Novel application of simultaneous multi-image display during complex robotic abdominal procedures

BMC Surgery

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Woo, Yanghee ^a   Choi, Gi Hong ^b   Min, Byung Soh ^b   Hyung, Woo Jin ^b  

^a Department of Surgery College of Physicians and Surgeons Columbia University ^*  (United States)

^b Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Intraoperative endoscopy; Minimally invasive surgery; Multi image display; Robotic surgery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; COLON RESECTION; COMPUTER INTERFACE; DIGESTIVE TRACT ENDOSCOPY; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; FEMALE; GASTRECTOMY; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPY; LIVER RESECTION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; ROBOTICS;

ADULT; AGED; COLECTOMY; ENDOSCOPY, DIGESTIVE SYSTEM; FEMALE; GASTRECTOMY; HEPATECTOMY; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ROBOTICS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VIDEO-ASSISTED SURGERY;

EID: 84898407522     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712482     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2482-14-13     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Robotics in urological surgery: review of current status and maneuverability, and comparison of robot-assisted and traditional laparoscopy. Singh I, Comput Aided Surg 2011 16 1 38 45 10.3109/10929088.2010.541620 21198426
2. Randomized clinical study to compare the accuracy of navigated and non-navigated thoracic pedicle screws in deformity correction surgeries. Rajasekaran S, Vidyadhara S, Ramesh P, Shetty AP, Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007 32 2 56 E64 10.1097/01.brs.0000252094.64857.ab 17224800 (Pubitemid 46105794)
3. Computer-assisted surgery versus manual total knee arthroplasty: a case-controlled study. Stulberg SD, Yaffe MA, Koo SS, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006 88 Suppl 4 47 54 (Pubitemid 44901973)
4. A comparison of two techniques in image-guided thoracic pedicle screw placement: a retrospective study of 37 patients and 277 pedicle screws. Lekovic GP, Potts EA, Karahalios DG, Hall G, J Neurosurg Spine 2007 7 4 393 398 10.3171/SPI-07/10/393 17933312 (Pubitemid 47584614)
5. Robotics and general surgery. Jacob BP, Gagner M, Surg Clin North Am 2003 83 6 1405 1419 10.1016/S0039-6109(03)00159-2 14712875 (Pubitemid 37543106)
6. A case-control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy. Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L, Shafer A, Ridgway M, Skinner EN, Fowler WC, Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008 199 4 357 e351-357 18928973
7. Minimally invasive robotic mitral valve surgery. Atluri P, Woo YJ, Expert Rev Med Devices 2011 8 1 115 120 10.1586/erd.10.66 21158546
8. Robotic gastrectomy as an oncologically sound alternative to Laparoscopic resections for the treatment of early-stage gastric cancers. Woo Y, Hyung WJ, Pak KH, Inaba K, Obama K, Choi SH, Noh SH, Arch Surg 2011 146 9 1086 1092 10.1001/archsurg.2011.114 21576595
9. Role of robotic gastrectomy using da Vinci system compared with laparoscopic gastrectomy: initial experience of 20 consecutive cases. Song J, Kang WH, Oh SJ, Hyung WJ, Choi SH, Noh SH, Surg Endosc 2009 23 6 1204 1211 10.1007/s00464-009-0351-4 19263147
10. Robotic distal pancreatectomy and nephrectomy for living donor pancreas-kidney transplantation. Horgan S, Galvani C, Gorodner V, Bareato U, Panaro F, Oberholzer J, Benedetti E, Transplantation 2007 84 7 934 936 10.1097/01.tp.0000284585.12633.06 17984850 (Pubitemid 351338958)
11. Robotic liver surgery: results for 70 resections. Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Sbrana F, Addeo P, Bianco FM, Buchs NC, Annechiarico M, Benedetti E, Surgery 2011 149 1 29 39 10.1016/j.surg.2010.04.002 20570305
12. A comparison of open and robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal adenocarcinoma. de Souza AL, Prasad LM, Ricci J, Park JJ, Marecik SJ, Zimmern A, Blumetti J, Abcarian H, Dis Colon Rectum 2011 54 3 275 282 10.1007/DCR. 0b013e3182060152 21304296
13. Robot-assisted gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: lessons learned from an initial 100 consecutive procedures. Song J, Oh SJ, Kang WH, Hyung WJ, Choi SH, Noh SH, Ann Surg 2009 249 6 927 932 10.1097/01.sla. 0000351688.64999.73 19474671
14. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer: case-matched analysis of short-term outcomes. Park JS, Choi GS, Lim KH, Jang YS, Jun SH, Ann Surg Oncol 2010 17 12 3195 3202 10.1245/s10434-010-1162-5 20589436
15. A case of robot-assisted excision of choledochal cyst, hepaticojejunostomy, and extracorporeal Roux-en-y anastomosis using the da Vinci surgical system. Kang CM, Chi HS, Kim JY, Choi GH, Kim KS, Choi JS, Lee WJ, Kim BR, Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2007 17 6 538 541 10.1097/SLE. 0b013e318150e57a 18097318
16. Robotic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a cohort study. Chan OC, Tang CN, Lai EC, Yang GP, Li MK, J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2011 18 4 471 480 10.1007/s00534-011-0389-2 21487754
17. Totally robotic surgery for rectal cancer: from splenic flexure to pelvic floor in one setup. Park YA, Kim JM, Kim SA, Min BS, Kim NK, Sohn SK, Lee KY, Surg Endosc 2010 24 3 715 720 10.1007/s00464-009-0656-3 19688388
18. Minimizing hepatic trauma with a novel liver retraction method: a simple liver suspension using gauze suture. Woo Y, Hyung WJ, Kim HI, Obama K, Son T, Noh SH, Surg Endosc 2011 25 12 3939 3945 10.1007/s00464-011-1788-9 21656069
19. Early experiences of robotic-assisted laparoscopic liver resection. Choi SB, Park JS, Kim JK, Hyung WJ, Kim KS, Yoon DS, Lee WJ, Kim BR, Yonsei Med J 2008 49 4 632 638 10.3349/ymj.2008.49.4.632 18729307
20. Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring. Review of early clinical results. Ballantyne GH, Surg Endosc 2002 16 10 1389 1402 10.1007/s00464-001-8283-7 12140630
21. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: advances since 2005. Su LM, Curr Opin Urol 2010 20 2 130 135 10.1097/MOU.0b013e328336257a 20042978
22. Robotics and gynecologic oncology: review of the literature. Cho JE, Nezhat FR, J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2009 16 6 669 681 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.06.024 19896593
23. Evaluating the learning curve for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy. Pruthi RS, Smith A, Wallen EM, J Endourol 2008 22 11 2469 2474 10.1089/end.2008.0320 19046088
24. Advances in medical robotic systems with specific applications in surgery-a review. Najarian S, Fallahnezhad M, Afshari E, J Med Eng Technol 2011 35 1 19 33 10.3109/03091902.2010.535593 21142589
25. Efficacy of the Da Vinci surgical system in abdominal surgery compared with that of laparoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Maeso S, Reza M, Mayol JA, Blasco JA, Guerra M, Andradas E, Plana MN, Ann Surg 2010 252 2 254 262 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181e6239e 20622659
26. Meta-analysis of observational studies on the safety and effectiveness of robotic gynaecological surgery. Reza M, Maeso S, Blasco JA, Andradas E, Br J Surg 2010 97 12 1772 1783 10.1002/bjs.7269 20949554
27. Robotic distal pancreatectomy: cost effective? Waters JA, Canal DF, Wiebke EA, Dumas RP, Beane JD, Aguilar-Saavedra JR, Ball CG, House MG, Zyromski NJ, Nakeeb A, Pitt HA, Lillemoe KD, Schmidt CM, Surgery 2010 148 4 814 823 10.1016/j.surg.2010.07.027 20797748
28. A prospective analysis of 211 robotic-assisted surgical procedures. Talamini MA, Chapman S, Horgan S, Melvin WS, Surg Endosc 2003 17 10 1521 1524 10.1007/s00464-002-8853-3 12915974 (Pubitemid 37467611)
29. Maximizing console surgeon independence during robot-assisted renal surgery by using the Fourth Arm and TilePro. Rogers CG, Laungani R, Bhandari A, Krane LS, Eun D, Patel MN, Boris R, Shrivastava A, Menon M, J Endourol 2009 23 1 115 121 10.1089/end.2008.0416 19178173
30. Novel dynamic information integration during da Vinci robotic partial nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy. Bhayani SB, Snow DC, J Robot Surg 2008 2 2 67 69 10.1007/s11701-008-0083-9