SCORS-G stimulus characteristics of select thematic apperception test cards

Journal of Personality Assessment

Volumn 96, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 339-349

  Stein, Michelle B ^a   Slavin Mulford, Jenelle ^b   Siefert, Caleb J ^c   Sinclair, Samuel Justin ^a   Renna, Megan ^a   Malone, Johanna ^a   Bello, Iruma ^d   Blais, Mark A ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b Department of Psychology Augusta State University   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN DEARBORN   (United States)

^d NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; DEVICES; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MENTAL DISORDERS; MIDDLE AGED; OUTPATIENT; PERSONALITY TEST; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOMETRY; STANDARDS;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL DISORDERS; MIDDLE AGED; OUTPATIENTS; PSYCHOMETRICS; THEMATIC APPERCEPTION TEST;

EID: 84897996572     PISSN: 00223891     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2013.823440     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Alvarado, N. (1994). Empirical validity of the Thematic Apperception Test. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 59-79.
2. Aronow, E., Weiss, K. A., & Reznikoff, M. (2001). A practical guide to the Thematic Apperception Test: The TAT in clinical practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
3. Bellak, L., & Abrams, D. M. (1997). The T.A.T., C.A.T., and S.A.T. in clinical use (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
4. Campus, N. (1976). A measure of needs to assess the stimulus characteristics of TAT cards. Journal of Personality Assessment, 40, 248-258.
5. Cramer, P. (1991). The development of defense mechanisms: Theory, research and assessment. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
6. Crick, G. E., & Brennan, R. L. (1982). GENOVA: A generalized analysis of variance system. Dorchester, MA: University of Massachusetts at Boston, Computer Facilities.
7. Ehrenreich, J. H. (1990). Quantitative studies of responses elicited by selected TAT cards. Psychological Reports, 67, 15-18.
8. Eron, L. D. (1948). Frequencies and themes and identifications in the stories of schizophrenic patients and non-hospitalized college students. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 12, 387-395.
9. Eron, L. D. (1950). A normative study of the Thematic Apperception Test. Psychological Monographs, 64(9), 1-47.
10. Eron, L. D. (1953). Responses of woman to the Thematic Apperception Test. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 17, 269-282.
11. Eudell-Simmons, E.M., Stein,M. B., DeFife, J. A., & Hilsenroth,M. J. (2005). Reliability and validity of the Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale (SCORS) in the assessment of dream narratives. Journal of Personality Assessment, 85, 325-333.
12. Exner, J. E. (1995). The Rorschach: A Comprehensive System. Vol. 1: Basic foundations. New York, NY: Wiley.
13. Goldfried, M. R., & Zax, M. (1965). The stimulus value of the TAT. Journal of Projective Techniques and Personality Assessment, 29(1), 46-57.
14. Hilsenroth, M., Stein, M., & Pinsker, J. (2007). Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale: Global Rating Method (SCORS-G, 2nd ed.). Unpublished manuscript, TheDerner Institute of Advanced Psychological Studies,Adelphi University, Garden City, NY.
15. Holt, R. (1978). Methods in clinical psychology (Vol. 1). NewYork, NY: Plenum.
16. Jenkins, S. R. (2008). A handbook of clinical scoring systems for the thematic apperceptive techniques. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
17. Luborsky, L., & Crits-Christoph, P. (1998). Understanding transference: The Core Conflictual Relationship Theme method (2nd ed). Washington, DC: American Psychological Organization.
18. Murray, H. A. (1943). Manual for the Thematic Apperception Test. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19. Murstein, B. I. (1965). The stimulus. In B. Murstein (Ed.), Handbook of projective techniques. New York, NY: Basic Books.
20. Murstein, B. I. (1972). The thematic test and the Rorschach in predictingmarital choice. Journal of Personality Assessment, 36, 213-217.
21. Peterson, C. A., & Schilling, K. M. (1983). Card pull in projective testing. Journal of Personality Assessment, 47, 265-275.
22. Pine, F. (1960). A manual for rating drive content in the Thematic Apperception Test. Journal of Projective Techniques, 24, 32-45.
23. Pinsker, J. H., Stein, M. B., & Hilsenroth, M. J. (2007). The clinical utility of early memories as predictors of therapeutic alliance. Psychotherapy, 44, 96-109.
24. Rapaport, D., Gill, M. M., & Schafer, R. (1968). Diagnostic psychological testing (Rev. ed.). New York, NY: International Universities Press.
25. Rosenzweig, S., & Fleming, E. (1949). Apperceptive norms for the Thematic Apperception Test: An empirical investigation. Journal of Personality, 49, 483-503.
26. Seedwaldt, V. (2006). Using the CCRT to interpret the TAT: Understanding the phenomenon of "card pull" (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Adelphi University, Garden City, NY.
27. Shavelson, R. J., & Webb, N. M. (1991). Generalizability theory: A primer. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28. Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420-428.
29. Slavin, J. M., Stein, M. B., Pinsker-Aspen, J. H., & Hilsenroth, M. J. (2007). Early memories from outpatients with and without a history of childhood sexual abuse. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 12, 1-16.
30. Stein, M. B., Hilsenroth, M. J., Pinsker-Aspen, J. H., & Primavera, L. (2009). Validity of the DSM-IVAxisVGlobalAssessment of Relational Functioning Scale: A multimethod assessment. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 197, 50-55.
31. Stein, M. B., Hilsenroth, M., Slavin-Mulford, J., & Pinsker, J. (2011). Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale: Global RatingMethod (SCORS-G; 4th ed.). Unpublished manuscript, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
32. Stein, M. B., Pinsker-Aspen, J. H., & Hilsenroth, M. J. (2007). Borderline pathology and the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI): An evaluation of criterion and concurrent validity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88, 81-89.
33. Stein, M. B., Slavin-Mulford, J., Sinclair, S. J., Siefert, C. J., & Blais, M. A. (2012). Exploring the construct validity of the Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale in a clinical sample. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 533-540.
34. Wechsler, D. (1999). Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI). San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.
35. Westen, D. (1995). Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale: Q-sort for projective stories (SCORS-Q). Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychiatry, The Cambridge Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA.
36. Westen, D., Klepser, J., Ruffins, S., Silverman, M., Lifton, N., & Boekamp, J. (1991). Object relations in childhood and adolescence: The development of working representations. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 400-409.
37. Zubin, J., Eron, L., & Schumer, F. (1965). An experimental approach to projective techniques. Chichester, UK: Wiley.