Designing situated learning experiences

Innovative Mobile Learning: Techniques and Technologies

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 255-272

  Ryu, Hokyoung ^a  

^a MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898043136     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-062-2.ch013     Document Type: Chapter

References (35)

1. Atkins, C. (2005). Adult education and social reform. Lecture notes in the distant lifelong education of the University of Nottingham. Hong Kong.
2. Becerra-Fernandez, I., Cousins, K. C., & Weber, R. O. (2007). Nomadic context-aware knowledge management systems: Applications, challenges and research problems. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organization, 1(2), 103-121.
3. Bendy, G. Z., Seglin, M. H., & Meister, D. (2000). Activity theory: history, research and application. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomic Sciences, 1(2), 168-206.
4. Bertelsen, O. W., & Bødker, S. (2003). Activity theory. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.), HCI models, theories, and frameworks: Toward a multidisciplinary science (pp. 291-324). San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
5. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and culture of learning. Educational Technology, 18(1), 32-42.
6. Brusilovsky, P., Schwarz, E., & Weber, G. (1996). A tool for developing adaptive electronic textbooks on www., The Webnet 96 Conference of the Web Society. San Francisco, CA.
7. Corlett, D., Sharples, M., Bull, S., & Chan, T. (2005). Evaluation of a mobile learning organizer for university students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 162-170.
8. Davis, F. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
9. Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
10. Demirjian, A., & David, B. (1995). Learning medical and dental sciences through interactive multi-media. Medinfo, 8, 1705.
11. Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowd, G., & Beale, R. (2005). Human-computer interaction (3rd ed.). London: Prentice Hall.
12. Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engestrom & R. Miettinen & R.-L. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19-38). New York: Cambridge University Press.
13. Eschenbrenner, B., & Nah, F. F. (2007). Mobile technology in education: Uses and benefits. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organization, 1(2), 159-183.
14. Flannigan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51(4), 327-358.
15. Flannigan, J. C. (1962). Measuring human performance. Pittsburgh, PA: American Institutes for Research.
16. Gilbert, A. (2005). New for back-to-school: 'Click-ers.' CNet news.com.
17. Horwood, A. (2003, 01.03.2003). Txt 2 help u quit smoking. New Zealand Herald.
18. Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2007). Hooked into learning: Designing for the Unexpected. In W. o. P. L. 2007 (Ed.). Toronto, Canada.
19. Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Traxler, J. (Eds.). (2005). Mobile learning: A handbook for educators and trainers. London: Routledge.
20. Kurti, A., Spikol, D., & Milrad, M. (2007). Bridging outdoors and indoors educational activities in schools with the support of mobile and positioning technologies. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organization.
21. Kurti, A., Spikol, D., Milrad, M., & Svensson, M. (2007). Exploring how pervasive computing can support situated learning, Pervasive Learning. Toronto, Canada: Centre for Mobile Computing, Massey University.
22. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
23. Leont'ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
24. Lyytinen, K., & Yoo, Y. (2003). Issues and challenges in ubiquitous computing. Communications of ACM, 45(12), 62-65.
25. Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behaviour. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 173-191.
26. Rogers, Y., Price, S., Randell, C., Fraser, D. S., Weal, M., & Fizpatrick, G. (2005). Ubi-learning integrates indoor and outdoor experiences. Communications of the ACM, 48(1), 55-59.
27. Ryu, H., & Parsons, D. (2007). A learner-centred design of a location-aware learning reminder. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organization.
28. Scornavacca, E., Huff, S. L., & Marshall, S. (2007). Developing a SMS-based classroom interaction, mobile learning technologies and applications. Auckland, New Zealand.
29. Sharples, M., Corlett, D., Bull, S., Chan, T., & Rudman, P. (2005). The student learning organizer. In A. Kukulska-Hulme & J. Traxler (Eds.), Mobile learning: A handbook for educators and trainers. London: Routledge.
30. Sharples, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, G. (2005). Theory of learning for the Mobile age, MLEARN. Cape Town, South Africa.
31. Smailagic, A., & Kogan, D. (2002). Location sensing and privacy in a context-aware computing environment. IEEE Wireless Communications, 9(5), 10-17.
32. Sommerville, I. (1996). Software engineering. London: Addison-Wesley.
33. Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human machine communication. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
34. Tarasewich, P. (2003). Designing mobile commerce applications. Communications of the ACM, 46, 57-60.
35. Uden, L. (2007). Activity theory for designing mobile learning. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organization, 1(1), 81-102.