Meta-modeling for situational analysis and design methods

Handbook of Research on Modern Systems Analysis and Design Technologies and Applications

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 35-54

  van de Weerd, Inge ^a   Brinkkemper, Sjaak ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898283056     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-887-1.ch003     Document Type: Chapter

References (17)

1. Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J., & Jacobson, I. (1999). The unified modeling language user guide. Redwood City, CA: Addison Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.
2. Brinkkemper, S. (1996). Method engineering: engineering of information systems development methods and tools. Information and Software Technology, 38(4), 275-280.
3. Brinkkemper, S., Saeki, M., & Harmsen, F. (1999). Meta-modelling based assembly techniques for situational method engineering. Information Systems, 24(3), 209-228.
4. Coleman, F., Hayes, F., & Bear, S. (1992). Introducing objectcharts or how to use statecharts on object-oriented design. IEEE Trans Software Engineering, 18(1), 9-18.
5. Firesmith, D., Henderson-Sellers, B. H., Graham, I., & Page-Jones, M. (1998). Open modeling language (OML)-reference manual. SIGS reference library series. Cambridge, etc.: Cambridge University Press.
6. Harmsen, F., Brinkkemper, S., & Oei, J. L. H. (1994). Situational method engineering for informational system project approaches. In Proceedings of the IFIP WG8.1 Working Conference on Methods and Associated Tools for the IS Life Cycle (pp. 169-194).
7. Jacobson, I., Booch, G., & Rumbaugh, J. (1999). The unified software development process. Redwood City, CA: Addison Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.
8. Karlsson, F. (2002). Bridging the gap between method for method configuration and situational method engineering. Skövde, Sweden: Promote IT.
9. Natt och Dag, J., Regnell, B., Gervasi, V., & Brinkkemper, S. (2005). A linguistic-engineering approach to large-scale requirements management. IEEE Software, 22(1), 32-29.
10. Object Management Group. (2004). UML 2.0 superstructure specification (Technical Report ptc/04-10-02).
11. Ralyté, J., Deneckère, R., & Rolland, C. (2003). Towards a generic model for situational method engineering. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2681, 95.
12. Rolland, C., Prakash, N., & Benjamen, A. (1999). A multi-model view of process modelling. Requirements Engineering, 4(4), 169-187.
13. Saeki, M. (2003). Embedding metrics into information systems development methods: an application of method engineering technique. In Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (pp. 374-389).
14. Weerd, I. van de, Brinkkemper, S., Souer, J., & Versendaal, J. (2006). A situational implementation method for Web-based content management system-applications: Method engineering and validation in practice [Accepted for a special issue]. Software Process: Improvement and Practice.
15. Weerd, I. van de, Brinkkemper, S., & Versendaal, J. (2006). Incremental method evolution in requirements management: A case study at Baan 1994-2006 (Technical report UU-CS-2006-057). Institute of Computing and Information Sciences, Utrecht University.
16. Weerd, I. van de, Brinkkemper, S., & Versendaal, J. (2007). Concepts for incremental method evolution: Empirical exploration and validation in requirements management. 19th Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering. Trondheim, Norway.
17. Weerd, I. van de, Versendaal, J., & Brinkkemper, S. (2006, June 5-6). A product software knowledge infrastructure for situational capability maturation: Vision and case studies in product management. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Working Conference on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality (REFSQ'06). Luxembourg: Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg.