External benefits of waste-to-energy in Korea: A choice experiment study

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Volumn 34, Issue , 2014, Pages 588-595

  Lim, Seul Ye ^a   Lim, Kyoung Min ^a   Yoo, Seung Hoon ^a  

^a Seoul National University of Science and Technology   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Choice experiment; Multinomial logit model; Nested logit model; Waste to energy; Willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

CRUDE OIL; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ENERGY SECURITY; LAND FILL; SURVEYS;

CHOICE EXPERIMENTS; MULTINOMIAL LOGIT MODEL; NESTED LOGIT MODEL; WASTE TO ENERGY; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

GREENHOUSE GASES;

EID: 84898068496     PISSN: 13640321     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.03.045     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. BP, BP statistical review of world energy. Available at: www.bp.com; 2013.
2. A.M. Borchers, J.M. Duke, and G.R. Parsons Does willingness to pay for green electricity differ by source? Energy Policy 35 2007 3327 3334
3. M. Soliño External benefits of biomass-e in Spain: an economic valuation Bioresour Technol 101 2010 1992 1997
4. A. Susaeta, P. Lal, J. Alavalapati, and E. Mercer Random preferences towards bioenergy environmental externalities: a case study of woody biomass based electricity in the Southern United States Energy Econ 33 2011 1111 1118
5. M. Soliño, B.A. Farizo, M.X. Vazquez, and A. Prada Generating electricity with forest biomass: Consistency and payment timeframe effects in choice experiments Energy Policy 41 2012 798 806
6. Statistics Korea. New & renewable energy statistics. Available at: http://www.kostat.go.kr; 2011.
7. D. Hite, P. Duffy, D. Bransby, and C. Slaton Consumer willingness-to-pay for biopower: results from focus groups Biomass Bioenergy 32 2008 11 17
8. B.D. Solomon, and N.H. Johnson Valuing climate protection through willingness to pay for biomass ethanol Ecol Econ 68 2009 2137 2144
9. M. Soliño, A. Prada, and M.X. Vázquez Designing a forest-energetic policy to reduce forest fires in Galicia (Spain): a contingent valuation application J For Econ 16 2010 217 233
10. N. Hanley, R.E. Wright, and W. Adamowicz Using choice experiments to value the environment Environ Resour Econ 11 1998 413 428
11. M. Morrison, J.W. Bennett, R.K. Blamey, and J. Louviere Choice modeling and tests of benefit transfer Am J Agric Econ 84 2002 161 170
12. F. Carlsson, P. Frykblom, and C. Liljenstolpe Valuing wetland attributes: an application of choice experiments Ecol Econ 47 2003 95 103
13. S.-J. Ku, S.-H. Yoo, and S.-J. Kwak Willingness to pay for improving residential waste disposal system in Korea: a choice experiment study Environ Manag 44 2009 278 287
14. S.-J. Ku, and S.-H. Yoo Willingness to pay for renewable energy investment in Korea: a choice experiment study Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14 2010 2196 2201
15. R.H. Phelps, and J. Shanteau Livestock judges: how much information can an expert use? Organ Behav Hum Perform 21 1978 209 219
16. P.E. Green On the design of choice experiments involving multifactor alternatives J Consum Res 1 1974 61 68
17. S.-H. Yoo, S.-J. Kwak, and J.-S. Lee Using a choice experiment to measure the environmental costs of air pollution impacts in Seoul J Environ Manag 86 2008 308 318
18. W.F. Kuhfeld, R.D. Tobias, and M. Garratt Efficient experimental design with marketing research applications J Mark Res 31 1994 545 557
19. D. McFadden Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior P. Zarembka, Front Econom 1973 Academic Press New York 105 140
20. D. McFadden Modeling the choice of residential location A. Karlquist, L. Lundquist, F. Snikars, J.W. Weibull, Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models 1978 North-Holland Amsterdam 75 96
21. C.L. Kling, and C.J. Thomson The implications of model specification for welfare estimates in nested logit models Am J Agric Econ 78 1996 103 114
22. J. Gordon, R. Chapman, and R. Blamey Assessing the options for canberra water supply: an application of choice modeling J. Bennett, R. Blamey, The Choice Modelling Approach to Environmental Valuation 2001 Edward Elgar 73 92
23. T. Park, J.B. Loomis, and M. Creel Confidence intervals for evaluating benefits from dichotomous choice contingent valuation studies Land Econ 67 1991 64 73
24. I. Krinsky, and A. Robb On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities Rev Econ Stat 68 1986 715 719