Interlocus sexually antagonistic coevolution can create indirect selection for increased recombination

Evolution

Volumn 68, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 1216-1224

  Dapper, Amy L ^a   Lively, Curtis M ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Epistasis; Heterogeneous selection; Linkage disequilibrium; Recombination modifier; Sexual conflict

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; ANTAGONISM; COEVOLUTION; EPISTASIS; HETEROGENEITY; HOST-PARASITE INTERACTION; NATURAL SELECTION; RECOMBINATION; SEXUAL CONFLICT;

ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; EPISTASIS; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; MALE; POPULATION GENETICS; REPRODUCTION; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; EPISTASIS, GENETIC; FEMALE; GENETIC FITNESS; GENETICS, POPULATION; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; REPRODUCTION; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84898056713     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/evo.12338     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Agrawal, A. F. 2009. Differences between selection on sex versus recombination in red queen models with diploid hosts. Evolution 63:2131-2141.
2. Arnqvist, G. 1989. Sexual selection in a water strider: mutual benefits or intersexual conflict? Anim. Behav. 43:559-567.
3. Arnqvist, G. 1992. Precopulatory fighting in a water strider: the function, mechanism of selection and heritability of a male grasping apparatus. Oikos 56:344-350.
4. Arnqvist, G., and L. Rowe 2005. Sexual Conflict. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
5. Barton, N. H. 1995. A general model for the evolution of recombination. Genet. Res. 65:123-144.
6. Becks, L., and A. F. Agrawal 2010. Higher rates of sex evolve in spatially heterogeneous environments. Nature 468:89-92.
7. Chapman, T. 2001. Seminal fluid-mediated fitness traits in Drosophila. Heredity 87:511-521.
8. Charlesworth, B. 1976. Recombination modification in a fluctuating environment. Genetics 83:181-195.
9. Crow, J. F., and M. Kimura 1970. An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. The Blackburn Press, Caldwell, NJ.
10. de Visser, J. A. G. M., T. F. Cooper, and S. F. Elena 2011. The causes of epistasis. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 278:3617-3622.
11. Feldman, M. W., F. B. Christiansen, and L. D. Brooks 1980. Evolution of recombination in a constant environment. PNAS 77:4838-4841.
12. Felsenstein, J. 1974. The evolutionary advantage of recombination. Genetics 78:737-756.
13. Findlay, G. D., X. Yi, M. J. MacCoss, and W. J. Swanson 2008. Proteomics reveals novel Drosophila seminal fluid proteins transferred at mating. PLoS Biol. 6:1417-1426.
14. Frank, S. A. 1996. Recognition and polymorphism in host-parasite genetics. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 346:283-293.
15. Gandon, S., and S. P. Otto 2007. The evolution of sex and recombination in response to abiotic or coevolutionary fluctuations in epistasis. Genetics 175:1835-1853.
16. Hamilton, W. D. 1980. Sex versus non-sex versus parasite. Oikos 35:282-290.
17. Hill, W. G., and A. Robertson 1966. The effect of linkage on the limits to artificial selection. Genet. Res. 8:269-294.
18. Karlin, S. 1979. Principles of polymorphism and epistasis for multilocus systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 76:541-545.
19. Lenormand, T. 2003. The evolution of sex dimorphism in recombination. Genetics 163:811-822.
20. Lenormand, T., and S. P. Otto 2000. The evolution of recombination in a heterogeneous environment. Genetics 156:423-438.
21. Maynard-Smith, J. 1977. Why the genome does not congeal. Nature 268:693-696.
22. Maynard-Smith, J. 1978. The Evolution of Sex. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
23. McGraw, L. A., G. Gibson, A. G. Clark, and M. F. Wolfner 2004. Genes regulated by mating, sperm, or seminal proteins in mated female Drosophila melanogaster. Curr. Biol. 14:1509-1514.
24. Mueller, H. J. 1964. The relation of recombination to mutational advance. Mutat. Res. 106:2-9.
25. Nee, S. 1989. Antagonistic co-evolution and the evolution of genotypic randomization. J. Theor. Biol. 140:499-518.
26. Nei, M. 1967. Modification of linkage intensity by natural selection. Genetics 57:625-641.
27. Otto, S. P. and M. W. Feldman 1997. Deleterious mutations, variable epistatic interactions, and the evolution of recombination. Theor. Popul. Biol. 51:134-147.
28. Otto, S. P., and S. Nuismer 2004. Species interactions and the evolution of sex. Science 304:1018-1020.
29. Patten, M. M., F. Ubeda, and D. Haig 2013. Sexual and parental antagonism shape genomic architecture. Proc. Roy. Soc. B 280:20131795.
30. Peters, A. D., and C. M. Lively 1999. The red queen and fluctuating epistasis: a population genetic analysis of antagonistic coevolution. Am. Nat. 154:393-405.
31. Peters, A. D., and C. M. Lively 2007. Short- and long-term benefits and detriments to recombination under antagonistic coevolution. J. Evol. Biol. 20:1206-1217.
32. Pylkov, K. V., L. A. Zhivotovsky, and M. W. Feldman 1998. Migration versus mutation in the evolution of recombination under multilocus selection. Genet. Res. 71:247-256.
33. Roze, D., and S. P. Otto 2012. Differential selection between the sexes and selection for sex. Evolution 66:558-574.
34. Salathé, M., R. D. Kouyos, and S. Bonhoeffer 2008. The state of affairs in the kingdom of the Red Queen. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23:439-445.
35. Salathé, M., R. D. Kouyos, and S. Bonhoeffer 2009. On the causes of selection for recombination underlying the red queen hypothesis. Am. Nat. 174:S31-S42.
36. Sturtevant, A. H., and K. Mather 1938. The interrelations of inversions, heterosis and recombination. Am. Nat. 72:447-452.
37. Swanson, W. J., and V. D. Vacquier 2002. The rapid evolution of reproductive proteins. Nature Reviews Genetics 3:137-144.
38. Úbeda, F., D. Haig, and M. M. Patten 2011. Stable linkage disequilibrium owing to sexual antagonism. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 278:855-862.
39. Westlake, K. P., L. Rowe, and D. C. Currie 2000. Phylogeny of the water strider genus Rheumatobates (Heteroptera: Gerridae). Syst. Entomol. 25:125-145.
40. Wigby, S., and T. Chapman 2005. Sex peptide causes mating costs in female Drosophila melanogaster. Curr. Biol. 15:316-321.
41. Wolfner, M. F. 1997. Tokens of love: functions and regulation of Drosophila male accessory gland products. Insect Biochem. Mol. Ecol. 27:179-192.
42. Wyman, M. J., and M. C. Wyman 2013. Sex-specific recombination rates and allele frequencies affect the invasion of sexually antagonistic variation on the autosomes. J. Evol. Biol. 26:2428-2437.
43. Zhivotovsky, L. A., M. W. Feldman, and F. B. Christiansen 1994. Evolution of recombination among multiple selected loci - a generalized reduction principle. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 91:1079-1083.