E2ML: A tool for sketching instructional designs

Handbook of Visual Languages for Instructional Design: Theories and Practices

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 112-132

  Botturi, Luca ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LUGANO   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898368820     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-729-4.ch007     Document Type: Chapter

References (18)

1. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing. A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
2. Bates, T. W. (1999). Managing technological change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3. Belfer, K., & Botturi, L. (2003). Pedagogical patterns for online learning. Proceedings of the World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare and Higher Education ELEARN, Phoenix, Arizona, (pp.881-884).
4. Belfer, K., & Botturi, L. (2004). Online learning design with pedagogical patterns. Paper presented at the SALT Orlando Conference 2004, Orlando, Florida, USA.
5. Bolchini, D., & Paolini, P. (2006). Interactive dialogue model: A design technique for multichannel applications. IEEE Transactions on Moltumedia, 8(3), 529-542.
6. th, 2007 from http://www.rero.ch
7. Botturi, L. (2004). Visualizing learning goals with the quail model. Australasian Journal of Educational Technologies-AJET, 20(2), 248-273.
8. 2ML. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 16(4), 329-351
9. 2ML. A visual language for the design of instruction. Educational Technologies Research & Development, 54(3), 265-293.
10. Botturi, L. (2006 b). Design models as emergent features: An empirical study in communication and shared mental models in instructional design. Canadian Journal of Learning Technologies, 31(2), 119-148.
11. Botturi, L., Derntl, M., Boot, E., & Figl, K. (2006). A classification framework for educational modeling languages in instructional design. Proceedings of IEEE ICALT 2006, Kerkrade, the Netherlands, (pp. 1216-1220).
12. De Vries, F. (n.d.). EML 1.0. Retrieved on October 4, 2006 from http://dspace.learningnetworks.org/handle/1820/81
13. Derntl, M., & Botturi, L. (2006). Essential use cases for pedagogical patterns. Computer Science Education, 16(2) 137-156 [special issue on pedagogical patterns].
14. Gibbons, A. S. (2003). What and how designers design? A theory of design structure. TechTrends, 47(5), 22-27.
15. nd ed., pp. 315-343). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
16. IMS (n.d.). Learning design specification. Retrieved online on October 4, 2006, from http://www.imsproject.org/learningdesign/index.html
17. Merrill, M.D. (1983). Component display theory. In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-Design Theories and Models: An Overview of Their Current Status (vol. 1, pp. 279-333). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. Szabo, M. (2002). Competencies for educators. In H. H. Adelsberger, B. Collis, & J. M. Pawlowsky (Eds.), Handbook on information technologies for education and training (pp. 381-397). Berlin, Germany: Springer.