parameters in dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)-MRI. Magn Reson Med 2009; 62: 1477-1486.
8. Lin YC, Chan TH, Chi CY, Ng SH, Liu HL, Wei KC, Wai YY, Wang CC, Wang JJ,. Blind estimation of the arterial input function in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using purity maximization. Magn Reson Med 2012; 68: 1439-1449.
9. Mouridsen K, Christensen S, Gyldensted L, Ostergaard L,. Automatic selection of arterial input function using cluster analysis. Magn Reson Med 2006; 55: 524-531.
10. Parker GJM, Roberts C, Macdonald A, et al. Experimentally-derived functional form for a population-averaged high-temporal-resolution arterial input function for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Med 2006; 56: 993-1000.
11. Murase K, Kikuchi K, Miki H, Shimizu T, Ikezoe J,. Determination of arterial input function using fuzzy clustering for quantification of cerebral blood flow with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 13: 797-806.
12. Murase K, Kikuchi K, Miki H, Ikezoe J,. Determination of arterial input function for quantification of cerebral blood flow with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging using fuzzy clustering. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Chicago; 2000, p 2153-2156.
13. Rempp KA, Brix G, Wenz F, Becker CR, Gückel F, Lorenz WJ,. Quantification of regional cerebral blood flow and volume with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1994; 193: 637-641.
14. Schabel MC, Fluckiger JU, DiBella EV,. A model-constrained Monte Carlo method for blind arterial input function estimation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: I. Simulations. Phys Med Biol 2010; 55: 4783-4806.
15. Bokacheva L, Rusinek H, Chen Q, et al. Quantitative determination of Gd-DTPA concentration in T1-weighted MR renography studies. Magn Reson Med 2007; 57: 1012-1018.
16. Yuan J, Chow SK, Zhang Q, Yeung DK, Ahuja AT, King AD,. The use of dynamic tracer concentration in veins for quantitative DCE-MRI kinetic analysis in head and neck. PloS One 2013; 8: e59885.
17. Frey BJ, Dueck D,. Clustering by passing messages between data points. Science 2007; 315: 972-976.
18. Yang C, Bruzzone L, Sun FY, Lu LJ, Guan RC, Liang YC,. A fuzzy-statistics-based affinity propagation technique for clustering in multispectral images. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sensing 2010; 48: 2647-2659.
19. Zhang J, Tuo X, Yuan Z, Liao W, Chen H,. Analysis of FMRI data using an integrated principal component analysis and supervised affinity propagation clustering approach. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2011; 58: 3184-3196.
20. Wang K, Zhang J, Li D, Zhang X, Guo T,. Adaptive affinity propagation clustering. Acta Automatica Sinica 2007; 33: 1242-1246.
21. Wang K, Zheng J,. Fast algorithm of affinity propagation clustering under given number of clusters. Comput Syst Appl 2010; 7: 207-209.
22. Blake CL, Merz CJ,. "UCI repository of machine learning database". Department of Information and Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 1998 [Online]. Available at: http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/. (Accessed Month day, year).
23. Alon U, Barkai N, Notterman DA, et al. Broad patterns of gene expression revealed by clustering analysis of tumor and normal colon tissues probed by oligonucleotide arrays. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999; 96: 6745-6750.
24. Strehl A,. Relationship-based clustering and cluster ensembles for high-dimensional data mining [Ph.D. dissertation], The University of Texas at Austin, 2002.
25. Dembele D, Kastner P,. Fuzzy C-means method for clustering microarray data. Bioinformatics 2003; 19: 973-980.
26. Yang KC, Hung CJ, Yu CH, Wang JS,. Robust affinity propagation using preference estimation. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computer Graphics, Visualization and Computer Vision, Pilsen, 2012. p 1-4.