The role of perceived source location in auditory stream segregation: Separation affects sound organization, common fate does not

Learning and Perception

Volumn 5, Issue , 2013, Pages 55-72

  Bohm, Tamás M ^a,b   Shestopalova, Lidia ^c   Bendixen, Alexandra ^d,e   Andreou, Andreas G ^f,g   Georgiou, Julius ^g   Garreau, Guillame ^g   Pouliquen, Philippe ^f,g   Cassidy, Andrew ^f   Denham, Susan L ^h   Winkler, István ^a,i  

^a INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

^b BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS   (Hungary)

^c PAVLOV INSTITUTE OF PHYSIOLOGY   (Russian Federation)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY OF OLDENBURG   (Germany)

^f Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CYPRUS   (Cyprus)

^h UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF SZEGED   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Auditory motion; Auditory perception; Auditory scene analysis; Auditory stream segregation; Auditory streaming paradigm; Bistable perception; Localization; Natural movement

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898035732     PISSN: 17893186     EISSN: 20609175     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1556/LP.5.2013.Suppl2.5     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Altman, J. A., Vaitulevich, S. P., Shestopalova, L. B., Petropavlovskaia, E. A. (2010): How does mismatch negativity reflect auditory motion? Hearing Research, 268, 194-201.
2. Altman, J. A., Vaitulevich, S. P., Shestopalova, L. B., Varfolomeev, A. L. (2005). Mismatch negativity evoked by stationary and moving auditory images of different azimuthal positions. Neuroscience Letters, 384, 330-335.
3. Blauert, J. (1997). Spatial Hearing. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
4. Bregman, A. S. (1990). Auditory Scene Analysis. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
5. Denham, S. L., Gyimesi, K., Stefanics, G., Winker, I. (2013). Perceptual bi-stability in auditory streaming: How much do stimulus features matter? Learning and Perception, 5(Suppl. 2), 73-100. (this issue)
6. Denham, S. L., Gyimesi, K., Stefanics, G., Winkler, I. (2009). Stability of perceptual organisation in auditory streaming. In: Lopez-Poveda, E. A., Palmer, A. R., Meddis, R. (eds.), The Neurophysiological Bases of Auditory Perception (pp. 477-488). Springer.
7. Denham, S. L., Winkler, I. (2006). The role of predictive models in the formation of auditory streams. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 100, 154-170.
8. Georgiou, J., Pouliquen, P., Cassidy, A., Garreau, G., Andreou, C., Stuarts, G. et al. (2011). A multimodal-corpus data collection system for cognitive acoustic scene analysis. In 45th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems (CISS 2011) (pp. 1-6).
9. Grantham, D. W. (1995). Spatial hearing and related phenomena. In B. C. J. Moore (Ed.), Hearing (pp. 297-346). San Diego: Academic Press.
10. Grimault, N., Bacon, S. P., Micheyl, C. (2002). Auditory stream segregation on the basis of amplitude-modulation rate. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111, 1340-1348.
11. Judd, T. (1977). An explanation of Deutsch's scale illusion. Unpublished manuscript. Department of Psychology, Cornell University.
12. Köhler, W. (1947). Gestalt Psychology. (2 ed.) New York: Liveright.
13. Middlebrooks, J. C., Green, D. M. (1991). Sound Localization by Human Listeners. Annual Review of Psychology, 42, 135-159.
14. Moore, B. C. J., Gockel, H. (2002). Factors influencing sequential stream segregation. Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 88, 320-333.
15. Moreno-Bote, R., Shpiro, A., Rinzel, J., Rubin, N. (2010). Alternation rate in perceptual bistability is maximal at and symmetric around equi-dominance. Journal of Vision, 10.
16. Perrott, D. R., Marlborough, K. (1989). Minimum Audible Movement Angle - Marking the End-Points of the Path Traveled by A Moving Sound Source. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 1773-1775.
17. Pressnitzer, D., Hupé, J. M. (2006). Temporal dynamics of auditory and visual bistability reveal common principles of perceptual organization. Current Biology, 16, 1351-1357.
18. Roberts, B., Glasberg, B. R., Moore, B. C. (2002). Primitive stream segregation of tone sequences without differences in fundamental frequency or passband. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112, 2074-2085.
19. Smith, J., Hausfeld, S., Power, R. P., Gorta, A. (1982). Ambiguous musical figures and auditory streaming. Percept. Psychophys., 32, 454-464.
20. Szalárdy, O., Bendixen, A., Tóth, D., Denham, S. L., Winkler, I. (2013). Modulation frequency acts as a primary cue for auditory stream segregation. Learning and Perception, 5 (Suppl. 2) 149-161 (this issue)
21. van Noorden, L. P. A. S. (1975). Temporal coherence in the perception of tone sequences. Ph. D. Eindhoven University of Technology, Leiden, The Netherlands.
22. Vliegen, J., Oxenham, A. J. (1999). Sequential stream segregation in the absence of spectral cues. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105, 339-346.
23. Winkler, I. (2007). Interpreting the mismatch negativity. Journal of Psychophysiology, 21, 147-163.
24. Winkler, I., Denham, S. L., Nelken, I. (2009). Modeling the auditory scene: predictive regularity representations and perceptual objects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 532-540.