Willingness to pay for renewable energy investment in Korea: A choice experiment study

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Volumn 14, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 2196-2201

  Ku, Se Ju ^a   Yoo, Seung Hoon ^b  

^a Korea University   (South Korea)

^b Hoseo University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Choice experiment; Multinomial probit model; Renewable energy sources; Willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

ECONOMICS; GLOBAL WARMING; NATURAL RESOURCES; RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES;

CHOICE EXPERIMENTS; EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES; ERROR CORRELATION STRUCTURE; MULTINOMIAL PROBIT MODELS; RENEWABLE ENERGY INVESTMENTS; RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCE; WILLINGNESS TO PAY; WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR RENEWABLE ENERGIES;

INVESTMENTS;

EID: 77954643879     PISSN: 13640321     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2010.03.013     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC special report on carbon dioxide storage. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
2. A. Menegaki Valuation for renewable energy: a comparative review Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 12 2008 2422 2437
3. A. Longo, A. Markandya, and M. Petrucci The internalization of externalities in the production of electricity; willingness to pay for the attributes of a policy for renewable energy Ecological Economics 67 2008 140 152
4. K. Train Qualitative choice analysis: theory, econometrics and an application to automobile demand 1986 The MIT Press Cambridge, MA
5. C.R. Bhat A heteroscedastic extreme value model of intercity travel mode choice Transportation Research 29B 1995 471 483
6. D.F. Layton Random coefficient models for stated preference surveys Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 40 2000 21 36
7. BP. Statistical review of world energy 2008. Available at: http://www.bp.com.
8. S.H. Yoo, S.J. Kwak, and J.S. Lee Using a choice experiment to measure the environmental costs of air pollution impacts in Seoul Journal of Environmental Management 86 2008 308 318
9. N. Hanley, R.E. Wright, and W. Adamowicz Using choice experiments to value the environment Environmental and Resource Economics 11 1998 413 428
10. SPSS SPSS conjoint 14.0 2005 SPSS Inc. Chicago
11. G.S. Maddala Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics 1983 Cambridge University Press New York
12. W. Adamowicz, J. Louviere, and M. Williams Combining revealed and stated preference methods for valuing environmental amenities Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26 1994 271 292
13. J. Geweke Bayesian inference in econometric models using Monte Carlo integration Econometrica 57 1989 1317 1339
14. M. Keane A computationally practical simulation estimator for panel data Econometrica 62 1994 95 116
15. V. Hajivassiliou, and D. McFadden The method of simulated scores for the estimation LDV models Econometrica 66 1998 863 896
16. Korea Energy Economics Institute. Available at: http://www.keei.re.kr.
17. T. Park, J.B. Loomis, and M. Creel Confidence intervals for evaluating benefits from dichotomous choice contingent valuation studies Land Economics 67 1991 64 73
18. I. Krinsky, and A. Robb On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities Review of Economics and Statistics 68 1986 715 719
19. V. Hajivassiliou, D. McFadden, and P. Ruud Simulation of multivariate normal rectangle probabilities and their derivatives, theoretical and computational results Journal of Econometrics 72 1996 85 134
20. Lawrence E. Simulated maximum likelihood via the GHK simulator: an application to the 1988 Democratic Super Tuesday Primary. Paper presented at the 1996 Midwest Political Science Association; 1996.