Intention-based decision making via intention recognition and its applications

Human Behavior Recognition Technologies: Intelligent Applications for Monitoring and Security

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 174-211

  Han, The Anh ^a   Pereira, Luis Moniz ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDADE NOVA DE LISBOA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898177937     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-3682-8.ch009     Document Type: Chapter

References (97)

1. Alferes, J. J., Pereira, L. M., & Swift, T. (2004). Abduction in well-founded semantics and generalized stable models via tabled dual programs. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 4(4), 383-428. doi:10.1017/S1471068403001960
2. Armentano, M. G., & Amandi, A. (2007). Plan recognition for interface agents. Artificial Intelligence Review, 28(2), 131-162. doi:10.1007/s10462-009-9095-8
3. Armentano, M. G., & Amandi, A. (2009). Goal recognition with variable-order Markov models. In Proceedings of the 21st International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. IEEE.
4. Baral, C. (2003). Knowledge representation, reasoning, and declarative problem solving. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511543357
5. Baral, C., Gelfond, M., & Rushton, N. (2009). Probabilistic reasoning with answer sets. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 9(1), 57-144. doi:10.1017/S1471068408003645
6. Binmore, K. G. (2009). Rational decisions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7. Blaylock, N., & Allen, J. (2003). Corpus-based, statistical goal recognition. In Proceedings of the 18th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2003). IEEE.
8. Bratman, M. E. (1987). Intention, plans, and practical reason. CSLI.
9. Bratman, M. E. (1999). Faces of intention: Selected essays on intention and agency. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511625190
10. Burglar Alarm. (2012). Wikipedia. Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burglar_alarm
11. Burmeister, B., Arnold, M., Copaciu, F., & Rimassa, G. (2008). BDI-agents for agile goaloriented business processes. In Proceedings of the 7th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: Industrial Track. IEEE.
12. Castro, L., Swift, T., & Warren, D. S. (2007). XASP: Answer set programming with xsb and smodels. Retrieved from http://xsb.sourceforge.net/packages/xasp.pdf
13. Cesta, A., & Pecora, F. (2004). The robocare project: Intelligent systems for elder care. Paper presented at the AAAI Fall Symposium on Caring Machines: AI in Elder Care. New York, NY.
14. Charniak, E., & Goldman, R. P. (1990). Plan recognition in stories and in life. In Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. IEEE.
15. Cheney, D. L., & Seyfarth, R. M. (2007). Baboon metaphysics: The evolution of a social mind. Chicago, IL: University Of Chicago Press.
16. Cohen, P. R., & Levesque, H. J. (1990). Intention is choice with commitment. Artificial Intelligence, 42(2-3), 213-261. doi:10.1016/0004-3702(90)90055-5
17. Cook, D., Augusto, J., & Jakkula, V. (2009). Ambient intelligence: Technologies, applications, and opportunities. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 5(4), 277-298. doi:10.1016/j.pmcj.2009.04.001
18. Falk, A., Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2008). Testing theories of fairness---Intentions matter. Games and Economic Behavior, 62(1), 287-303. doi:10.1016/j.geb.2007.06.001
19. Frank, R. H., Gilovich, T., & Regan, D. T. (1993). The evolution of one-shot cooperation: An experiment. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14(4), 247-256. doi:10.1016/0162-3095(93)90020-I
20. Friedewald, M., Costa, O. D., Punie, Y., Alahuhta, P., & Heinonen, S. (2005). Perspectives of ambient intelligence in the home environment. Telematics Information, 22.
21. Friedewald, M., Vildjiounaite, E., Punie, Y., & Wright, D. (2007). Privacy, identity and security in ambient intelligence: A scenario analysis. Telematics and Informatics, 24(1), 15-29. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2005.12.005
22. Geib, C. W. (2002). Problems with intent recognition for elder care. In Proceedings of AAAI Workshop Automation as Caregiver. AAAI.
23. Gelfond, M., & Lifschitz, V. (1993). Representing actions and change by logic programs. Journal of Logic Programming, 17(2,3,4), 301 - 323.
24. Giuliani, M. V., Scopelliti, M., & Fornara, F. (2005). Elderly people at home: technological help in everyday activities. Paper presented at the IEEE International Workshop on In Robot and Human Interactive Communication. New York, NY.
25. Haigh, K., Kiff, L., Myers, J., Guralnik, V., Geib, C., Phelps, J., et al. (2004). The independent lifestyle assistant (I.L.S.A.): AI lessons learned. In Proceedings of Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence. IEEE.
26. Han, T. A. (2009). Evolution prospection with intention recognition via computational logic. Dresden, Germany: Technical University of Dresden.
27. Han, T. A. (2012). Intention recognition, commitments and their roles in the evolution of cooperation. Lisbon, Portugal: Universidade Nova de Lisboa.
28. Han, T. A., Carroline, D. P., & Damasio, C. V. (2008). An implementation of extended p-log using XASP. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Logic Programming. IEEE.
29. Han, T. A., Carroline, D. P., & Damasio, C. V. (2009). Tabling for p-log probabilistic query evaluation. Paper presented at the New Trends in Artificial Intelligence, Proceedings of 14th Portuguese Conference on Artificial Intelligence (EPIA 2009). Evora, Portugal.
30. Han, T. A., & Pereira, L. M. (2010a). Collective intention recognition and elder care. Paper presented at the AAAI 2010 Fall Symposium on Proactive Assistant Agents (PAA 2010). New York, NY.
31. Han, T. A., & Pereira, L. M. (2010b). Proactive intention recognition for home ambient intelligence. In Proceedings of 5th Workshop on Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Ambient Intelligence (AITAmI'10), Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments. IEEE.
32. Han, T. A., & Pereira, L. M. (2011a). Context-dependent incremental intention recognition through Bayesian network model construction. In Proceedings of the Eighth UAI Bayesian Modeling Applications Workshop (UAI-AW 2011). UAI-AW.
33. Han, T. A., & Pereira, L. M. (2011b). Intentionbased decision making with evolution prospection. In Proceedings of the 15th Portugese Conference on Progress in Artificial Intelligence. IEEE.
34. Han, T. A., Pereira, L. M., & Santos, F. C. (2011a). Intention recognition promotes the emergence of cooperation. Adaptive Behavior, 19(3), 264-279.
35. Han, T. A., Pereira, L. M., & Santos, F. C. (2011b). The role of intention recognition in the evolution of cooperative behavior. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI'2011). IEEE.
36. Han, T. A., Pereira, L. M., & Santos, F. C. (2012a). Corpus-based intention recognition in cooperation dilemmas. Artificial Life. doi:10.1162/ARTL_a_00072
37. Han, T. A., Pereira, L. M., & Santos, F. C. (2012b, June). Intention recognition, commitment and the evoution of cooperation. Paper presented at the The 2012 IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence (IEEE WCCI 2012), Congress on Evolutionary Computation (IEEE CEC 2012). Brisbane, Australia.
38. Han, T. A., Saptawijaya, A., & Pereira, L. M. (2012). Moral reasoning under uncertainty. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence and Reasoning (LPAR-18). LPAR.
39. Hauser, M. D. (2007). Moral minds, how nature designed our universal sense of right and wrong. New York, NY: Little Brown.
40. Heinze, C. (2003). Modeling intention recognition for intelligent agent systems.
41. Hofbauer, J., & Sigmund, K. (1998). Evolutionary games and population dynamics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139173179
42. Hong, J. (2001). Goal recognition through goal graph analysis. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 15, 1-30. doi:10.1023/A:1006673610113
43. Janssen, M. A. (2008). Evolution of cooperation in a one-shot prisoner's dilemma based on recognition of trustworthy and untrustworthy agents. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 65(3-4), 458-471. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2006.02.004
44. Kakas, A. C., Kowalski, R. A., & Toni, F. (1993). Abductive logic programming. Journal of Logic and Computation, 2(6), 719-770. doi:10.1093/logcom/2.6.719
45. Kaminka, G. A., Tambe, D. V. P. M., Pynadath, D. V., & Tambe, M. (2002). Monitoring teams by overhearing: A multi-agent plan-recognition approach. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 17.
46. Kraus, S. (1997). Negotiation and cooperation in multi-agent environments. Artificial Intelligence, 94(1-2), 79-98. doi:10.1016/S0004-3702(97)00025-8
47. Lesh, N. (1998). Scalable and adaptive goal recognition. Seattle, WA: University of Washington.
48. Malle, B. F., Moses, L. J., & Baldwin, D. A. (2003). Intentions and intentionality: Foundations of social cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
49. Mao, W., & Gratch, J. (2004). A utility-based approach to intention recognition. Paper presented at the AAMAS 2004 Workshop on Agent Tracking: Modeling Other Agents from Observations. New York, NY.
50. Meltzoff, A. N. (2005). Imitation and other minds: the "like me" hypothesi. In Hurley, S. A. C. (Ed.), Perspectives on Imitation: From Neuroscience to Social Science: Imitation, Human Development, and Culture (pp. 55-77). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
51. Meltzoff, A. N. (2007). The framework for recognizing and becoming an intentional agent. Acta Psychologica, 124(1), 26-43. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.09.005
52. Mikhail, J. (2007). Universal moral grammar: Theory, evidence, and the future. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(4), 143-152. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.12.007
53. Newman, J. O. (2006). Quantifying the standard of proof beyond a reasonable doubt: A comment on three comments. Law Probability and Risk, 5(3-4), 267-269. doi:10.1093/lpr/mgm010
54. Niemela, I., & Simons, P. (1997). Probabilistic reasoning with answer sets. Paper presented at the LPNMR4. New York, NY.
55. Osborne, M. J. (2004). An introduction to game theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
56. Pearl, J. (1988). Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: Networks of plausible inference. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
57. Pearl, J. (2000). Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
58. Pereira, L. M., Dell'Acqua, P., & Lopes, G. (2012). Inspecting and preferring abductive models. In Handbook on Reasoning-Based Intelligent Systems. Singapore, Singapore: World Scientific Publishers.
59. Pereira, L. M., & Han, T. A. (2009a). Evolution prospection. In Proceedings of International Symposium on Intelligent Decision Technologies (KES-IDT 2009). KES-IDT.
60. Pereira, L. M., & Han, T. A. (2009b). Evolution prospection in decision making. Intelligent Decision Technologies, 3(3), 157-171.
61. Pereira, L. M., & Han, T. A. (2009c). Intention recognition via causal bayes networks plus plan generation. Paper presented at the Progress in Artificial Intelligence, Proceedings of 14th Portuguese International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (EPIA 2009). Evora, Portgual.
62. Pereira, L. M., & Han, T. A. (2011a). Elder care via intention recognition and evolution prospection. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Applications of Declarative Programming and Knowledge Management (INAP). Evora, Portugal: Springer.
63. Pereira, L. M., & Han, T. A. (2011b). Intention recognition with evolution prospection and causal bayes networks. In In Computational Intelligence for Engineering Systems 3: Emergent Applications (pp. 1-33). Berlin, Germany: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-0093-2_1
64. Pereira, L. M., & Lopes, G. (2009). Prospective logic agents. International Journal of ReasoningBased Intelligent Systems, 1(3/4).
65. Pinker, S., Nowak, M. A., & Lee, J. J. (2008). The logic of indirect speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(3), 833-838. doi:10.1073/pnas.0707192105
66. Pynadath, D. V., & Wellman, M. P. (1995). Accounting for context in plan recognition, with application to traffic monitoring. In Proceedings of Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI 1995). UAI.
67. Radke, S., Guroglu, B., & de Bruijn, E. R. A. (2012). There's something about a fair split: Intentionality moderates context-based fairness considerations in social decision-making. PLoS ONE, 7(2). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0031491
68. Rao, A. S., & Georgeff, M. P. (1991). Modeling rational agents within a BDI-architecture. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference of Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. IEEE.
69. Rao, A. S., & Georgeff, M. P. (1995). BDI agents: From theory to practice. In Proceeding of First International Conference on Multiagent Systems. IEEE.
70. Robson, A. (1990). Efficiency in evolutionary games: Darwin, Nash, and the secret handshake. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 144(3), 379-396. doi:10.1016/S0022-5193(05)80082-7
71. Roy, O. (2009a). Intentions and interactive transformations of decision problems. Synthese, 169(2), 335-349. doi:10.1007/s11229-009-9553-5
72. Roy, O. (2009b). Thinking before acting: Intentions, logic, rational choice. Retrieved from http://olivier.amonbofis.net/docs/Thesis_Olivier_Roy.pdf
73. Roy, P., Bouchard, B., Bouzouane, A., & Giroux, S. (2007). A hybrid plan recognition model for Alzheimer's patients: Interleaved-erroneous dilemma. In Proceedings of IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology. IEEE.
74. Russell, S. J., & Norvig, P. (2003). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
75. Sadri, F. (2008). Multi-agent ambient intelligence for elderly care and assistance. In Proceedings of International Electronic Conference on Computer Science. IEEE.
76. Sadri, F. (2010). Logic-based approaches to intention recognition. In Handbook of Research on Ambient Intelligence: Trends and Perspectives (pp. 375). Springer.
77. Sadri, F. (2011a). Ambient intelligence: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 43(4), 1-66. doi:10.1145/1978802.1978815
78. Sadri, F. (2011b). Intention recognition with event calculus graphs and weight of evidence. In Proceedings 4th International Workshop on Human Aspects in Ambient Intelligence. IEEE.
79. Searle, J. R. (1995). The construction of social reality. New York, NY: The Free Press.
80. Searle, J. R. (2010). Making the social world: The structure of human civilization. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
81. Sigmund, K. (2010). The calculus of selfishness. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
82. Singh, M. P. (1991). Intentions, commitments and rationality. Paper presented at the 13th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. New York, NY.
83. Sukthankar, G. R. (2007). Activity recognition for agent teams. Retrieved from http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~gitars/gsukthankar-thesis.pdf
84. Sukthankar, G. R., & Sycara, K. (2008). Robust and efficient plan recognition for dynamic multi-agent teams. In Proceedings of International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. IEEE.
85. Swift, T. (1999). Tabling for non-monotonic programming. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 25(3-4), 240.
86. Tahboub, K. A. (2006). Intelligent human-machine interaction based on dynamic Bayesian networks probabilistic intention recognition. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 45, 31-52. doi:10.1007/s10846-005-9018-0
87. Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
88. Tomasello, M. (2008). Origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
89. Trivers, R. (2011). The folly of fools: The logic of deceit and self-deception in human life. New York, NY: Basic Books.
90. Tu, P. H., Son, T. C., & Baral, C. (2007). Reasoning and planning with sensing actions, incomplete information, and static causal laws using answer set programming. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 7(4), 377-450. doi:10.1017/S1471068406002948
91. Tu, P. H., Son, T. C., Gelfond, M., & Morales, A. R. (2011). Approximation of action theories and its application to conformant planning. Artificial Intelligence, 175(1), 79-119. doi:10.1016/j.artint.2010.04.007
92. van Hees, M., & Roy, O. (2008). Intentions and plans in decision and game theory. In Reasons and Intentions (pp. 207-226). New York, NY: Ashgate Publishers.
93. Woodward, A. L., Sommerville, J. A., Gerson, S., Henderson, A. M. E., & Buresh, J. (2009). The emergence of intention attribution in infancy. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 51, 187-222. doi:10.1016/S0079-7421(09)51006-7
94. Wooldridge, M. (2000). Reasoning about rational agents. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
95. Wooldridge, M. (2002). Reasoning about rational agents. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 5(1).
96. XSB. (2009). The XSB system version 3.2 vol. 2: Libraries, interfaces and packages. XSB.
97. Young, L., & Saxe, R. (2011). When ignorance is no excuse: Different roles for intent across moral domains. Cognition, 120(2), 202-214. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.04.005